Explore how Proof of Work and Proof of Stake differ, their impact on security, energy use, and blockchain’s future. Learn which consensus mechanism suits your crypto needs.
Keep reading
There has been an influx of conversation about Proof of Work (PoW) and Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus mechanisms recently. But what do these really mean? In this article, we're fleshing out what they are, how they work, and how they differ from each other.
The shift from traditional PoW systems to more modern PoS alternatives represents one of the most significant developments in crypto history. Understanding these mechanisms isn't just academic curiosity - it directly impacts energy consumption, transaction speeds, security models, and the future sustainability of blockchain networks.
Whether you're considering which cryptocurrencies to invest in or simply want to understand the technology behind your digital assets, grasping these fundamental concepts is fairly important.
What is a consensus mechanism in crypto?
Before we get started, let's first address what a consensus mechanism is.
Whether PoW or PoS, the consensus mechanism is the agreed-upon protocol that the entire network will use to maintain and operate the blockchain. It looks at how transactions are verified, the amount of energy they require and how new coins enter circulation. The consensus mechanism is effectively the protocol that keeps all the computers on the network in check.
Think of a consensus mechanism as the rulebook that all participants in a blockchain network must follow. Without it, there would be no way to prevent double-spending (the digital equivalent of spending the same dollar twice). These mechanisms ensure that all participants agree on the current state of the ledger, maintaining the integrity and security that make cryptocurrencies valuable.
While PoW and PoS are the most prominent consensus mechanisms, others exist, including Proof of Authority (PoA) and Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS). Each serves specific use cases and comes with unique trade-offs between security, speed, and decentralisation.
What is Proof of Work (PoW)?
Proof of Work might be the most well-known of the two as Bitcoin, the first cryptocurrency to come into existence, uses it. Despite what many think, this was not when the consensus mechanism was created. It dates back before crypto's integration into the financial sector, right back to the early 1990s when it was initially used as a means to mitigate email spam.
The system worked in such a way that sending an email required a small amount of work to send one email, and a large amount to send out mass spam emails. Alongside blockchain technology, Satoshi Nakamoto reworked these concepts to create the first digital currency. While the electricity and money implications remained the same, he eradicated the need for human intervention.
The blockchain is made up of blocks containing data pertaining to the network, stored in chronological order. The first block on the blockchain is known as the Genesis block and is hardcoded into its software. Each block after that references the previous block and contains an updated version of the blockchain. Still with me? Let’s dive deeper.
New blocks are added to the network by miners who compete with each other to solve a complex cryptographic puzzle. The first to complete the puzzle gets to execute the transactions and receive the miner's fee (a reward for their time and energy).
The process of miners racing to finish the puzzle is known as hashing, as miners are guessing a string of pseudorandom numbers, known as hashes. Once a miner establishes the winning hash, it is broadcast to the network for all the nodes (network of computers) to verify whether it is correct or not. If it is correct, the block is added to the blockchain, and the miner receives the reward.
The reward is new coins that are then minted and added to circulation. In the case of Bitcoin, freshly minted BTC will be distributed to the miners, with this number reducing each time the blockchain reaches a certain number of blocks. This is called a halving and takes place every 210,000 blocks (which takes place roughly every 4 years). Halvings keep the cryptocurrency deflationary and finite.
Examples of Proof of Work cryptocurrencies
Major PoW cryptocurrencies include Bitcoin, Litecoin, Dogecoin, and Ethereum Classic. These networks have demonstrated remarkable security over the years of operation, with Bitcoin alone processing over $19 trillion in transaction volume in 2024 without a successful attack on its consensus mechanism.
However, this security comes at the cost of significant energy consumption, with Bitcoin's network alone consuming more electricity than some countries.
What is Proof of Stake (PoS)?
Proof of Stake was first introduced to the world through Peercoin in 2012, gaining more traction when Ethereum began implementing PoS in 2020 with the launch of Beacon Chain, and fully transitioned via The Merge in 2022.
Considered a more "energy-efficient" means of operating crypto networks, instead of using energy to race to find the winning hash, PoS focuses on participation in the network by looking at ownership in terms of the coin's total supply. PoS was designed to solve the energy problems that PoW platforms created.
Unlike PoW, which requires specialised mining equipment (ASICs), PoS validation can be done on standard hardware, provided there is stable internet and enough ETH staked.
Instead of a number of miners racing at the same time to solve the same puzzle, the PoS algorithm pseudo-randomly selects a node that will be responsible for verifying the transactions.
This election is based on the number of coins that a particular node holds. Once selected, the node verifies and signs off on the validity of the transactions and proposes the block to the network. Once the network accepts, the block is added to the blockchain in the same chronological order as the PoW consensus.
Nodes are selected by engaging in a process called staking. They are required to stake (lock) their funds on the platform as collateral in order to be selected. In order not to favour the richest of the nodes, the algorithm will typically also favour how long the funds have been staked for and add an element of randomisation.
As there is no competition between the miners to race to solve the puzzle, this process is referred to as minting or forging on the PoS networks. The cost implications are specific to that of the platform.
PoS networks often implement additional mechanisms to ensure fairness and security. Slashing is a penalty system where validators can lose a portion of their staked tokens if they act maliciously or fail to properly validate transactions. This economic incentive structure replaces the computational cost of PoW with financial risk, creating a different but equally effective deterrent against bad actors.
Examples of Proof of Stake cryptocurrencies
Leading PoS cryptocurrencies include Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, Polkadot, and Avalanche. These networks can process thousands of transactions per second while consuming a fraction of the energy required by PoW systems, making them attractive for applications requiring high throughput and environmental sustainability.
Proof of Work vs. Proof of Stake: key differences
Aspect | Proof of Work | Proof of Stake |
---|---|---|
Energy Use | Extremely high - requires massive computational power | Low - minimal electricity needed for validation |
Security Model | Computational cost makes attacks expensive | Economic penalties (slashing) deter malicious behaviour |
Scalability | Limited - Bitcoin processes ~7 TPS | High - can handle thousands of TPS |
Decentralisation | High but concentrated in mining pools | Potentially high but wealth concentration is a concern |
Barrier to Entry | High - requires expensive mining equipment | Lower - requires holding tokens to stake |
Environmental Impact | Significant carbon footprint | Minimal environmental impact |
Economic Incentives | Mining rewards decrease over time (halvings) | Consistent staking rewards based on participation |
The differences extend beyond these technical aspects. PoW networks tend to have more predictable issuance schedules and have proven their resilience over longer periods.
PoS networks also offer more flexibility in governance and can implement upgrades more easily, but they're still relatively new compared to established PoW systems.
Industry experts have varying perspectives on these trade-offs. Fidelity Digital Assets noted that PoW's "proven track record" gives it advantages in terms of demonstrated security, while others argue that PoS represents the natural evolution of blockchain technology toward greater efficiency and sustainability.
Pros and cons of PoW and PoS
Proof of Work: advantages and disadvantages
Advantages:
- PoW systems offer unparalleled security through their requirement for massive computational investment, making 51% attacks on networks like Bitcoin practically impossible to execute due to the enormous costs involved.
- These systems have demonstrated remarkable stability over more than a decade of operation, processing trillions of dollars in value with zero successful attacks on their core consensus mechanisms.
- The decentralised nature of mining operations, while concentrated in pools, still maintains a high degree of censorship resistance and network independence.
- PoW has a proven track record that provides confidence to institutional investors and long-term holders seeking maximum security for their assets.
Disadvantages:
- The energy consumption of PoW networks has become their most criticised aspect, with Bitcoin alone consuming more electricity than countries like Argentina.
- Transaction throughput remains severely limited, creating bottlenecks during periods of high demand and resulting in dramatically increased fees for users.
- The environmental impact has led to regulatory scrutiny in various jurisdictions, with some countries banning or restricting PoW mining operations.
- The high barrier to entry for mining has created concerns about centralisation in regions with cheap electricity, potentially concentrating power in specific geographic areas.
Proof of Stake: advantages and disadvantages
Advantages:
- PoS systems consume dramatically less energy while maintaining strong security through economic incentives rather than computational waste, reducing environmental impact by over 99%.
- They can process transactions much faster and at lower costs, making them suitable for everyday use and complex applications like DeFi.
- The lower barrier to entry allows more participants to earn rewards through staking, potentially leading to better decentralisation and broader network participation.
- These systems offer more flexibility for implementing upgrades and governance changes, allowing networks to evolve more rapidly in response to user needs.
Disadvantages:
- PoS networks are relatively new and haven't been tested over the same timeframes as PoW systems, creating uncertainty about their long-term security properties under extreme conditions.
- The "rich get richer" dynamic, where larger stakes earn proportionally more rewards, could lead to centralisation over time as wealth concentrates among the largest validators.
- Some critics argue that PoS systems are less censorship-resistant because validators can be more easily identified and potentially coerced by authorities or malicious actors.
- The complexity of slashing mechanisms and validator requirements introduces new types of risks for participants, including the potential for technical errors to result in financial losses.
It’s worth noting that Ethereum's successful transition to PoS through "The Merge" in September 2022 provided significant validation for the PoS model, demonstrating that large, valuable networks can successfully implement this consensus mechanism while maintaining security and functionality.
Why did Ethereum move to Proof of Stake?
Ethereum's transition from PoW to PoS, known as "The Merge," arguably represented one of the most significant technical achievements in crypto history. The upgrade, completed in September 2022, was driven by several critical factors that had been limiting Ethereum's growth and adoption.
The primary motivation was scalability. Ethereum's PoW system could only process about 15 transactions per second, creating severe bottlenecks as the network grew. High gas fees during peak usage periods made the network unsuitable for many applications, particularly those requiring frequent, small-value transactions.
The PoS system laid the groundwork for future upgrades that would dramatically increase transaction throughput.
Environmental concerns were a key factor in the shift, with the move to PoS cutting energy use by over 99%, directly tackling one of crypto’s biggest criticisms.
The economic shift was significant. Under its proof‑of‑work system, Ethereum paid out roughly $5 billion annually to miners via block rewards. After the Merge, those rewards shrank by over 80%, now going to validators who stake ETH—an approach widely seen as more sustainable. At the same time, the protocol burns a major portion of transaction fees under EIP‑1559, making ETH potentially deflationary during high usage.
The successful completion of The Merge sent a powerful signal to the broader crypto industry about the viability of PoS systems. It demonstrated that even large, complex networks with billions of dollars in value could successfully transition to more efficient consensus mechanisms without compromising security or functionality.
Which is more secure: PoW or PoS?
The security debate between PoW and PoS systems involves fundamentally different approaches to protecting blockchain networks. Both have proven effective, but they operate on distinct principles that create unique strengths and vulnerabilities.
Security
PoW security relies on the economic cost of mounting an attack. To successfully attack a PoW network, an adversary would need to control more than 50% of the network's hash rate, requiring massive investments in specialised hardware and electricity.
For Bitcoin, this would cost billions of dollars and require more mining equipment than currently exists. The beauty of this system lies in its simplicity - the security assumptions are straightforward and have been tested over many years.
PoS security operates through economic penalties rather than computational costs. Validators must stake significant amounts of the network's native token as collateral. If they act maliciously or fail to properly validate transactions, they face slashing: the permanent loss of their staked tokens. This economic incentive structure ensures that honest behaviour is more profitable than attempting to attack the network.
Centralisation
Each system faces different types of centralisation risks. PoW networks can become centralised through mining pools and the concentration of mining operations in regions with cheap electricity. PoS networks face the risk of wealth concentration, where large stakeholders could potentially gain disproportionate control over the network.
The "nothing at stake" problem, often cited as a weakness of PoS, has been largely addressed through sophisticated slashing mechanisms and finality rules. Modern PoS implementations include penalties that make it economically irrational to validate conflicting blockchain histories.
Which is better?
Experts remain divided on which system offers superior long-term security. The reality is that both systems can be highly secure when properly implemented, with the choice often depending on other factors like energy efficiency, scalability, and governance requirements.
The future of blockchain consensus mechanisms
The evolution of consensus mechanisms continues beyond the PoW versus PoS debate. While these two models dominate current discussions, innovative alternatives are emerging that could reshape how blockchain networks operate in the future.
Hybrid consensus models are gaining attention, combining elements of different mechanisms to balance security, efficiency, and decentralisation. Some networks use PoW for initial block creation and PoS for finalisation, attempting to capture the benefits of both systems while mitigating their individual weaknesses.
Proof of Authority (PoA) systems have found success in enterprise and consortium blockchains where participants are known and trusted. These systems sacrifice some decentralisation for dramatically improved performance and energy efficiency.
Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) represents another variation, where token holders vote for delegates who validate transactions on their behalf.
Emerging mechanisms like Proof of Space, Proof of Burn, and various forms of Proof of Activity are being explored for specific use cases. These alternatives aim to address particular limitations of existing systems or serve specialised applications.
The trend toward environmental sustainability is likely to continue driving innovation in consensus mechanisms. As regulatory pressure increases and institutional adoption grows, networks that can demonstrate minimal environmental impact while maintaining security will have significant advantages.
However, it's unlikely that PoS will completely replace PoW in the near future. Bitcoin's position as digital gold seems secure, and its PoW consensus mechanism is integral to its value proposition. Instead, we're likely to see continued specialisation, with different consensus mechanisms serving different purposes within the broader crypto ecosystem.
Conclusion
The PoW versus PoS debate isn't about declaring a winner, it's about recognising that each serves different purposes in the evolving crypto landscape. Many in the industry consider Bitcoin’s PoW to be a benchmark for security and decentralisation, while PoS networks are becoming the preferred choice for apps requiring speed, efficiency, and environmental sustainability.
Ethereum's successful transition to PoS proved that established networks can evolve without sacrificing security, validating PoS as a mature alternative. As the space develops, expect to see continued specialisation rather than replacement, with different consensus mechanisms optimised for specific use cases.
For investors and enthusiasts, understanding these mechanisms is essential for evaluating projects and predicting where the technology is headed. The consensus mechanism innovation continues to be one of blockchain's most dynamic frontiers.
NEWS AND UPDATES

What's driving the crypto market this week? Get fast, clear updates on the top coins, market trends, and regulation news.
Welcome to Tap’s weekly crypto market recap.
Here are the biggest stories from last week (17 - 23 June).
📢 Vietnam legalised digital assets
The Digital Technology Industry Law, passed by Vietnam’s National Assembly on 14 June, officially recognises and regulates digital assets, a first for the country.
This sets the stage for Vietnam to emerge as a regional crypto hub in Southeast Asia, boosting foreign investment and local innovation in blockchain technologies.
📈 U.S. Senate passes landmark stablecoin bill
The GENIUS Act passed with strong bipartisan support (68–30). It brings federal oversight to stablecoins, including:
- Reserve audits and transparency requirements
- AML compliance for issuers
- Restrictions on congressional trading in stablecoins (though not presidential families)
This law, if passed by the House, could redefine the stablecoin landscape in the U.S.
🇬🇧Liverpool declared UK’s “crypto capital”
A new nationwide study by Openreach has identified Liverpool as the leading UK city in crypto adoption, with 13% of residents actively investing in or trading digital assets. This figure surpasses the national average of 8.5%, positioning Liverpool ahead of traditionally tech-forward cities like London (11%), Manchester (9%), and Birmingham (7%).
🐋 Whales accumulate more Bitcoin
On-chain data from Santiment showed that whale wallets (holding over 1,000 BTC) increased their holdings by 2.3% in the past month, while small retail wallets reduced holdings by 1.8%. This accumulation trend suggests potential upside ahead, especially if whales continue buying.
📊 Bitcoin and Ethereum trade in key ranges
Bitcoin is holding steady between $101,800 and $102,000, showing signs of strength despite market dips over the weekend. Analysts see support from strong ETF inflows and geopolitical pullbacks, which some view as buying opportunities. If Bitcoin breaks above the $107k–$108k range, analysts believe that it could climb toward $145,000 or higher in the second half of the year.
Ethereum, currently trading around $2,240, is under some pressure as it approaches key support levels between $2,300 and $2,400. Still, with growing interest from ETFs and a solid technical setup, analysts believe that ETH could be gearing up for a move back above $3,000 in the coming months.
Stay tuned for next week’s instalment, delivered on Monday mornings.

Explore why Bitcoin and the crypto market are worth $2.1 trillion and why skepticism still lingers among Americans in this deep dive.
Decoding the disconnect: America's cautious approach to crypto
Bitcoin and the broader crypto market have soared to a staggering $2.1 trillion in value, but why does skepticism still linger among so many Americans?
Despite increasing adoption, digital currencies remain shrouded in doubt, revealing a significant trust gap that continues to challenge the industry. As cryptocurrencies become more woven into everyday financial transactions, closing this trust deficit is essential for ensuring sustained growth and mainstream acceptance.
In this article, we'll dive into the key reasons behind this persistent mistrust, uncover the expanding real-world uses of digital assets, and explore how education and technological advancements can help bridge the confidence gap. Keep in mind, the data presented draws from multiple studies, so some figures and age groupings may vary slightly.
A Look at the Current State of Crypto Trust
To truly understand cryptocurrency adoption and the accompanying trust issues, it’s essential to examine the latest statistics and demographic data. This section breaks down public sentiment toward crypto and provides a snapshot of its user base.
General Public Sentiment
Percentage of Americans Who Own Cryptocurrency
Cryptocurrency adoption has seen slow but steady growth over the years. According to surveys conducted by Pew Research Center in 2021 and 2023, 17% of Americans have invested in, traded, or used cryptocurrency, up slightly from 16% in 2021.
While estimates vary, Security.org places this figure higher, estimating that roughly 40% of the U.S. population - around 93 million adults - own some form of cryptocurrency.
Both studies agree that younger generations are driving much of this growth, with 30% of Americans aged 18-29 reporting they have experience with crypto.
Trust Levels in Cryptocurrency
Despite rising adoption rates, trust in cryptocurrency remains a significant hurdle. Pew Research Center found that 75% of Americans have little or no confidence that cryptocurrency exchanges can safeguard their funds. Similarly, a recent report by Morning Consult shows that 7 in 10 consumers familiar with crypto express low or no trust in it.
This contrasts the 31% who have some or high trust, or the 24% in the Pew study who are “somewhat” to “extremely” confident in cryptocurrencies.
Demographics of Crypto Adopters
- Age Groups
Cryptocurrency adoption trends reveal a distinct generational divide. According to the 2023 Morning Consult survey, Gen Z adults (ages 18-25) lead in crypto ownership at 36%, closely followed by Millennials at 30%.
These younger groups are also more inclined toward future investments, with 39% of Gen Z and 45% of Millennials planning to invest in crypto in the coming years. Over half of both generations view cryptocurrency and blockchain as the future, while a notable percentage (27% of Gen Z and 21% of Millennials) considered opening an account with a crypto exchange in the past year.
When compared to other asset classes, data from Bankrate’s 2021 survey reveals that younger Millennials (ages 25-31) favor real estate and stock market investments, while Baby Boomers have the least interest in cryptocurrency. Older Millennials (32-40) lean toward cash investments, with cryptocurrency’s appeal steadily declining with age.
Interestingly, the report also highlights gender differences, showing that 80% of women familiar with crypto express low confidence, compared to 71% of men, indicating a broader trust gap among female users.
- Income Levels
Contrary to common assumptions, cryptocurrency adoption is not confined to high-income individuals. The same Pew Research Center survey revealed that crypto ownership is relatively evenly spread across income brackets:
- 13% of those earning less than $56,600 annually own crypto.
- 19% of those earning between $56,600 and $169,800 own crypto.
- 22% of those earning over $169,800 own crypto.
This data suggests that while higher earners may be more inclined to own cryptocurrency, the appeal of digital assets spans various income levels.
- Educational Background
Education also plays a role in crypto adoption. A 2022 report by Triple-A found that the majority of crypto owners are “highly educated”:
- 24% of crypto owners have graduated from middle or high school.
- 10% have some vocational or college education.
- 39% are college graduates.
- 27% hold postgraduate degrees.
This shows that while those with some college education or a degree are more likely to own crypto, it is not exclusively a pursuit of the highly educated.
This demographic data paints a picture of cryptocurrency adopters as predominantly younger, spread across a range of income levels, and with diverse educational backgrounds. However, the trust gap between crypto and traditional financial systems remains a significant barrier to wider acceptance of digital assets.
Key Trust Barriers
To bridge the gap between cryptocurrency adoption and trust, it’s crucial to understand the major concerns fueling skepticism. This section explores these concerns and contrasts them with similar risks in traditional financial systems.
The Primary Concerns of Skeptics
Volatility
One of the most significant barriers to cryptocurrency adoption is its notorious volatility, particularly for investors seeking stable, long-term assets. Bitcoin, the most well-known cryptocurrency, symbolizes this risk.
In 2022, Bitcoin’s volatility was stark. Its 30-day volatility reached 64.02% in June, driven by broader economic uncertainty and market downturns, compared to the S&P 500’s much lower volatility of 4.71% during the same period.
Over the course of the year, Bitcoin’s price swung from a peak of $47,835 to a low of $18,490, marking a substantial 61% decline from its highest point in 2022. Factors such as rising interest rates, geopolitical tensions, and major crypto market disruptions, like the TerraUSD collapse and Celsius’ liquidity crisis, played a pivotal role.
This extreme volatility reinforces the perception of cryptocurrencies as high-risk investments.
However, traditional stock markets, while typically more stable than crypto, can also experience sharp fluctuations, especially in times of economic stress. For instance, the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX), which measures expected near-term volatility in the U.S. stock market, dropped by 23% to 28.71 on June 30, 2022, far below the 82.69 peak recorded during the early COVID-19 market turbulence in March 2020. This shows that even stock markets, generally seen as safer, can experience moments of intense volatility, particularly during global crises.
Additionally, when compared to the "Magnificent Seven" (a group of top-performing and influential stocks) Bitcoin’s volatility doesn't stand out as unusual. In fact, over the past two years, Bitcoin has shown less volatility than Netflix (NFLX) stock.
On a 90-day timeframe, NFLX had an average realized volatility of 53%, while Bitcoin’s was slightly lower at 46%. The reality is that among all S&P 500 companies, Bitcoin has demonstrated lower annualized historical volatility than 33 of the 503 constituents.
In October 2023, Bitcoin was actually less volatile than 92 stocks in the S&P 500, based on 90-day realized historical volatility figures, including some large-cap and mega-cap companies.
Security
Security concerns are another major hurdle in building trust with cryptocurrencies. Cryptocurrency exchanges and wallets have been targeted by numerous high-profile hacks and frauds, raising doubts about the safety of digital assets. It comes as no surprise that a study from Morning Consult found that 67% of Americans believe having a secure and trustworthy platform is essential to entering the crypto market.
While security threats in the crypto space are well-documented, traditional banking systems are not immune to fraud either. Federal Trade Commission data reveals that consumer fraud losses in the traditional financial sector hit a record high of $10 billion in 2023, marking a 14% increase from the previous year.
Although traditional banks have more safeguards in place to protect consumers, they remain vulnerable to attacks, showing that security is a universal challenge across both crypto and traditional finance.
Prevention remains key, which in this case equates to using only reliable platforms or hardwallets.
Regulatory Uncertainty
Regulatory ambiguity continues to be a critical barrier for both cryptocurrency investors and businesses. The evolving landscape creates uncertainty about the future of digital assets.
Currently, cryptocurrency is legal in 119 countries and four British Overseas Territories, covering more than half of the world’s nations. Notably, 64.7% of these countries are emerging and developing economies, primarily in Asia and Africa.
However, only 62 of these 119 countries (52.1%) have comprehensive regulations in place. This represents significant growth from 2018, when only 33 jurisdictions had formal regulations, showing a 53.2% increase, but still falls short in creating a sense of “unified safety”.
In the United States, regulatory views remain fragmented. Various agencies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), have conflicting perspectives on how to classify and regulate cryptocurrencies. Since 2019, the SEC has filed over 116 crypto-related lawsuits, adding to the regulatory uncertainty faced by the industry.
The Growing Integration Of Digital Assets In Daily Life
As we progress further into the digital age, cryptocurrencies and digital assets are increasingly becoming part of our everyday financial transactions. This shift is driven by two key developments: the rise of crypto payment options and the growing adoption of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs).
According to a MatrixPort report, global cryptocurrency adoption has now reached 7.51% of the population, underscoring the expanding influence of digital currencies worldwide. By 2025, this rate is expected to surpass 8%, signaling a potential shift from niche usage to mainstream acceptance.
The list of major retailers embracing cryptocurrency as a payment method continues to grow. Some notable companies now accepting crypto include:
- Microsoft: Accepts Bitcoin for Xbox store credits.
- AT&T: The first major U.S. mobile carrier to accept crypto payments.
- Whole Foods: Accepts Bitcoin via the Spedn app.
- Overstock: One of the first major retailers to accept Bitcoin.
- Starbucks: Allows customers to load their Starbucks cards with Bitcoin through the Bakkt app.
A 2022 Deloitte survey revealed that nearly 75% of retailers plan to accept either cryptocurrency or stablecoin payments within the next two years. This trend highlights the growing mainstream acceptance of digital assets as a legitimate payment method.
Crypto-backed debit cards are further bridging the gap between digital assets and everyday transactions. These cards enable users to spend their cryptocurrency at any merchant that accepts traditional debit cards.
According to Factual Market Research, the global crypto card market is projected to reach $9.5 billion by 2030, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 31.6% from 2021 to 2030. This growth reflects the increasing popularity of crypto-backed debit cards as a way for consumers to integrate their digital assets into daily spending.
The Rise of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs)
Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) represent digital versions of a country’s fiat currency, issued and regulated by the national monetary authority. In 2024, the global progress of CBDCs has seen a significant uptick, with marked advances in both research and adoption. As of this year:
- 11 countries have fully launched CBDCs, including the Bahamas, Nigeria, Jamaica, and China.
- 44 countries are conducting pilot programs, up from 36, reflecting growing interest in testing the functionality and stability of digital currencies.
- 66 nations are at advanced stages of CBDC development, contributing to a global landscape where 134 countries (accounting for 98% of the world’s economy) are engaged in CBDC projects.
In the United States, the Federal Reserve is exploring the feasibility of a CBDC through Project Hamilton, a collaborative research initiative with MIT. This exploration aligns with broader goals to reduce reliance on cash, enhance financial inclusion, and improve control over national monetary systems amid the rise of digital payments and cryptocurrencies.
The introduction of CBDCs could significantly reshape daily financial transactions in several ways:
- Increased financial inclusion: CBDCs could offer digital payment access to the 1.4 billion adults who remain unbanked, according to World Bank estimates.
- Faster and cheaper transactions: CBDCs could streamline both domestic and cross-border payments, reducing costs and settlement times.
- Enhanced monetary policy: Central banks would gain more direct control over money supply and circulation.
- Improved traceability: CBDCs could help combat financial crimes and reduce tax evasion by providing greater transaction transparency.
However, challenges persist, including concerns about privacy, cybersecurity risks, and the potential disruption of existing banking systems.
As digital assets continue to integrate into everyday life, they hold the potential to transform how we think about and use money. Despite these challenges, trends in both private cryptocurrency adoption and CBDC development point to a future where digital assets play a central role in our financial systems.
Building Trust Through Technology and Education
According to the 2023 Web3 UI/UX Report, nearly 48% of users cite security concerns and asset protection as the primary barriers to crypto adoption. Other challenges include high transaction fees and the steep learning curve needed to fully grasp both the technology and its benefits.
Despite these obstacles, the blockchain sector has made significant strides as it matures, particularly in enhancing security. Hack-related losses in the crypto market dropped from $3.7 billion in 2022 to $1.8 billion in 2023, underscoring the progress in safeguarding digital assets.
The increased adoption of offline hardware wallets and multi-signature wallets, both of which add critical layers of security, reflects this momentum. Advances in smart contract auditing tools and stronger compliance standards are also minimizing risks, creating a safer environment for both users and institutions.
These improvements highlight the industry’s commitment to establishing a more secure foundation for digital transactions and bolstering confidence in blockchain as a reliable financial technology.
In another positive development, in May 2023, the European Council approved the first comprehensive legal framework for the cryptocurrency industry. This legislation sets a new standard for regulatory transparency and oversight, further reinforcing trust.
Financial Literacy Initiatives
The rise of crypto education in the U.S. is playing a pivotal role in increasing public understanding and encouraging adoption. Programs such as Coinbase Earn aim to simplify the onboarding process for new users, directly addressing the complexity and security concerns that often deter people from engaging with crypto.
According to recent data, 43% of respondents feel that insufficient knowledge is a key reason they avoid the sector, highlighting the ongoing need for crypto-related learning.
Additionally, Chainalysis' 2024 Global Crypto Adoption Index noted a significant increase in crypto interest following the launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs in the U.S. earlier in the year. This development enabled investors to trade ETF shares tied to Bitcoin directly on stock exchanges, making it easier to enter the market without needing extensive technical expertise - thus driving a surge in adoption.
These advancements in security and education are gradually fostering greater trust in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. As the sector continues to evolve, these efforts may pave the way for broader adoption and deeper integration of digital assets into daily financial life.
The Future of Digital Asset Adoption
As digital assets continue to evolve and capture mainstream attention, their potential to transform the financial landscape is becoming increasingly evident. From late 2023 through early 2024, global crypto transaction volumes surged, surpassing the peaks of the 2021 bull market (as illustrated below).
Interestingly, much of this growth in adoption was driven by lower-middle income countries, highlighting the global reach of digital assets.
Below, we explore projections for cryptocurrency usage and its potential impact on traditional banking and finance.
Projections for Crypto Usage in the Next 5-10 Years
Several studies and reports offer insights into the expected growth of cryptocurrency over the next decade:
Global Adoption
The global cryptocurrency market revenue is projected to reach approximately $56.7 billion in 2024, with the United States leading the charge, expected to generate around $9.8 billion in revenue. Statista predicts the number of global crypto users will hit 861 million by 2025, marking a significant shift toward mainstream use.
Institutional Adoption
The 2023 Institutional Investor Digital Assets Study found that 65% of the 1,042 institutional investors surveyed plan to buy or invest in digital assets in the future.
As of 2024, digital currency usage among U.S. organisations is expanding, particularly in sectors such as finance, retail, and technology. Hundreds of financial services and fintech firms are now involved in digital assets, whether in payment processing, investments, or blockchain-based applications. This includes major companies utilising cryptocurrencies as stored value and exploring stablecoin use cases to enhance transaction efficiency.
Notably, major U.S. companies are increasingly engaging with blockchain and digital assets, as regulatory clarity improves and security concerns are addressed.
Retail Adoption
At present, about 85% of major retailers generating over $1 billion in annual online sales accept cryptocurrency payments. In contrast, 23% of mid-sized retailers, with online sales between $250 million and $1 billion, currently accept crypto payments. This growing trend points to an expanding role for digital assets in retail, especially among large-scale businesses.
Potential Impact on Traditional Banking and Finance
The rise of digital asset utilisation is poised to reshape traditional banking systems in multiple areas. For starters, the growth of blockchain technology and digitised financial services is driving the decentralised finance (DeFi) market, which is projected to reach $450 billion by 2030, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 46%.
In Q3 2024 alone, trading on decentralised exchanges surpassed $100 billion, marking the third consecutive month of growth in trading volume. This trend underscores the increasing interest and activity in the decentralised finance space.
As Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) are likely to be adopted by 80% of central banks by 2030, the role of commercial banks in money distribution could diminish significantly. Meanwhile, blockchain technology and stablecoins are expected to revolutionise cross-border B2B payments, with 20% of these transactions powered by blockchain by 2025. Stablecoin payment volumes are projected to hit $620 billion by 2026.
Furthermore, the investment landscape is set to evolve as asset tokenisation scales, potentially reaching a value of $16 trillion, making crypto a standard component in investment portfolios.
With regulatory clarity expected to improve - more than half of financial institutions anticipate clearer rules within the next three years - crypto integration is likely to become more widespread. These developments emphasise the transformative potential of digital assets across payments, investments, and financial structures globally.
Bridging the trust gap in crypto adoption
The cryptocurrency landscape is experiencing a surge in institutional interest, which could be a pivotal moment for integrating digital assets into traditional finance. Financial giants like BlackRock are at the forefront of this movement, signaling a shift in mainstream perception and adoption of cryptocurrencies.
Historically, the introduction of new investment vehicles around Bitcoin has spurred market growth. As Markus Thielen, founder of 10x Research, highlights, the launch of spot ETFs could bring about a new wave of institutional involvement, potentially driving the next phase of market expansion.
This growing institutional momentum, combined with evolving regulatory frameworks, is reshaping the crypto ecosystem. However, a key question remains: Will these developments be enough to close the trust gap and push cryptocurrencies into mainstream adoption?
As we stand at this crossroads, the future of digital assets hangs in the balance. The coming years will be critical in determining whether cryptocurrencies can overcome persistent skepticism and fully integrate into the global financial system, or if they will remain a niche, yet impactful, financial instrument.

Millennials and Gen Z are revolutionizing the financial landscape, leveraging cryptocurrencies to challenge traditional systems and redefine money itself. Curious about how this shift affects your financial future? Let's uncover the powerful changes they’re driving!
The financial world is undergoing a significant transformation, largely driven by Millennials and Gen Z. These digital-native generations are embracing cryptocurrencies at an unprecedented rate, challenging traditional financial systems and catalysing a shift toward new forms of digital finance, redefining how we perceive and interact with money.
This movement is not just a fleeting trend but a fundamental change that is redefining how we perceive and interact with money.
Digital Natives Leading the Way
Growing up in the digital age, Millennials (born 1981-1996) and Gen Z (born 1997-2012) are inherently comfortable with technology. This familiarity extends to their financial behaviours, with a noticeable inclination toward adopting innovative solutions like cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology.
According to the Grayscale Investments and Harris Poll Report which studied Americans, 44% agree that “crypto and blockchain technology are the future of finance.” Looking more closely at the demographics, Millenials and Gen Z’s expressed the highest levels of enthusiasm, underscoring the pivotal role younger generations play in driving cryptocurrency adoption.
Desire for Financial Empowerment and Inclusion
Economic challenges such as the 2008 financial crisis and the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have shaped these generations' perspectives on traditional finance. There's a growing scepticism toward conventional financial institutions and a desire for greater control over personal finances.
The Grayscale-Harris Poll found that 23% of those surveyed believe that cryptocurrencies are a long-term investment, up from 19% the previous year. The report also found that 41% of participants are currently paying more attention to Bitcoin and other crypto assets because of geopolitical tensions, inflation, and a weakening US dollar (up from 34%).
This sentiment fuels engagement with cryptocurrencies as viable investment assets and tools for financial empowerment.
Influence on Market Dynamics
The collective financial influence of Millennials and Gen Z is significant. Their active participation in cryptocurrency markets contributes to increased liquidity and shapes market trends. Social media platforms like Reddit, Twitter, and TikTok have become pivotal in disseminating information and investment strategies among these generations.
The rise of cryptocurrencies like Dogecoin and Shiba Inu demonstrates how younger investors leverage online communities to impact financial markets2. This phenomenon shows their ability to mobilise and drive market movements, challenging traditional investment paradigms.
Embracing Innovation and Technological Advancement
Cryptocurrencies represent more than just investment opportunities; they embody technological innovation that resonates with Millennials and Gen Z. Blockchain technology and digital assets are areas where these generations are not only users but also contributors.
A 2021 survey by Pew Research Center indicated that 31% of Americans aged 18-29 have invested in, traded, or used cryptocurrency, compared to just 8% of those aged 50-64. This significant disparity highlights the generational embrace of digital assets and the technologies underpinning them.
Impact on Traditional Financial Institutions
The shift toward cryptocurrencies is prompting traditional financial institutions to adapt. Banks, investment firms, and payment platforms are increasingly integrating crypto services to meet the evolving demands of younger clients.
Companies like PayPal and Square have expanded their cryptocurrency offerings, allowing users to buy, hold, and sell cryptocurrencies directly from their platforms. These developments signify the financial industry's recognition of the growing importance of cryptocurrencies.
Challenges and Considerations
While enthusiasm is high, challenges such as regulatory uncertainties, security concerns, and market volatility remain. However, Millennials and Gen Z appear willing to navigate these risks, drawn by the potential rewards and alignment with their values of innovation and financial autonomy.
In summary
Millennials and Gen Z are redefining the financial landscape, with their embrace of cryptocurrencies serving as a catalyst for broader change. This isn't just about alternative investments; it's a shift in how younger generations view financial systems and their place within them. Their drive for autonomy, transparency, and technological integration is pushing traditional institutions to innovate rapidly.
This generational influence extends beyond personal finance, potentially reshaping global economic structures. For industry players, from established banks to fintech startups, adapting to these changing preferences isn't just advantageous—it's essential for long-term viability.
As cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology mature, we're likely to see further transformations in how society interacts with money. Those who can navigate this evolving landscape, balancing innovation with stability, will be well-positioned for the future of finance. It's a complex shift, but one that offers exciting possibilities for a more inclusive and technologically advanced financial ecosystem. The financial world is changing, and it's the young guns who are calling the shots.

You might have heard of the "Travel Rule" before, but do you know what it actually mean? Let us dive into it for you.
What is the "Travel Rule"?
You might have heard of the "Travel Rule" before, but do you know what it actually mean? Well, let me break it down for you. The Travel Rule, also known as FATF Recommendation 16, is a set of measures aimed at combating money laundering and terrorism financing through financial transactions.
So, why is it called the Travel Rule? It's because the personal data of the transacting parties "travels" with the transfers, making it easier for authorities to monitor and regulate these transactions. See, now it all makes sense!
The Travel Rule applies to financial institutions engaged in virtual asset transfers and crypto companies, collectively referred to as virtual asset service providers (VASPs). These VASPs have to obtain and share "required and accurate originator information and required beneficiary information" with counterparty VASPs or financial institutions during or before the transaction.
To make things more practical, the FATF recommends that countries adopt a de minimis threshold of 1,000 USD/EUR for virtual asset transfers. This means that transactions below this threshold would have fewer requirements compared to those exceeding it.
For transfers of Virtual Assets falling below the de minimis threshold, Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) are required to gather:
- The identities of the sender (originator) and receiver (beneficiary).
- Either the wallet address associated with each transaction involving Virtual Assets (VAs) or a unique reference number assigned to the transaction.
- Verification of this gathered data is not obligatory, unless any suspicious circumstances concerning money laundering or terrorism financing arise. In such instances, it becomes essential to verify customer information.
Conversely, for transfers surpassing the de minimis threshold, VASPs are obligated to collect more extensive particulars, encompassing:
- Full name of the sender (originator).
- The account number employed by the sender (originator) for processing the transaction, such as a wallet address.
- The physical (geographical) address of the sender (originator), national identity number, a customer identification number that uniquely distinguishes the sender to the ordering institution, or details like date and place of birth.
- Name of the receiver (beneficiary).
- Account number of the receiver (beneficiary) utilized for transaction processing, similar to a wallet address.
By following these guidelines, virtual asset service providers can contribute to a safer and more transparent virtual asset ecosystem while complying with international regulations on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism. It's all about ensuring the integrity of financial transactions and safeguarding against illicit activities.
Implementation of the Travel Rule in the United Kingdom
A notable shift is anticipated in the United Kingdom's oversight of the virtual asset sector, commencing September 1, 2023.
This seminal development comes in the form of the Travel Rule, which falls under Part 7A of the Money Laundering Regulations 2017. Designed to combat money laundering and terrorist financing within the virtual asset industry, this new regulation expands the information-sharing requirements for wire transfers to encompass virtual asset transfers.
The HM Treasury of the UK has meticulously customized the provisions of the revised Wire Transfer Regulations to cater to the unique demands of the virtual asset sector. This underscores the government's unwavering commitment to fostering a secure and transparent financial ecosystem. Concurrently, it signals their resolve to enable the virtual asset industry to flourish.
The Travel Rule itself originates from the updated version of the Financial Action Task Force's recommendation on information-sharing requirements for wire transfers. By extending these recommendations to cover virtual asset transfers, the UK aspires to significantly mitigate the risk of illicit activities within the sector.
Undoubtedly, the Travel Rule heralds a landmark stride forward in regulating the virtual asset industry in the UK. By extending the ambit of information-sharing requirements and fortifying oversight over virtual asset firms
Implementation of the Travel Rule in the European Union
Prepare yourself, as a new regulation called the Travel Rule is set to be introduced in the world of virtual assets within the European Union. Effective from December 30, 2024, this rule will take effect precisely 18 months after the initial enforcement of the Transfer of Funds Regulation.
Let's delve into the details of the Travel Rule. When it comes to information requirements, there will be no distinction made between cross-border transfers and transfers within the EU. The revised Transfer of Funds regulation recognizes all virtual asset transfers as cross-border, acknowledging the borderless nature and global reach of such transactions and services.
Now, let's discuss compliance obligations. To ensure adherence to these regulations, European Crypto Asset Service Providers (CASPs) must comply with certain measures. For transactions exceeding 1,000 EUR with self-hosted wallets, CASPs are obligated to collect crucial originator and beneficiary information. Additionally, CASPs are required to fulfill additional wallet verification obligations.
The implementation of these measures within the European Union aims to enhance transparency and mitigate potential risks associated with virtual asset transfers. For individuals involved in this domain, it is of utmost importance to stay informed and adhere to these new guidelines in order to ensure compliance.
What does the travel rules means to me as user?
As a user in the virtual asset industry, the implementation of the Travel Rule brings some significant changes that are designed to enhance the security and transparency of financial transactions. This means that when you engage in virtual asset transfers, certain personal information will now be shared between the involved parties. While this might sound intrusive at first, it plays a crucial role in combating fraud, money laundering, and terrorist financing.
The Travel Rule aims to create a safer environment for individuals like you by reducing the risks associated with illicit activities. This means that you can have greater confidence in the legitimacy of the virtual asset transactions you engage in. The regulation aims to weed out illicit activities and promote a level playing field for legitimate users. This fosters trust and confidence among users, attracting more participants and further driving the growth and development of the industry.
However, it's important to note that complying with this rule may require you to provide additional information to virtual asset service providers. Your privacy and the protection of your personal data remain paramount, and service providers are bound by strict regulations to ensure the security of your information.
In summary, the Travel Rule is a positive development for digital asset users like yourself, as it contributes to a more secure and trustworthy virtual asset industry.
Unlocking Compliance and Seamless Experiences: Tap's Proactive Approach to Upcoming Regulations
Tap is fully committed to upholding regulatory compliance, while also prioritizing a seamless and enjoyable customer experience. In order to achieve this delicate balance, Tap has proactively sought out partnerships with trusted solution providers and is actively engaged in industry working groups. By collaborating with experts in the field, Tap ensures it remains on the cutting edge of best practices and innovative solutions.
These efforts not only demonstrate Tap's dedication to compliance, but also contribute to creating a secure and transparent environment for its users. By staying ahead of the curve, Tap can foster trust and confidence in the cryptocurrency ecosystem, reassuring customers that their financial transactions are safe and protected.
But Tap's commitment to compliance doesn't mean sacrificing user experience. On the contrary, Tap understands the importance of providing a seamless journey for its customers. This means that while regulatory requirements may be changing, Tap is working diligently to ensure that users can continue to enjoy a smooth and hassle-free experience.
By combining a proactive approach to compliance with a determination to maintain user satisfaction, Tap is setting itself apart as a trusted leader in the financial technology industry. So rest assured, as Tap evolves in response to new regulations, your experience as a customer will remain top-notch and worry-free.
Unveiling the future of money: Explore the game-changing Central Bank Digital Currencies and their potential impact on finance.
Since the debut of Bitcoin in 2009, central banks have been living in fear of the disruptive technology that is cryptocurrency. Distributed ledger technology has revolutionized the digital world and has continued to challenge the corruption of central bank morals.
Financial institutions can’t beat or control cryptocurrency, so they are joining them in creating digital currencies. Governments have now been embracing digital currencies in the form of CBDCs, otherwise known as central bank digital currencies.
Central bank digital currencies are digital tokens, similar to cryptocurrency, issued by a central bank. They are pegged to the value of that country's fiat currency, acting as a digital currency version of the national currency. CBDCs are created and regulated by a country's central bank and monetary authorities.
A central bank digital currency is generally created for a sense of financial inclusion and to improve the application of monetary and fiscal policy. Central banks adopting currency in digital form presents great benefits for the federal reserve system as well as citizens, but there are some cons lurking behind the central bank digital currency facade.
Types of central bank digital currencies
While the concept of a central bank digital currency is quite easy to understand, there are layers to central bank money in its digital form. Before we take a deep dive into the possibilities presented by the central banks and their digital money, we will break down the different types of central bank digital currencies.
Wholesale CBDCs
Wholesale central bank digital currencies are targeted at financial institutions, whereby reserve balances are held within a central bank. This integration assists the financial system and institutions in improving payment systems and security payment efficiency.
This is much simpler than rolling out a central bank digital currency to the whole country but provides support for large businesses when they want to transfer money. These digital payments would also act as a digital ledger and aid in the avoidance of money laundering.
Retail CBDCs
A retail central bank digital currency refers to government-backed digital assets used between businesses and customers. This type of central bank digital currency is aimed at traditional currency, acting as a digital version of physical currency. These digital assets would allow retail payment systems, direct P2P CBDC transactions, as well as international settlements among businesses. It would be similar to having a bank account, where you could digitally transfer money through commercial banks, except the currency would be in the form of a digital yuan or euro, rather than the federal reserve of currency held by central banks.
Pros and cons of a central bank digital currency (CBDC)
Central banks are looking for ways to keep their money in the country, as opposed to it being spent on buying cryptocurrencies, thus losing it to a global market. As digital currencies become more popular, each central bank must decide whether they want to fight it or profit from the potential. Regardless of adoption, central banks creating their own digital currencies comes with benefits and disadvantages to users that you need to know.
Pros of central bank digital currency (CBDC)
- Cross border payments
- Track money laundering activity
- Secure international monetary fund
- Reduces risk of commercial bank collapse
- Cheaper
- More secure
- Promotes financial inclusion
Cons of central bank digital currency (CDBC)
- Central banks have complete control
- No anonymity of digital currency transfers
- Cybersecurity issues
- Price reliant on fiat currency equivalent
- Physical money may be eliminated
- Ban of distributed ledger technology and cryptocurrency
Central bank digital currency conclusion
Central bank money in an electronic form has been a big debate in the blockchain technology space, with so many countries considering the possibility. The European Central Bank, as well as other central banks, have been considering the possibility of central bank digital currencies as a means of improving the financial system. The Chinese government is in the midst of testing out their e-CNY, which some are calling the digital yuan. They have seen great success so far, but only after completely banning Bitcoin trading.
There is a lot of good that can come from CBDCs, but the benefits are mostly for the federal reserve system and central banks. Bank-account holders and citizens may have their privacy compromised and their investment options limited if the world adopts CBDCs.
It's important to remember that central bank digital currencies are not cryptocurrencies. They do not compete with cryptocurrencies and the benefits of blockchain technology. Their limited use cases can only be applied when reinforced by a financial system authority. Only time will tell if CBDCs will succeed, but right now you can appreciate the advantages brought to you by crypto.
Tap makes entering the Bitcoin world simple. Buy, sell, hold, and trade Bitcoin easily on our secure platform.
Welcome to this week's Crypto Update, your go-to destination for the latest news in the exciting world of cryptocurrencies. Let's dive right into the highlights of the past week in the dynamic crypto market.
Etherscan's AI Tool for Smart Contracts:
Etherscan has launched Code Reader, an advanced tool that utilizes AI to retrieve and interpret source code from specific Ethereum contract addresses. Code Reader leverages OpenAI's powerful language model to generate comprehensive insights into contract source code files. The tool allows users to gain a deeper understanding of contract code, access comprehensive lists of smart contract functions, and explore contract interactions with decentralized applications. To access and utilize Code Reader, users need a valid OpenAI API Key and sufficient OpenAI usage limits. However, researchers caution about the challenges posed by current AI models, including computing power limitations, data synchronization, network optimization, and privacy concerns.
SEC's increased scrutiny on cryptocurrencies sparks debate:
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) increased scrutiny has led to a prominent debate concerning the future of XRP and Ethereum. Max Keiser, a well-known Bitcoin advocate, predicts the downfall of XRP and Ethereum due to regulatory overreach. In contrast, John Deaton, representing XRP holders, opposes this view, arguing for a more balanced regulatory approach. The cryptocurrency community is now anxiously awaiting regulatory clarity, as the SEC's actions remain unpredictable.
It's important to note that the regulatory environment is constantly evolving and can have significant impacts on the cryptocurrency market, including Ethereum. Therefore, it is advisable to stay informed about the latest developments.
A Call for Clarity: Federal reserve governor advocates for clearer crypto regulations:
Michelle Bowman, a Federal Reserve Governor, has urged global regulators to establish clearer regulations for emerging banking activities, particularly banking as a service and digital assets. She emphasized the need for a well-defined regulatory framework to address the supervisory void and uncertainties that financial institutions currently face. Bowman's call aligns with the growing demand for enhanced regulation of digital assets. A robust and comprehensive regulatory framework is crucial for ensuring the stability and integrity of the banking sector, mitigating risks, protecting consumers, and fostering innovation.
Turkish lira hit a record low against the US dollar
The Turkish lira hit a historic low, trading at 25.74 per US dollar, following Turkey's central bank decision to raise interest rates by 650 basis points to 15%. While the hike was expected, it fell short of the anticipated 21%, and analysts believe a larger increase was needed to show the government's resolve to fight inflation. The lira's devaluation has been part of a larger trend, prompting citizens to invest in alternative assets like digital currencies and gold. The central bank, now under new leadership, has adopted a more gradual approach to rate adjustments, seeking to stabilize the economy. However, the uncertainty surrounding Turkey's economic future persists.
Biggest Movers on Tap - Last 7 days


The lessons learned from FTX's downfall: understanding the implications of crypto regulations and why they are more important than ever.
The recent fall of FTX comes with devastating consequences to many, cooling the conditions of an already chilly crypto winter. While the loss of consumer funds and the drop in crypto prices across the board are detrimental to many in the new-age financial system and it’s anticipation of regulators’ reactions that are adding to the hysteria.
After taking a deep dive into exactly what happened at FTX, we take a look at the response from regulators and what this is likely to mean for the greater crypto industry.
The FTX death spiral and its effects on the crypto financial system
The history
To understand the full demise of FTX, one needs to understand its history. In 2019, when FTX launched, Binance was a prominent investor and partner. CEOs, Sam Bankman-Fried (FTX) and Changpeng Zhao (Binance) had a mutually beneficial strategic partnership and amicable relationship.
This soured as FTX grew in size and they became the two top centralized entities in the crypto ecosystem, and ultimately largest competitors. Just last year, both exchanges accounted for roughly 30% of trading volume on crypto exchanges, accounting for over $27.5 trillion.
The breakup
In 2021, things reached a pinnacle point in their relationship and FTX bought Binance out of the partnership, paying $2.1 billion, much of that with FTT, the platform’s native token. Fast forward to November 2022 and Changpeng Zhao (CZ) tweeted that he would be liquidating the FTT crypto assets as a result of Sam Bankman-Fried speaking ill of Binance to regulators and other “recent revelations”.
The allegations
It is believed these revelations were that FTX’s sister trading company, Alameda Research, was in financial trouble, an allegation made by Coindesk and Mike Burgersburg, the man who accurately predicted the Celsius crash. At this point, we should mention that Alameda and FTX’s combined FTT holdings account for 75% of the entire supply.
With Binance announcing that they were going to sell their crypto assets, accounting for 7.4% of the entire FTT supply, shockwaves were sent through the industry.
The consequences
In a matter of hours, the FTT price dropped 83%, trading at $18.72 before dropping to $3.14. In a desperate attempt to stabilize the market, Alameda offered to buy Binance’s FTT supply, to no avail.
At the same time, investors rushed to pull their funds from the exchange, estimated to be roughly $6 billion worth of net withdrawals. In light of the recent Terra LUNA crash and subsequent demise of Celsius and Voyager, investors were taking no risks.
The next twist in this unfortunate story is that FTX froze all withdrawals on the platform and announced that it was going into a “strategic transaction” with Binance, with Binance set to buy its biggest competitor. The acquisition was rumored to be worth $1.
This all came crashing down several hours later when CZ announced to his Twitter following that after reviewing the books they would no longer be moving forward with this plan.
Within 24 hours, the broader crypto assets market started to feel the effects. Bitcoin was down 16%, Ethereum down 24% and Solana, widely backed by Sam Bankman-Fried, down 43%.
On November 10, Sam Bankman-Fried announced that Alameda Research would be “winding down trading” and issued an apology to his Twitter following. FTX is in the process of sourcing funding for liquidity purposes, with the platform estimated to need around $10 billion in order to honor customers' crypto assets withdrawal requests.
What was really going on at FTX?
This story boils down to CZ tweeting that he would sell his FTT in light of allegations, which created mass FUD and subsequently led to the demise of its biggest competitor. How did a company, considered a heavyweight in the financial markets, worth $30 billion a few months prior and making 8 figures in revenue a day suddenly become insolvent?
Industry insiders believe that the relationship between FTX and Alameda was a bit more reprehensible than it appeared on the surface. Based on leaked insights into Alameda’s financials, it is speculated that Alameda used a significant portion of its FTT holdings as collateral to borrow funds from FTX (these funds being customer funds).
While illegal, this also poses a high risk that could see the collapse of both platforms, and consumer funds along with them. If this is proven to be true, jail time could ensue.
In an internal email circulated to the Binance team, CZ stated that this was not part of a greater plan, nor is it a win for Binance as the greater crypto economy will be affected. From investor trust to crypto prices dropping to the hawk-eyed regulators eagerly watching from the sidelines, the demise of FTX is in no one’s favor.
Ultimately, the same catalyst that saw the fall of Celsius has been observed here, FTX used its own token as collateral. Let this be a warning sign for any future trading platforms, and a prominent note for those working on crypto regulation.
What this means for the regulation of crypto exchanges
Before any regulators could even whisper a word, big platforms like Binance, KuCoin, OKX and more are believed to be in plans to implement Proof of Reserves accountability. This involves an independent audit of funds by a third party, made available to the public.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ), three of the biggest financial regulators in the U.S. have begun (or are continuing, in some cases) investigations into FTX. It is believed that the Texas Securities Board started investigating the exchange and CEO in October.
In the wake of the aftermath, the White House is also calling for stronger crypto oversights and Californian regulators have announced that they are launching an investigation into FTX, asking customers affected by the virtual currency calamity to come forward.
Insiders are faulting U.S. regulators for not having more clear guidelines in place, saying that their “stringent-yet-unclear” frameworks have driven big exchanges overseas where there is even less of a regulatory landscape and taxes often go unpaid. With the proper legal framework in place, perhaps situations like these could be avoided, and instead of fleeing, people would trust in U.S. regulatory standards.
Regulators need to find a balance between creating and implementing legal frameworks that both support the innovation and development of the crypto space but at the same time keep avaricious CEOs in line and all centralized operations above board.
Regulations put in place to hinder money laundering have been successful, with little consequence to the trader. There is no reason why regulations implemented to stop such happenings in the crypto world could not have the same success.
The latest crisis in the cryptocurrency space is likely to push regulators to amplify their work on building legal frameworks for platforms managing digital assets to adhere to, not just in the U.S., but globally.
What this means for crypto assets and the crypto industry
While Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana and most other cryptocurrencies are recovering from lows of yesterday, there is a somber feeling in the crypto space knowing that to the week a year ago Bitcoin and Ethereum reached their current all-time highs.
Crypto trading is known to have its risks, and the responsibility to stay within the green lines falls on the individual trader. While many investors embrace the “hodl” approach (hold the investment for long periods of time), it is of the utmost importance to stay in the know about what is happening in the market and to thoroughly, very thoroughly vet the coin they are looking to invest in.
Another, perhaps most important, precaution to take is to work only with crypto platforms that are regulated by government-endorsed financial bodies. Just because you are working with decentralized digital currencies doesn’t mean that you should throw caution to the wind and leave your funds unprotected.
Taking this very seriously, Tap is licensed and regulated by the Gibraltar Financial Services Commission and insures all funds through a reputable crypto insurance service. Rest assured that we are constantly being regulated, sticking to the stringent guidelines laid out before us, and protecting our consumers’ funds at all times.

2022 was a rollercoaster for crypto investors. Explore the reasons behind the crashes of Terra and Celsius and what the future holds.
There is seldom a dull moment in the cryptosphere. In a matter of weeks, crypto winters can turn into bull runs, high-profile celebrities can send the price of a cryptocurrency to an all-time high and big networks can go from hero to bankruptcy. While we await the next bull run, let’s dissect some of the bigger moments of this year so far.
In a matter of weeks, we saw two major cryptocurrencies drop significantly in value and later declare themselves bankrupt. Not only did these companies lose millions, but millions of investors lost immense amounts of money.
As some media sources use these stories as an opportunity to spread FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) about the crypto industry, in this article we’ll look at what affected these particular networks. This is not the “norm” when it comes to investing in digital assets, these are cases of not doing enough thorough research.
The Downfall of Terra
Terra is a blockchain platform that offered several cryptocurrencies (mostly stablecoins), most notably the stablecoin TerraUST (UST) and Terra (LUNA). LUNA tokens played an integral role in maintaining the price of the algorithmic stablecoins, incentivizing trading between LUNA and stablecoins should they need to increase or decrease a stablecoin's supply.
In December 2021, following a token burn, LUNA entered the top 10 biggest cryptocurrencies by market cap trading at $75. LUNA’s success was tied to that of UST. In April, UST overtook Binance USD to become the third-largest stablecoin in the cryptocurrency market. The Anchor protocol of the Terra ecosystem, which offers returns as high as 20% APY, aided UST's rise.
In May of 2022, UST unpegged from its $1 position, sending LUNA into a tailspin losing 99.9% of its value in a matter of days. The coin’s market cap dipped from $41b to $6.6m. The demise of the platform led to $60 billion of investors’ money going down the drain. So, what went wrong?
After a large sell-off of UST in early May, the stablecoin began to depeg. This caused a further mass sell-off of the algorithmic cryptocurrency causing mass amounts of LUNA to be minted to maintain its price equilibrium. This sent LUNA's circulating supply sky-rocketing, in turn crashing the price of the once top ten coin. The circulating supply of LUNA went from around 345 million to 3.47 billion in a matter of days.
As investors scrambled to try to liquidate their assets, the damage was already done. The Luna Foundation Guard (LFG) had been acquiring large quantities of Bitcoin as a safeguard against the UST stablecoin unpegging, however, this did not prove to help as the network's tokens had already entered what's known as a "death spiral".
The LFG and Do Kwon reported bought $3 billion worth of Bitcoin and stored it in reserves should they need to use them for an unpegging. When the time came they claimed to have sold around 80,000 BTC, causing havoc on the rest of the market. Following these actions, the Bitcoin price dipped below $30,000, and continued to do so.
After losing nearly 100% of its value, the Terra blockchain halted services and went into overdrive to try and rectify the situation. As large exchanges started delisting both coins one by one, Terra’s founder Do Kwon released a recovery plan. While this had an effect on the coin’s price, rising to $4.46, it soon ran its course sending LUNA’s price below $1 again.
In a final attempt to rectify the situation, Do Kwon alongside co-founder Daniel Shin hard forked the Terra blockchain to create a new version, renaming the original blockchain Terra Classic. The platform then released a new coin, Luna 2.0, while the original LUNA coin was renamed LUNC.
Reviewing the situation in hindsight, a Web3 investor and venture partner at Farmer Fund, Stuti Pandey said, “What the Luna ecosystem did was they had a very aggressive and optimistic monetary policy that pretty much worked when markets were going very well, but they had a very weak monetary policy for when we encounter bear markets.”
Then Celsius Froze Over
In mid-June 2022, Celsius, a blockchain-based platform that specializes in crypto loans and borrowing, halted all withdrawals citing “extreme market conditions”. Following a month of turmoil, Celsius officially announced that it had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in July.
Just a year earlier, in June 2021, the platform’s native token CEL had reached its all-time high of $8.02 with a market cap of $1.9 billion. Following the platform’s upheaval, at the time of writing CEL was trading at $1.18 with a market cap of $281 million.
According to court filings, when the platform filed for bankruptcy it was $1.2 billion in the red with $5.5 billion in liabilities, of which $4.7 billion is customer holdings. A far cry from its reign as one of the most successful DeFi (decentralized finance) platforms. What led to this demise?
Last year, the platform faced its first minor bump in the road when the US states of Texas, Alabama and New Jersey took legal action against the company for allegedly selling unregistered securities to users.
Then, in April 2022, following pressure from regulators, Celsius also stopped providing interest-bearing accounts to non-accredited investors. While against the nature of DeFi, the company was left with little choice.
Things then hit the fan in May of this year. The collapse of LUNA and UST caused significant damage to investor confidence across the entire cryptocurrency market. This is believed to have accelerated the start of a "crypto winter" and led to an industry-wide sell-off that produced a bank-run-style series of withdrawals by Celsius users. In bankruptcy documents, Celsius attributes its liquidity problems to the "domino effect" of LUNA's failure.
According to the company, Celsius had 1.7 million users and $11.7 billion worth of assets under management (AUM) and had made over $8 billion in loans alongside its very high APY (annual percentage yields) of 17%.
These loans, however, came to a grinding halt when the platform froze all its clients' assets and announced a company-wide freeze on withdrawals in early June.
Celsius released a statement stating: “Due to extreme market conditions, today we are announcing that Celsius is pausing all withdrawals, Swap, and transfers between accounts. We are taking this necessary action for the benefit of our entire community to stabilize liquidity and operations while we take steps to preserve and protect assets.”
Two weeks later the platform hired restructuring expert Alvarez & Marsal to assist with alleviating the damage caused by June’s uncertainty and the mounting liquidity issues.
As of mid-July, after paying off several loans, Celsius filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.
Final Thoughts
The biggest takeaway from these examples above it to always do your own research when it comes to investing in cryptocurrency or cryptocurrency platforms. Never chase “get-rich-quick” schemes, instead do your due diligence and read the fine print. If a platform is offering 20% APY, be sure to get to the bottom of how they intend to provide this. If there’s no transparency, there should be no investment.
The cryptocurrency market has been faced with copious amounts of stressors in recent months, from the demise of these networks mentioned above (alongside others like Voyager and Three Anchor Capital) to a market-wide liquidity crunch, to the recent inflation rate increases around the globe. Not to mention the fearful anticipation of regulatory changes.
If there’s one thing we know about cryptocurrencies it’s that the market as a whole is incredibly resilient. In recent weeks, prices of top cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum have slowly started to increase, causing speculation that we might finally be making our way out of the crypto winter. While this won’t be an overnight endeavour, the sentiment in the market remains hopeful.
LATEST ARTICLE

Index funds are an increasingly popular form of investment that offers investors a low-cost, passive way to gain exposure to a broad range of assets. With minimal management fees and no need for active trading decisions, index funds can provide investors with higher returns at lower costs than more traditional forms of investing.
What is an index fund?
An index fund is a type of mutual fund or exchange-traded fund (ETF) composed of a basket of stocks or bonds that tracks a specific stock market index such as the S&P 500 or Dow Jones Industrial Average. These might also be referred to as index mutual funds.
Unlike actively managed funds, which attempt to beat their respective benchmarks through security selection, index funds strive to replicate their underlying market indexes by holding all (or substantially all) of their components in similar proportions.
This makes index mutual funds more cost-effective than actively managed funds since they incur fewer trading costs and require less research and fewer management fees. On top of that, since they track established indexes, investors can benefit from the diversification within the asset class without having to pick individual stocks themselves.
Index funds provide an easy way for investors with any level of experience or resources to access some of the market's best-performing assets at a minimal cost. Index mutual funds are also favored for long-term investment strategies such as retirement funds.
How do index funds work?
Index funds, also commonly referred to as "indexing", follows a passive form of investing (unlike traditional mutual funds that are typically actively managed funds). Instead of fund managers actively trading a variety of stocks, index funds are built by mirroring the securities of a particular index and holding them.
The key notion is that by mirroring the profile of the index or stock market, the fund will match its overall performance. For example, over the last thirty years, the S&P 500 has grown an average of 10.7% per annum, which its index mutual fund will mimic.
While the most popular index fund tracks the S&P 500, other prominent index mutual funds include:
The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index
Which tracks the bond market.
The MSCI EAFE Index
Which tracks foreign stocks in Europe, Australasia, and the Far East.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA)
Which tracks 30 large-cap companies listed on the stock exchange.
The index fund portfolio holdings will remain as is unless there is a significant change in the market's benchmark index. Benchmarks are used to measure the performance of the market indexes and will influence whether any changes to the composition of the portfolio need to be made. If changes are necessary, managers will rebalance the percentage of securities as necessary.
Passive vs actively managed funds
Both mutual funds and index funds are great investments, however, they differ slightly in how they operate and the returns one can expect. As with any investment endeavor, investing involves risk.
Actively managed funds
An actively managed investment fund offers investors access to an experienced team of financial professionals or simply a fund manager who makes knowledgeable decisions about where and how to allocate the funds across asset classes. This generally enables larger returns than traditional passive investing.
Typically, many mutual funds are actively managed funds, however, it's best not to assume a fund is actively or passively managed simply based on the fund type. There are plenty of funds that break this rule, like actively managed exchange-traded funds.
The advantages of an actively managed fund are that it can earn higher returns and beat the market index. It's important to note that this is not a guarantee so it's best to check the history of the fund you wish to invest in beforehand and the performance of the team managing it.
It's also worth noting that when the mutual fund sells individual stocks it incurs fees and taxes which will affect the fund's performance. Investors are also required to pay a flat fee despite the performance of the actively managed mutual funds, which could result in the mutual fund underperforming the market index.
Passively managed funds
On the other hand, a passively invested fund mimics a market index and does not have a fund manager or team of fund managers making decisions on what and when to invest.
With passive funds, there are fewer decisions to be made and trades to execute, which allows for less effort and lower fees. Automating the bulk of a passively managed index mutual fund makes it much more cost-effective than paying professionals to determine when and what should be bought or sold.
Typically, an index fund will fall into this category as it does not require full-on management. Once the index on which it will mimic is established, the shares are purchased and the index fund continues with little to no input.
Index funds vs mutual funds
Investors looking to build a portfolio have two popular fund options: index funds and mutual funds. Both types of funds are created by offering diversification through a curated range of stocks and bonds and access to professionally managed investments, but there are some key differences between index funds and mutual funds that investors should be aware of before making their choice.
Index funds typically carry lower fees than mutual funds, but they also come with fewer features and tend to be more passive in nature.
Actively managed mutual funds on the other hand provide more flexibility when it comes to customization, as well as access to professionally-managed portfolios which may yield higher returns over time. Understanding how both index and mutual funds work will help investors make an informed decision about which type is right for them.
Is it worth investing in index funds?
Financial professionals will typically agree that index funds are a great way for investors to invest passively in the stock market. Not only do they require little input, but they also offer a low-cost option with a strongly diversified portfolio. Index funds also offer a good investment option for long-term investors.
However, it's important to remember that all investments come with risks, and individual financial situations can vary widely. Before making any investment decisions, it is highly recommended to consult a professional financial advisor who can assess your specific circumstances and provide tailored advice. Their expertise will help you make informed choices aligned with your financial goals and risk tolerance.

As we explore concepts within the investing world and the various available options, today we are looking into mutual funds to gain a proper understanding of what they are, how these are categorized, and what these actively managed funds could contribute to your investment journey.
What is a mutual fund?
A mutual fund is a type of investment vehicle that pools the money of many investors and invests it in stocks, bonds, or other securities. Mutual funds offer investors diversification, professional management, and economies of scale.
These actively managed funds also provide liquidity since they can be easily bought and sold through a broker or financial advisor. Mutual funds come with various levels of risk depending on their asset allocation strategy, with some being more conservative than others. Investing in mutual funds is a great way for individuals to access the stock market without having to purchase individual stocks themselves.
How can you access actively managed funds?
Investing in mutual funds is an easy and cost-effective way to diversify your portfolio, as they offer access to a wide range of asset classes. Mutual funds are professionally actively managed funds handled by fund managers who make decisions on behalf of the investors.
Accessing mutual funds is relatively straightforward, investors can buy mutual fund shares directly through a fund house or use the services of a financial advisor or online broker. The price will reflect the mutual fund shares' net asset value plus fees associated with the trade.
When one wants to redeem their shares, they will be worth the net asset value at the time plus any fees. The net asset value (NAV) of a mutual fund, more commonly referred to as its price, is determined by the total worth of all the securities held in the portfolio and divided by the number of outstanding shares.
Before investing in any mutual fund shares it’s important to understand the fees associated with them, such as management fees and sales charges, so that you can choose the best option for your needs. Mutual fund investing can be lucrative, but there are still risks associated.
The different types of mutual funds available
As with most investment options, there is never just one type. When it comes to mutual funds, there are roughly six different types that one can explore. Any interested mutual fund investor should become familiar with the following types:
1. Stock Funds
Also known as equity funds, stock funds are made up of stocks (publicly traded shares of a company). Stock funds allow mutual fund investors to invest in multiple publically traded companies, and effectively own a tiny piece of each. These stock funds are known to deliver the highest returns when compared to other mutual funds and have the greatest growth potential, however, they are also considered to be the most volatile.
Growth stock mutual funds, in particular, are known to grow at a faster rate than the rest of the markets. These are categorized by the companies' value, with small-cap funds incorporating companies valued below $2 billion, medium-cap funds $2-10 billion, and large-cap funds looking at companies valued at $10 million or higher.
These mutual funds can be further broken down into a number of categories, and offer a perfect means to diversify within the stock funds category:
Growth and Income Funds (Large Cap)
Aiming for slow and steady development, these calm-growth stock mutual funds invest in large-cap companies that have relatively modest rises and falls when compared to their smaller counterparts. As a result, mutual fund investors can be sure of long-term gains with minimal risk.
Growth Funds (Medium Cap)
A perfect medium between small-cap and large-cap funds, these mutual funds invest in mid-sized companies for moderate growth and volatility.
Emerging Market Funds (Small Cap)
These are the most volatile funds as they have the capability to offer massive profits or losses in a brief period. Investing heavily in up-and-coming startups with the potential for exponential growth is an integral part of these aggressive mutual funds.
International Funds
International growth stock mutual funds allow one to diversify their money even further and are composed of a variety of companies from across the world and differentiated by capital size. These mutual funds typically include the likes of international brands and market giants beyond the borders of a specific country.
2. Bond Funds
With bond funds, you have the option of investing in government or corporate bonds. Here, instead of buying a company's stock, your money is lent to governments and in return one earns interest. Unlike growth stock mutual funds which can be volatile and unstable in nature, bond funds offer steady returns and are known to provide consistent profits over time.
While bond funds err on the side of caution, it's important to remember that in order for an investment to be worthwhile it needs to grow at a faster rate than inflation. History shows that these types of mutual funds earn between 5-6% per annum, which should be evaluated against the inflation rates (typically 3-4%). While bond funds are a safe bet, one must consider whether they will generate wealth.
3. Index Funds
Index funds are a kind of mutual fund that seeks to match the performance of an index or certain segment of the market. Unlike most mutual funds which have their investments actively managed by professionals, index funds only buy the investments included in a specific index, a process known as passive management.
For example, the renowned S&P 500 index tracks the stock prices of some of America's leading businesses to measure their financial performance. Investing in an index fund of this nature allows you to invest in multiple companies at the same time.
While many investors believe index funds are more beneficial in the long run due to their lack of management fees, there is a plethora of professionally managed mutual funds that routinely surpass these. Not only this but investors who invest in mutual funds will always benefit from an experienced investment professional monitoring one's portfolio, making up for any additional costs with increased profits.
4. Income Funds
Those seeking regular income from their investments should consider mutual funds that focus on stocks paying dividends. Investors who opt for such a fund are not worried about the volatility of stock prices, instead, they're prioritizing receiving reliable small amounts of money from companies inside these mutual funds throughout the year.
5. Money Market Funds
Money market mutual funds provide investors with the opportunity to earn returns from loaning money out for short-term periods. Money market funds are typically loaned out to governments, banks, and companies that have contractual agreements in place to pay back investors within a year or less.
In comparison to bond funds, money market funds often fall short in terms of building wealth. For example, they typically pay an average return rate that is no higher than 3%, meaning your capital can actually decrease with time if inflation exceeds this level.
Money market mutual funds can act as a protective guard over one's cash. While it safeguards against any potential losses, its conservative nature also limits the chances of any significant growth.
6. Hybrid Mutual Funds
To ensure your investments are well-rounded and secure, hybrid mutual funds cleverly spread out the money across stocks (equity) and bonds (debt). Two common types of these intelligent funds include balanced funds and target-date funds. Investing with hybrid mutual funds offers returns in smaller time frames.
Balanced Hybrid Mutual Funds
Balanced hybrid mutual funds are investment funds that provide a combination of stocks and bonds, allowing investors to benefit from both the potentially higher returns of equities while also mitigating some of the risks with fixed-income investments.
These mutual funds typically have an asset allocation mix between 60% stocks and 40% bonds, but this can vary depending on the fund's objectives. Balanced hybrid mutual funds offer diversification within one single fund, making them ideal for those seeking to minimize their overall portfolio risk.
Similar to most mutual funds, these types of mutual funds are actively managed by experienced professionals who continually monitor market conditions in order to make adjustments when necessary.
Target-Date Hybrid Mutual Funds
Target-date hybrid mutual funds are a type of investment fund that combines both stocks and bonds to provide investors with the potential for higher returns while mitigating some of the risk associated with equities.
These mutual funds typically have an asset allocation mix that is based on when one plans to retire, allowing investors to benefit from diversification within one single fund. Target date funds can also be referred to as lifecycle funds.
Why invest in mutual funds?
Investing in mutual funds is a great way to diversify your portfolio and maximize your returns. Mutual funds are pools of money from several investors that can be used to purchase stocks, bonds, or other investments.
Most mutual funds allow investors to spread out the risk associated with investing across multiple assets instead of just one, reducing the volatility of your overall portfolio. Additionally, mutual fund managers have access to greater research capabilities than individual investors do which can help them identify profitable investments more quickly.
Overall, investing in mutual funds is an excellent way for individuals to benefit from professional management while also reducing their own risk exposure. Mutual funds are also recommended for long-term investment goals, particularly for retirement.
Crypto wallets are a critical tool for anyone looking to use, store, and manage crypto assets. Crypto wallets come in various forms, with different features and security options that cater to the needs of different users. Finding the right crypto wallet is essential if you want to get the most out of your cryptocurrency investments.
No matter what type of crypto wallet you choose, it’s important to do your research before making a decision since each one comes with its own set of advantages and disadvantages. It’s also important that you keep your private keys safe so no one else can access them, this will ensure that only you have control over your funds and crypto assets.
What is a crypto wallet?
A crypto wallet is a digital wallet that stores manages and facilitates the use of various cryptocurrencies. In order to store and use crypto assets, one needs a digital wallet. Unlike traditional wallets that simply hold your cash or cards, crypto wallets facilitate transactions as well as store your funds.
Each crypto wallet has a public and private key which are unique alphanumeric codes that grant the user access to the funds. Public keys are wallet addresses to which other users can send you cryptocurrencies, similar to your bank account number, while private keys are akin to a pin number and should not be shared with anyone.
In essence, crypto wallets act as secure interfaces for users to access, store and transfer funds across different blockchain networks. In essence, it’s like a bank account for digital currencies.
The different types of crypto wallets
Crypto wallets can be divided into two main categories: hot wallets and cold wallets.
Internet connectivity is the defining factor between hot wallets and cold wallets. Hot wallets are connected to the internet, making them less secure but much more user-friendly. On the other hand, cold wallets are stored completely offline and do not require any internet connection. This provides a higher level of security, which makes them ideal for individuals who plan on storing their crypto assets long-term.
Each of these categories can be further broken down into varying wallets. Under the hot wallets umbrella, there are desktop wallets, mobile wallets, and web wallets, while under the cold wallets umbrella, there are hardware and paper wallets.
Hot wallets
As a hot wallet is easy to set up and constantly connected to the internet they are ideal for users looking to make daily or frequent transactions. Typically with hot wallets, funds are quickly accessible and they tend to be very straightforward to operate. Below we look at the three main types of hot wallets: desktop wallets, mobile wallets, and web wallets.
Desktop wallet
A desktop wallet is a cryptocurrency storage solution that allows users to store, send, and receive crypto assets from their personal computers with the crypto wallet stored on the device’s hard drive.
It is generally considered to be a secure way of managing crypto assets as it does not require the user to store their funds on an exchange, instead giving control over the private keys associated with the hot wallet to the user.
The downside however is that it may be vulnerable to computer viruses should someone gain access to your desktop.
Mobile wallet
Mobile wallets are digital crypto wallets that allow users to manage their cryptocurrencies directly on their mobile devices. These crypto wallets are very convenient and secure compared to carrying large amounts of money around or keeping it in a traditional bank account.
Mobile wallets provide users instant access with more control over their funds and are particularly useful for quick payments that require a scan of a QR code. When downloading this type of hot wallet ensure that you use a link from the website directly to ensure that you are not falling for a fake wallet. This goes for all hot wallets and cold wallets listed here.
Mobile wallets are typically the best crypto wallets for users actively spending their crypto assets.
Web wallet
Web wallets are hosted by third-party services, which act as custodians for users' private keys. Web wallets provide an easy way to manage digital currencies, allowing users to quickly send and receive payments without having to download or install any software.
Additionally, web wallets offer enhanced security features such as two-factor authentication and multi-signature transactions. With these features in place, web wallets can provide a secure environment for storing cryptocurrencies regardless of the user's level of technical expertise, an added bonus for hot wallets.
Cold wallets
Cold wallets are hack resistant and therefore are considered the best crypto wallets for hodlers. In order to facilitate trades, cold wallets need to connect to the internet in order to trade directly from their cold storage devices.
Hardware wallet
Hardware wallets store private keys on a physical device like a USB drive or an external hard drive. A common example of this is the Ledger Nano X, while secure it retails for roughly $150.
These crypto wallets provide maximum security but require more effort to set up and use compared to other types of crypto wallets. They typically are also more expensive as one needs to buy a physical device.
Paper wallet
Finally, paper wallets are simply printed copies of public/private key pairs which allow you to securely store funds offline without having any digital device at all. While these are considered to be the best crypto wallets in terms of security, if the paper gets damaged then the funds are lost.
Finding the right crypto wallet for you
In order to find the right crypto wallet you will need to establish what specifically you wish to do with your funds. If you are looking to hold them long-term, cold wallets are by far the more secure solution, however, if you are making payments and using cryptocurrencies in your day-to-day life, a hot wallet or even a mobile wallet might be better suited to your needs.
Many crypto users utilize a combination of two or three, using the more secure crypto wallet option to hold their funds long-term while also having a portion of funds in a preferred hot wallet allowing them quick and easy access to their funds when they need them.

Ethereum Naming Service is a branch from the original blockchain network which aims to make the crypto space, particularly within the DeFi and Web3 sectors, more user-friendly and accessible. Similar to how Domain Name Service made the internet more accessible, Ethereum Name Service aims to do the same and become a fundamental component of these sectors.
What is Ethereum Name Service (ENS)?
Ethereum Name Service (ENS) is a decentralized naming system that simplifies sending and receiving payments in the Ethereum network. It works like a domain name service (DNS) uses IP addresses, but instead for Ethereum crypto addresses, allowing users to register human-readable names that are mapped to their Ethereum addresses. This makes it easier to remember and share addresses, instead of having to remember long strings of characters.
For example, a user could register the domain name "myname.eth" and associate it with their Ethereum wallet address. Once registered, anyone can send payments to "myname.eth" instead of the complicated Ethereum address.
Users can register a name through various ENS domain registrars or directly through the ENS manager. Once registered, the name is added to the Ethereum Name Service Registry, and the user becomes the owner of that name. ENS uses a hierarchical system of domains similar to the DNS system used for the internet.
Once registered, the user can then set the resolver, which is a smart contract that provides information about the Ethereum wallet address associated with the ENS name.
The resolver can be thought of as a mapping function between the name and the Ethereum wallet address. When someone sends a payment to an ENS name, the resolver is queried to retrieve the associated Ethereum address. Once the Ethereum wallet address is retrieved, the payment can be sent directly to the address.
ENS also allows users to add additional data to their domain names, such as an IPFS hash or a swarm hash, making it possible to associate decentralized content with a domain name. For example, a user could associate an IPFS hash with their domain name, making it possible to access decentralized content using a human-readable name.
Who created Ethereum Name Service?
Ethereum Name Service (ENS) was initially part of the Ethereum Foundation and proposed by Nick Johnson in 2016 as a way to simplify the process of sending and receiving payments in the Ethereum network. Nick Johnson is a software engineer that previously worked at Google and the Ethereum Foundation.
The ENS system was launched as a separate entity in May 2017 as a decentralized naming service on the Ethereum blockchain. Since its launch, ENS has been widely adopted by the Ethereum community and has become an essential part of the Ethereum ecosystem.
How does Ethereum Name Service work?
The Ethereum Name Service (ENS) system is similar to the DNS (Domain Name System) used on the internet. Users can register an ENS domain name under the .eth top-level domain and associate them with their Ethereum addresses by using the platform's smart contracts.
This means that instead of sending payments to complicated and hard-to-remember Ethereum crypto addresses, users can simply send payments to easy-to-remember domain names. For example, instead of sending funds to 0x71C7656EC7ab88b098defB751B7401B5f6d89, users can instead send funds to tap.eth.
The system uses two smart contracts to make this possible: the registry and the resolver.
ENS Registry
To use ENS, users must first register a name through a registrar. Registrars are entities that facilitate the registration of domain names under the .eth top-level domain and store all the domains. Once a user has registered a name, it is added to the ENS Registry, and the user becomes the owner of that name.
ENS Resolver
The next step is to set the resolver, which is a smart contract that provides information about the Ethereum address associated with the ENS domain. Resolvers can be set by the user or they can use one of the default resolvers provided by ENS. Once the resolver is set, users can associate their Ethereum crypto address with their ENS name. This is done by adding a record to the resolver that maps the ENS name to the wallet address.
ENS allows users to add additional data to their ENS domains, such as an IPFS hash or a swarm hash. ENS also supports subdomains, which are domains that are associated with a parent domain name. This makes it possible to create a hierarchical naming system that is similar to the DNS system used on the internet.
What is the ENS token?
The Ethereum Name Service (ENS) did not have its own token until recently. In 2021, the ENS team announced the launch of a new governance token called ENS, which is separate from the old ERC-20 token with the same name.
The new ENS token is used for governance and voting purposes and is not used to pay for the registration or renewal of ENS domain names. Instead, users need to pay in ETH to register their “.eth” domains, with an idea of the costs reflected below (subject to change due to market fluctuations, please review the ENS website for accurate costs):
$5 in ETH per year, for a five+ character .eth ENS domain;
$160 in ETH per year, for a four-character .eth ENS domain;
$640 in ETH per year, for a three-character .eth ENS domain.
The higher prices are due to the supply of three- and four-character .eth names being smaller.
The total supply of the new ENS token is 100 million, and they were distributed through a community airdrop in 2021.
What is the ENS DAO?
The ENS DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization) is a community-governed organization that oversees the development and management of the Ethereum Name Service (ENS) ecosystem. It is responsible for making decisions about the future direction of the ENS system, including upgrades, changes to policies, and new feature development. The organisation is governed by the ENS token holders, who have the right to vote on proposals and decisions related to the ENS ecosystem.
The organization is an important part of the ENS ecosystem, as it ensures that the system is developed and managed in a decentralized and community-driven manner. It allows stakeholders to have a voice in the decision-making process and ensures that the system remains responsive to the needs of the community.
What is the ENS Foundation?
The Ethereum Name Service (ENS) Foundation is a non-profit organization that supports the development and growth of the ENS ecosystem. It oversees the development of the ENS system, promotes its adoption, and provides support to users and developers.
The ENS Foundation is involved in a wide range of activities related to the ENS ecosystem, including organizing community events, providing guidance, and funding the ongoing development of the ENS system. It plays a critical role in supporting the growth and development of the ecosystem alongside the ENS DAO, which is responsible for making decisions about the future direction of the ENS system.
How can I buy ENS tokens?
Tap's mobile app enables users to easily acquire, trade and securely store Ethereum Name Service (ENS) in an integrated wallet. Users can buy and sell the ENS token using a variety of supported crypto or fiat currencies. The app also provides a reliable space to store ENS tokens and other digital assets. By downloading the Tap mobile app, users can unlock the potential of a range of cryptocurrencies and fiat wallets.
Generational wealth is not just about building a large stash of money, it's also about how you pass it on. Once you've paid off your debts and established various forms of income, the next step is to start to build generational wealth that can surpass your lifetime.
In this article, we explore what generational wealth is and how to start building it. As with any investment account, the earlier you start the better the end result. While building generational wealth is a great place to be, we encourage you to get your current financial situation in order and build your financial education before you start exploring this concept.
What is generational wealth?
Generational wealth, also called family wealth, is the transfer of assets from one generation to the next within a family. This may include multiple streams of income from financial investments like stocks and bonds, as well as valuable assets, real estate, and family businesses. These assets continue to generate financial value as opposed to just being a lump sum of cash.
It's important to note that when an individual is born into wealth, that wealth was created by a generation before them, whether that be decades or centuries before. This financial success can help eliminate financial struggles for generations to come, or if not handled correctly, could be eradicated by just one generation.
The key factor when it comes to passing on generational wealth
Creating wealth is not the hardest part, the hardest part is educating the next generations on how to manage this wealth. According to the Williams Group wealth consultancy, 70% of wealthy families lose their wealth by the second generation while a whopping 90% lose it by the third.
Generational wealth is not about creating enough money to allow your children’s children to sit around all day, it’s about passing wealth down for generations to come to make the world a better place and empower the family tree. It's not about materialism or consumerism, it should be about financial education and philanthropy. Consider how important generational wealth is to you before embarking on building wealth for future generations.
The key steps to building generational wealth
There are two key components that need to come together in order to build generational wealth: firstly, building this wealth, and secondly, passing on this wealth. In this first section, we will cover the former.
Creating generational wealth isn't going to happen overnight. It's a journey that necessitates time, purposeful planning, and commitment. There are no shortcuts when it comes to creating generational wealth, it's a marathon, not a sprint, no matter which financial assets or stock market you might choose to invest in.
It involves not only taking care of your personal finances through proper planning but also educating the next generation about financial literacy and personal finance. This legacy wealth could go on to fund a child's education or college education, or be used to build an impressive real estate portfolio or invest in family businesses.
It's not about inheriting a trust fund at a young age so that one can simply enjoy life, it's about learning how to be financially fit, understanding how to create wealth, and hopefully building a secure financial future for the next generation.
1. Build a solid financial foundation
First and foremost, you will need to build a solid financial foundation before you start to build generational wealth which means you need to get out of debt and establish an emergency fund (three to six months' worth of expenses).
Do not progress to step two until this step has been completed. In order to build wealth one needs a firm foundation, so set yourself up to weather any storms that might come your way before you embark on the journey to create generational wealth.
2. Start allocating 15% of your income to a retirement fund
Now that you are out of debt and have established an emergency fund, allocate at least 15% to your retirement fund. In this step, consistency is key. Determine what kind of investment account (whether using new-age financial assets or the stock market) you wish to use, consult a financial advisor if necessary, and start allocating 15% of your gross income to this tax-advantaged retirement account.
If you consistently do this for two to three decades you will have built enough wealth to live comfortably after retirement and pass some on.
3. Build slowly and consistently
As we mentioned earlier, building generational wealth is a marathon, not a sprint. This is a long-term commitment that requires no rush and no pressure. Commit to consistently building your wealth for the rest of your life.
4. Communicate with your family and educate them about money
Discuss your financial goals with your children and use the opportunity to share your knowledge about wealth. If your wealth creation involves investing in real estate, building a family business, or any avenue that requires active participation, ensure that you keep your descendants in the loop and provide them with the wisdom, knowledge, and skills to maintain and ideally continue to build generational wealth.
By discussing money frequently, being open about mistakes you have made with finances, and demonstrating smart financial decisions in your own life, you can teach your children about the importance of managing their money wisely.
5. Officiate things by making them legal
When it comes to building generational wealth, a financial advisor is optional but including a lawyer is essential. This step ensures that the generational wealth you spent your lifetime building is distributed accordingly.
Ensure that you go through the necessary legal proceedings to make sure you're not only on the right side of the law but also that the generational wealth is passed on as per your intentions.
How to pass on generational wealth
Now that you've put the processes in place to start to build generational wealth, the next step is to put in place the necessary steps to ensure a smooth handoff. Here are three key steps to ensure that your generational wealth remains a blessing and not a chaotic curse for those left behind.
1. Create a will
No matter what earthly possessions or family wealth one has, a will is essential for everyone 18 years and older. This legal document outlines how your assets are distributed after you die. While consulting legal counsel is advised, there are plenty of templates and methods online for writing and establishing your will. Regardless of whether you create generational wealth or not, this step is important.
2. Establish an estate plan
Estate planning entails organizing your possessions and determining how they should be handled after you have departed. A will is a very important component, but if your net worth exceeds $1 million, consulting a professional could be wise to guarantee that all the details of your estate plan are in order.
Expert estate planners can help with more complex situations, like a family business or intricate family wealth, as well as demonstrate tactics for diminishing federal taxes so you don't pay any more than necessary.
3. Put together a legacy drawer outlining your family wealth
Crafting your legacy drawer should be on everyone's to-do list, it is a place where you store important documentation and items that will become invaluable for your family (and family wealth) should anything happen. While there are many documents to consider keeping in this secure location, here are a few must-haves:
- Your will and estate plan
- Financial account information
- A copy of your monthly budget
- Life insurance policy
- Tax returns
- Account passwords
- Personal letters to loved ones
- Funeral instructions
Create lasting generational wealth
If you want to create lasting generational wealth and blessings for generations to come, it's time to put your head down and get started. Consider this a long-term journey that with the right investments and education will empower generations to come.
PAX Gold is the hybrid investment option bridging the gap between digital currencies and the gold market. This cryptocurrency provides the benefits of blockchain technology without the price volatility. The Pax Gold token also offers a more accessible way for traders to invest in physical gold assets.
What is PAX Gold?
PAX Gold (PAXG) is the biggest digital asset backed by underlying gold and each PAXG token represents one fine troy ounce of a 400-ounce London Good Delivery gold bar. The price of PAX Gold mimics the current gold market prices of gold, making it a more stable crypto investment with less volatility.
The crypto asset is issued by the Paxos Trust Company and the market value of the circulating supply is held in physical gold bars in vaults similar to how stablecoins hold reserves of the fiat currency they are pegged to.
To guarantee its integrity, the Paxos Trust Company undergoes and releases monthly audits to verify that its PAXG tokens are equal to the amount of allocated gold it holds. This process is regulated by the New York State Department of Financial Services.
Additionally, users have the option to redeem their PAXG tokens for allocated gold bullion bars whenever they desire, or for smaller amounts of unallocated gold bullion bars through a network of physical gold retailers around the world.
PAXG tokens are based on the ERC-20 token standard and provide users with all of the benefits of owning physical gold bars without the drawbacks typically associated with the physical commodities. These include limited accessibility, challenges storing the physical gold, difficulties transporting it, etc.
Due to its tokenized nature, PAXG can be traded for other cryptocurrencies in the sector, or simply redeemed for physical gold.
Who created the PAX Gold platform?
The Paxos Trust Company was co-founded by Charles Cascarilla and Rich Teo in 2012 with the aim to provide a more accessible and trustworthy means of moving assets. Cascarilla holds a degree in finance with experience in the capital management sector. He has also participated in multiple traditional and blockchain-based venture capital projects.
In 2018, the company released Paxos Standard (PAX), a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, with reserves held in US bank accounts. In 2021, PAX rebranded to the Pax Dollar (USDP). The stablecoin remains one of the top 10 biggest asset-backed cryptocurrencies.
In 2019, PAX Gold (PAXG) was launched. The allocated gold-backed digital asset holds its reserves in vaults secured by Brinks. The company undergoes monthly audits which verify that the correct amount of reserves is held for each coin.
The company has achieved strong institutional support and secured more than $500 million in funding from reputable investors such as OakHC/FT, PayPal Ventures and Mithril Partners.
How does the PAX Gold work?
First and foremost, PAXG represents physical gold. PAX Gold (PAXG) is an ERC-20 token built on the Ethereum blockchain making it compatible with many dapps and decentralized exchanges within the DeFi space. When creating or destroying PAXG tokens, the company charges a small fee (0.02%) while the trader is liable for gas fees for any on-chain transactions.
Increasing investment entry barriers, the token is divisible by 18 decimal places, allowing anyone access to fractional ownership of a physical gold bar without the associated burdens of owning physical gold (transport, storage, etc).
Each PAXG token is allocated a unique serial number that matches that of an individual gold bar held in reserve. Holders are entitled to find the physical gold bar, its value, and other characteristics by using the PAXG lookup tool. Tokens can also be redeemed for gold, fiat currency, or other digital currencies as per the current market price of gold at that time.
PAXG transactions are closely monitored and surveyed by Paxos using third-party analytical tools for the purpose of investigating any potential cases of fraud or money laundering. In addition, developers subject the code to regular smart contract audits in order to detect bugs and vulnerabilities.
What is the PAXG token
PAX Gold (PAXG) is an ERC-20 token built on the Ethereum blockchain. Each PAXG token represents one fine troy ounce of a 400-ounce London Good Delivery gold bar which can be traced using the unique serial number.
The cryptocurrency offers investors exposure to the price of gold as well as investment opportunities otherwise difficult to access. The advantage of investing in cryptocurrencies like Pax Gold PAXG is that one can bypass the physical challenges of investing in real gold reserves. Instead, one can manage their investments from the convenience of their home.
The Paxos Trust Company holds all PAXG token reserves in vaults and undergoes monthly audits which are published on the Paxos Trust Company’s website.
How can I buy the PAX Gold token?
If you're looking to invest in the long-term value of high-quality gold without concerning yourself with physical gold bars, with the added benefits of blockchain technology Gold PAXG tokens might be the answer you're looking for.
Tap provides a seamless entryway to buying, storing and selling Pax Gold PAXG tokens. Users will simply need to download the Tap app, create an account and complete the quick verification process. From there they will gain access to a number of secure integrated crypto wallets and vetted cryptocurrency markets, including PAX Gold tokens.
The app not only allows users to buy, sell, trade and store cryptocurrencies, but also provides a payment service that allows users to make fiat payments directly from the app. Whether through an electronic payment or the Tap card, users can spend their crypto and fiat currencies anywhere, anytime.
Kickstart your financial journey
Ready to take the first step? Join forward-thinking traders and savvy money users. Unlock new possibilities and start your path to success today.
Get started