Learn how to call UK numbers from abroad using the +44 country code. Get dialling formats, area codes, mobile tips & common mistakes to avoid.
Keep reading
Need to call someone in the United Kingdom from abroad? You'll need to use the 44 country code to connect successfully. Whether you're reaching friends, family, or business contacts in England, Scotland, Wales, or Northern Ireland, understanding how to properly dial UK numbers is essential for international communication.
What is the 44 country code?
The 44 country code is the international dialling code assigned to the UK by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). When you're calling from any other country, you must prefix the local UK number with 44 to route your call through the international telephone network.
Here's what you need to know about country code 44:
- Covers the entire UK: England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland
- Must replace the leading zero: UK numbers start with 0 domestically, but you drop this when using 44
- Works for all UK numbers: landlines, mobiles, and business lines
- Required for international calls: You cannot reach UK numbers from abroad without using 44
The key rule to remember is that when you use country code 44, you must omit the leading '0' that appears in all UK phone numbers when dialled domestically. For example, a London number that appears as 020 7946 0958 within the UK becomes +44 20 7946 0958 when called internationally.
How to call the UK from abroad
The standard format for calling UK numbers internationally follows this pattern:
[International Exit Code] + [44] + [Area Code without 0] + [Local Number]
Your international exit code depends on which country you're calling from:
From the United States or Canada:
- Dial: 011 + 44 + UK number (without the leading 0)
- Example: To call London number 020 7946 0958, dial 011 44 20 7946 0958
From European Union countries:
- Dial: 00 + 44 + UK number (without the leading 0)
- Example: From Germany to the same London number, dial 00 44 20 7946 0958
From India:
- Dial: 00 + 44 + UK number (without the leading 0)
- Example: 00 44 20 7946 0958
From Australia:
- Dial: 0011 + 44 + UK number (without the leading 0)
- Example: 0011 44 20 7946 0958
Hot tip: Most modern smartphones allow you to use the '+' symbol instead of your country's exit code. Simply dial +44 followed by the UK number without the leading zero.
UK area codes you need to know (landlines)
Understanding UK area codes for landline numbers helps you identify which region you're calling and ensures you dial correctly. Here are the major UK area codes you'll encounter:
City/Region | Area Code | Example International Format |
---|---|---|
London | 20 | +44 20 XXXX XXXX |
Birmingham | 121 | +44 121 XXX XXXX |
Manchester | 161 | +44 161 XXX XXXX |
Glasgow | 141 | +44 141 XXX XXXX |
Edinburgh | 131 | +44 131 XXX XXXX |
Liverpool | 151 | +44 151 XXX XXXX |
Cardiff | 29 | +44 29 XXXX XXXX |
Belfast | 28 | +44 28 XXXX XXXX |
Bristol | 117 | +44 117 XXX XXXX |
Leeds | 113 | +44 113 XXX XXXX |
Remember that these area codes appear after the 44 country code and never include the initial 0 that you see in domestic UK dialling.
Common mistakes when dialling UK numbers
Avoid these frequent mistakes that prevent successful connections to UK numbers:
Including the leading zero: The most common mistake is dialling +44 0 followed by the rest of the number. This creates an invalid number format that won't connect.
Using incorrect exit codes: Each country has its own international exit code. Using 00 when calling from the US (which requires 011) will result in call failure.
Incomplete area codes: Some callers truncate area codes, especially longer ones like Birmingham's 121. Always include the complete area code after 44.
Network restrictions: Your mobile carrier or VoIP service might block international calls by default. Check with your provider if calls aren't connecting despite correct dialling.
Time zone confusion: Calling during UK nighttime hours may result in unanswered calls, even if your dialling format is correct.
How to call UK mobile numbers using 44
UK mobile numbers follow a specific format that's important to understand for international calling. All UK mobile numbers begin with 07 when dialled domestically, which becomes 447 in international format.
UK Mobile Number Structure:
- Domestic format: 07XXX XXXXXX
- International format: +44 7XXX XXXXXX
Examples of calling UK mobile numbers:
- From US: 011 44 7700 900123
- From EU: 00 44 7700 900123
- Using + symbol: +44 7700 900123
When saving UK mobile numbers in your phone's contacts, use the international format (+44 7XXX XXXXXX) so the number works whether you're calling domestically within the UK or internationally from abroad.
Free ways to call the UK
Before paying for expensive international calls, consider these free alternatives:
Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Apps:
- WhatsApp: Free voice and video calls over WiFi or data
- FaceTime: Free for iPhone/iPad/Mac users
- Google Meet: Free video calls with phone dial-in options
- Viber: Free calls between Viber users
When VoIP works best:
- Both parties have stable internet connections
- Calling friends or family who use smartphones
- Non-urgent conversations where call quality fluctuations are acceptable
When traditional calling is better:
- Emergency situations requiring immediate connection
- Business calls where professional quality is essential
- Calling landlines or people without smartphones
- Areas with poor internet connectivity
Emergency numbers and special codes in the UK
Understanding UK number types helps you dial correctly and know what to expect:
Emergency Numbers:
- 999: Primary emergency number (police, fire, ambulance)
- 112: European emergency number (works in UK)
- 101: Non-emergency police contact
When calling emergency numbers from abroad, you still need to use +44, but these calls receive priority routing. However, for true emergencies while visiting the UK, calling locally using 999 or 112 is faster than international routing.
Best time to call the UK from other countries
Timing your calls appropriately ensures better connection rates and recipient availability:
UK Time Zone: Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) in winter, British Summer Time (BST/GMT+1) in summer
Business Hours: Generally 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday
Optimal Calling Windows by Region:
From US East Coast:
- UK morning (9 AM-12 PM) = US early morning (4 AM-7 AM)
- UK afternoon (1 PM-5 PM) = US morning (8 AM-12 PM)
From US West Coast:
- UK morning = US very early morning (1 AM-4 AM)
- UK afternoon = US early morning (5 AM-9 AM)
From India:
- UK morning = India afternoon (2:30 PM-5:30 PM)
- UK evening = India late evening (9:30 PM-12:30 AM)
From Australia (Sydney):
- UK morning = Australia evening (8 PM-11 PM)
- UK evening = Australia early morning (2 AM-5 AM)
Lastly
Understanding the 44 country code system ensures your international calls to the UK connect successfully every time. Whether you're calling London business contacts, relatives in Edinburgh, or friends in Cardiff, following these guidelines will help you communicate effectively across international boundaries.
NEWS AND UPDATES

What's driving the crypto market this week? Get fast, clear updates on the top coins, market trends, and regulation news.
Welcome to Tap’s weekly crypto market recap.
Here are the biggest stories from last week (8 - 14 July).
💥 Bitcoin breaks new ATH
Bitcoin officially hit above $122,000 marking its first record since May and pushing total 2025 gains to around +20% YTD. The rally was driven by heavy inflows into U.S. spot ETFs, over $218m into BTC and $211m into ETH in a single day, while nearly all top 100 coins turned green.
📌 Trump Media files for “Crypto Blue‑Chip ETF”
Trump Media & Technology Group has submitted an S‑1 to the SEC for a new “Crypto Blue Chip ETF” focused primarily on BTC (70%), ETH (15%), SOL (8%), XRP (5%), and CRO (2%), marking its third crypto ETF push this year.
A major political/media player launching a multi-asset crypto fund signals growing mainstream and institutional acceptance, and sparks fresh conflict-of-interest questions. We’ll keep you updated.
🌍 Pakistan launches CBDC pilot & virtual‑asset regulation
The State Bank of Pakistan has initiated a pilot for a central bank digital currency and is finalising virtual-asset laws, with Binance CEO CZ advising government efforts. With inflation at just 3.2% and rising foreign reserves (~$14.5b), Pakistan is embracing fintech ahead of emerging-market peers like India.
🛫 Emirates Airline to accept crypto payments
Dubai’s Emirates signed a preliminary partnership with Crypto.com to enable crypto payments starting in 2026, deepening the Gulf’s commitment to crypto-friendly infrastructure.
*Not to take away from the adoption excitement, but you can book Emirates flights with your Tap card, using whichever crypto you like.
🏛️ U.S. declares next week “Crypto Week”
House Republicans have designated 14-18 July as “Crypto Week,” aiming for votes on GENIUS (stablecoin oversight), CLARITY (jurisdiction clarity), and Anti‑CBDC bills. The idea is that these bills could reshape how U.S. defines crypto regulation and limit federal CBDC initiatives under Trump-aligned priorities.
Stay tuned for next week’s instalment, delivered on Monday mornings.

Explore why Bitcoin and the crypto market are worth $2.1 trillion and why skepticism still lingers among Americans in this deep dive.
Decoding the disconnect: America's cautious approach to crypto
Bitcoin and the broader crypto market have soared to a staggering $2.1 trillion in value, but why does skepticism still linger among so many Americans?
Despite increasing adoption, digital currencies remain shrouded in doubt, revealing a significant trust gap that continues to challenge the industry. As cryptocurrencies become more woven into everyday financial transactions, closing this trust deficit is essential for ensuring sustained growth and mainstream acceptance.
In this article, we'll dive into the key reasons behind this persistent mistrust, uncover the expanding real-world uses of digital assets, and explore how education and technological advancements can help bridge the confidence gap. Keep in mind, the data presented draws from multiple studies, so some figures and age groupings may vary slightly.
A Look at the Current State of Crypto Trust
To truly understand cryptocurrency adoption and the accompanying trust issues, it’s essential to examine the latest statistics and demographic data. This section breaks down public sentiment toward crypto and provides a snapshot of its user base.
General Public Sentiment
Percentage of Americans Who Own Cryptocurrency
Cryptocurrency adoption has seen slow but steady growth over the years. According to surveys conducted by Pew Research Center in 2021 and 2023, 17% of Americans have invested in, traded, or used cryptocurrency, up slightly from 16% in 2021.
While estimates vary, Security.org places this figure higher, estimating that roughly 40% of the U.S. population - around 93 million adults - own some form of cryptocurrency.
Both studies agree that younger generations are driving much of this growth, with 30% of Americans aged 18-29 reporting they have experience with crypto.
Trust Levels in Cryptocurrency
Despite rising adoption rates, trust in cryptocurrency remains a significant hurdle. Pew Research Center found that 75% of Americans have little or no confidence that cryptocurrency exchanges can safeguard their funds. Similarly, a recent report by Morning Consult shows that 7 in 10 consumers familiar with crypto express low or no trust in it.
This contrasts the 31% who have some or high trust, or the 24% in the Pew study who are “somewhat” to “extremely” confident in cryptocurrencies.
Demographics of Crypto Adopters
- Age Groups
Cryptocurrency adoption trends reveal a distinct generational divide. According to the 2023 Morning Consult survey, Gen Z adults (ages 18-25) lead in crypto ownership at 36%, closely followed by Millennials at 30%.
These younger groups are also more inclined toward future investments, with 39% of Gen Z and 45% of Millennials planning to invest in crypto in the coming years. Over half of both generations view cryptocurrency and blockchain as the future, while a notable percentage (27% of Gen Z and 21% of Millennials) considered opening an account with a crypto exchange in the past year.
When compared to other asset classes, data from Bankrate’s 2021 survey reveals that younger Millennials (ages 25-31) favor real estate and stock market investments, while Baby Boomers have the least interest in cryptocurrency. Older Millennials (32-40) lean toward cash investments, with cryptocurrency’s appeal steadily declining with age.
Interestingly, the report also highlights gender differences, showing that 80% of women familiar with crypto express low confidence, compared to 71% of men, indicating a broader trust gap among female users.
- Income Levels
Contrary to common assumptions, cryptocurrency adoption is not confined to high-income individuals. The same Pew Research Center survey revealed that crypto ownership is relatively evenly spread across income brackets:
- 13% of those earning less than $56,600 annually own crypto.
- 19% of those earning between $56,600 and $169,800 own crypto.
- 22% of those earning over $169,800 own crypto.
This data suggests that while higher earners may be more inclined to own cryptocurrency, the appeal of digital assets spans various income levels.
- Educational Background
Education also plays a role in crypto adoption. A 2022 report by Triple-A found that the majority of crypto owners are “highly educated”:
- 24% of crypto owners have graduated from middle or high school.
- 10% have some vocational or college education.
- 39% are college graduates.
- 27% hold postgraduate degrees.
This shows that while those with some college education or a degree are more likely to own crypto, it is not exclusively a pursuit of the highly educated.
This demographic data paints a picture of cryptocurrency adopters as predominantly younger, spread across a range of income levels, and with diverse educational backgrounds. However, the trust gap between crypto and traditional financial systems remains a significant barrier to wider acceptance of digital assets.
Key Trust Barriers
To bridge the gap between cryptocurrency adoption and trust, it’s crucial to understand the major concerns fueling skepticism. This section explores these concerns and contrasts them with similar risks in traditional financial systems.
The Primary Concerns of Skeptics
Volatility
One of the most significant barriers to cryptocurrency adoption is its notorious volatility, particularly for investors seeking stable, long-term assets. Bitcoin, the most well-known cryptocurrency, symbolizes this risk.
In 2022, Bitcoin’s volatility was stark. Its 30-day volatility reached 64.02% in June, driven by broader economic uncertainty and market downturns, compared to the S&P 500’s much lower volatility of 4.71% during the same period.
Over the course of the year, Bitcoin’s price swung from a peak of $47,835 to a low of $18,490, marking a substantial 61% decline from its highest point in 2022. Factors such as rising interest rates, geopolitical tensions, and major crypto market disruptions, like the TerraUSD collapse and Celsius’ liquidity crisis, played a pivotal role.
This extreme volatility reinforces the perception of cryptocurrencies as high-risk investments.
However, traditional stock markets, while typically more stable than crypto, can also experience sharp fluctuations, especially in times of economic stress. For instance, the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX), which measures expected near-term volatility in the U.S. stock market, dropped by 23% to 28.71 on June 30, 2022, far below the 82.69 peak recorded during the early COVID-19 market turbulence in March 2020. This shows that even stock markets, generally seen as safer, can experience moments of intense volatility, particularly during global crises.
Additionally, when compared to the "Magnificent Seven" (a group of top-performing and influential stocks) Bitcoin’s volatility doesn't stand out as unusual. In fact, over the past two years, Bitcoin has shown less volatility than Netflix (NFLX) stock.
On a 90-day timeframe, NFLX had an average realized volatility of 53%, while Bitcoin’s was slightly lower at 46%. The reality is that among all S&P 500 companies, Bitcoin has demonstrated lower annualized historical volatility than 33 of the 503 constituents.
In October 2023, Bitcoin was actually less volatile than 92 stocks in the S&P 500, based on 90-day realized historical volatility figures, including some large-cap and mega-cap companies.
Security
Security concerns are another major hurdle in building trust with cryptocurrencies. Cryptocurrency exchanges and wallets have been targeted by numerous high-profile hacks and frauds, raising doubts about the safety of digital assets. It comes as no surprise that a study from Morning Consult found that 67% of Americans believe having a secure and trustworthy platform is essential to entering the crypto market.
While security threats in the crypto space are well-documented, traditional banking systems are not immune to fraud either. Federal Trade Commission data reveals that consumer fraud losses in the traditional financial sector hit a record high of $10 billion in 2023, marking a 14% increase from the previous year.
Although traditional banks have more safeguards in place to protect consumers, they remain vulnerable to attacks, showing that security is a universal challenge across both crypto and traditional finance.
Prevention remains key, which in this case equates to using only reliable platforms or hardwallets.
Regulatory Uncertainty
Regulatory ambiguity continues to be a critical barrier for both cryptocurrency investors and businesses. The evolving landscape creates uncertainty about the future of digital assets.
Currently, cryptocurrency is legal in 119 countries and four British Overseas Territories, covering more than half of the world’s nations. Notably, 64.7% of these countries are emerging and developing economies, primarily in Asia and Africa.
However, only 62 of these 119 countries (52.1%) have comprehensive regulations in place. This represents significant growth from 2018, when only 33 jurisdictions had formal regulations, showing a 53.2% increase, but still falls short in creating a sense of “unified safety”.
In the United States, regulatory views remain fragmented. Various agencies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), have conflicting perspectives on how to classify and regulate cryptocurrencies. Since 2019, the SEC has filed over 116 crypto-related lawsuits, adding to the regulatory uncertainty faced by the industry.
The Growing Integration Of Digital Assets In Daily Life
As we progress further into the digital age, cryptocurrencies and digital assets are increasingly becoming part of our everyday financial transactions. This shift is driven by two key developments: the rise of crypto payment options and the growing adoption of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs).
According to a MatrixPort report, global cryptocurrency adoption has now reached 7.51% of the population, underscoring the expanding influence of digital currencies worldwide. By 2025, this rate is expected to surpass 8%, signaling a potential shift from niche usage to mainstream acceptance.
The list of major retailers embracing cryptocurrency as a payment method continues to grow. Some notable companies now accepting crypto include:
- Microsoft: Accepts Bitcoin for Xbox store credits.
- AT&T: The first major U.S. mobile carrier to accept crypto payments.
- Whole Foods: Accepts Bitcoin via the Spedn app.
- Overstock: One of the first major retailers to accept Bitcoin.
- Starbucks: Allows customers to load their Starbucks cards with Bitcoin through the Bakkt app.
A 2022 Deloitte survey revealed that nearly 75% of retailers plan to accept either cryptocurrency or stablecoin payments within the next two years. This trend highlights the growing mainstream acceptance of digital assets as a legitimate payment method.
Crypto-backed debit cards are further bridging the gap between digital assets and everyday transactions. These cards enable users to spend their cryptocurrency at any merchant that accepts traditional debit cards.
According to Factual Market Research, the global crypto card market is projected to reach $9.5 billion by 2030, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 31.6% from 2021 to 2030. This growth reflects the increasing popularity of crypto-backed debit cards as a way for consumers to integrate their digital assets into daily spending.
The Rise of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs)
Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) represent digital versions of a country’s fiat currency, issued and regulated by the national monetary authority. In 2024, the global progress of CBDCs has seen a significant uptick, with marked advances in both research and adoption. As of this year:
- 11 countries have fully launched CBDCs, including the Bahamas, Nigeria, Jamaica, and China.
- 44 countries are conducting pilot programs, up from 36, reflecting growing interest in testing the functionality and stability of digital currencies.
- 66 nations are at advanced stages of CBDC development, contributing to a global landscape where 134 countries (accounting for 98% of the world’s economy) are engaged in CBDC projects.
In the United States, the Federal Reserve is exploring the feasibility of a CBDC through Project Hamilton, a collaborative research initiative with MIT. This exploration aligns with broader goals to reduce reliance on cash, enhance financial inclusion, and improve control over national monetary systems amid the rise of digital payments and cryptocurrencies.
The introduction of CBDCs could significantly reshape daily financial transactions in several ways:
- Increased financial inclusion: CBDCs could offer digital payment access to the 1.4 billion adults who remain unbanked, according to World Bank estimates.
- Faster and cheaper transactions: CBDCs could streamline both domestic and cross-border payments, reducing costs and settlement times.
- Enhanced monetary policy: Central banks would gain more direct control over money supply and circulation.
- Improved traceability: CBDCs could help combat financial crimes and reduce tax evasion by providing greater transaction transparency.
However, challenges persist, including concerns about privacy, cybersecurity risks, and the potential disruption of existing banking systems.
As digital assets continue to integrate into everyday life, they hold the potential to transform how we think about and use money. Despite these challenges, trends in both private cryptocurrency adoption and CBDC development point to a future where digital assets play a central role in our financial systems.
Building Trust Through Technology and Education
According to the 2023 Web3 UI/UX Report, nearly 48% of users cite security concerns and asset protection as the primary barriers to crypto adoption. Other challenges include high transaction fees and the steep learning curve needed to fully grasp both the technology and its benefits.
Despite these obstacles, the blockchain sector has made significant strides as it matures, particularly in enhancing security. Hack-related losses in the crypto market dropped from $3.7 billion in 2022 to $1.8 billion in 2023, underscoring the progress in safeguarding digital assets.
The increased adoption of offline hardware wallets and multi-signature wallets, both of which add critical layers of security, reflects this momentum. Advances in smart contract auditing tools and stronger compliance standards are also minimizing risks, creating a safer environment for both users and institutions.
These improvements highlight the industry’s commitment to establishing a more secure foundation for digital transactions and bolstering confidence in blockchain as a reliable financial technology.
In another positive development, in May 2023, the European Council approved the first comprehensive legal framework for the cryptocurrency industry. This legislation sets a new standard for regulatory transparency and oversight, further reinforcing trust.
Financial Literacy Initiatives
The rise of crypto education in the U.S. is playing a pivotal role in increasing public understanding and encouraging adoption. Programs such as Coinbase Earn aim to simplify the onboarding process for new users, directly addressing the complexity and security concerns that often deter people from engaging with crypto.
According to recent data, 43% of respondents feel that insufficient knowledge is a key reason they avoid the sector, highlighting the ongoing need for crypto-related learning.
Additionally, Chainalysis' 2024 Global Crypto Adoption Index noted a significant increase in crypto interest following the launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs in the U.S. earlier in the year. This development enabled investors to trade ETF shares tied to Bitcoin directly on stock exchanges, making it easier to enter the market without needing extensive technical expertise - thus driving a surge in adoption.
These advancements in security and education are gradually fostering greater trust in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. As the sector continues to evolve, these efforts may pave the way for broader adoption and deeper integration of digital assets into daily financial life.
The Future of Digital Asset Adoption
As digital assets continue to evolve and capture mainstream attention, their potential to transform the financial landscape is becoming increasingly evident. From late 2023 through early 2024, global crypto transaction volumes surged, surpassing the peaks of the 2021 bull market (as illustrated below).
Interestingly, much of this growth in adoption was driven by lower-middle income countries, highlighting the global reach of digital assets.
Below, we explore projections for cryptocurrency usage and its potential impact on traditional banking and finance.
Projections for Crypto Usage in the Next 5-10 Years
Several studies and reports offer insights into the expected growth of cryptocurrency over the next decade:
Global Adoption
The global cryptocurrency market revenue is projected to reach approximately $56.7 billion in 2024, with the United States leading the charge, expected to generate around $9.8 billion in revenue. Statista predicts the number of global crypto users will hit 861 million by 2025, marking a significant shift toward mainstream use.
Institutional Adoption
The 2023 Institutional Investor Digital Assets Study found that 65% of the 1,042 institutional investors surveyed plan to buy or invest in digital assets in the future.
As of 2024, digital currency usage among U.S. organisations is expanding, particularly in sectors such as finance, retail, and technology. Hundreds of financial services and fintech firms are now involved in digital assets, whether in payment processing, investments, or blockchain-based applications. This includes major companies utilising cryptocurrencies as stored value and exploring stablecoin use cases to enhance transaction efficiency.
Notably, major U.S. companies are increasingly engaging with blockchain and digital assets, as regulatory clarity improves and security concerns are addressed.
Retail Adoption
At present, about 85% of major retailers generating over $1 billion in annual online sales accept cryptocurrency payments. In contrast, 23% of mid-sized retailers, with online sales between $250 million and $1 billion, currently accept crypto payments. This growing trend points to an expanding role for digital assets in retail, especially among large-scale businesses.
Potential Impact on Traditional Banking and Finance
The rise of digital asset utilisation is poised to reshape traditional banking systems in multiple areas. For starters, the growth of blockchain technology and digitised financial services is driving the decentralised finance (DeFi) market, which is projected to reach $450 billion by 2030, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 46%.
In Q3 2024 alone, trading on decentralised exchanges surpassed $100 billion, marking the third consecutive month of growth in trading volume. This trend underscores the increasing interest and activity in the decentralised finance space.
As Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) are likely to be adopted by 80% of central banks by 2030, the role of commercial banks in money distribution could diminish significantly. Meanwhile, blockchain technology and stablecoins are expected to revolutionise cross-border B2B payments, with 20% of these transactions powered by blockchain by 2025. Stablecoin payment volumes are projected to hit $620 billion by 2026.
Furthermore, the investment landscape is set to evolve as asset tokenisation scales, potentially reaching a value of $16 trillion, making crypto a standard component in investment portfolios.
With regulatory clarity expected to improve - more than half of financial institutions anticipate clearer rules within the next three years - crypto integration is likely to become more widespread. These developments emphasise the transformative potential of digital assets across payments, investments, and financial structures globally.
Bridging the trust gap in crypto adoption
The cryptocurrency landscape is experiencing a surge in institutional interest, which could be a pivotal moment for integrating digital assets into traditional finance. Financial giants like BlackRock are at the forefront of this movement, signaling a shift in mainstream perception and adoption of cryptocurrencies.
Historically, the introduction of new investment vehicles around Bitcoin has spurred market growth. As Markus Thielen, founder of 10x Research, highlights, the launch of spot ETFs could bring about a new wave of institutional involvement, potentially driving the next phase of market expansion.
This growing institutional momentum, combined with evolving regulatory frameworks, is reshaping the crypto ecosystem. However, a key question remains: Will these developments be enough to close the trust gap and push cryptocurrencies into mainstream adoption?
As we stand at this crossroads, the future of digital assets hangs in the balance. The coming years will be critical in determining whether cryptocurrencies can overcome persistent skepticism and fully integrate into the global financial system, or if they will remain a niche, yet impactful, financial instrument.

Millennials and Gen Z are revolutionizing the financial landscape, leveraging cryptocurrencies to challenge traditional systems and redefine money itself. Curious about how this shift affects your financial future? Let's uncover the powerful changes they’re driving!
The financial world is undergoing a significant transformation, largely driven by Millennials and Gen Z. These digital-native generations are embracing cryptocurrencies at an unprecedented rate, challenging traditional financial systems and catalysing a shift toward new forms of digital finance, redefining how we perceive and interact with money.
This movement is not just a fleeting trend but a fundamental change that is redefining how we perceive and interact with money.
Digital Natives Leading the Way
Growing up in the digital age, Millennials (born 1981-1996) and Gen Z (born 1997-2012) are inherently comfortable with technology. This familiarity extends to their financial behaviours, with a noticeable inclination toward adopting innovative solutions like cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology.
According to the Grayscale Investments and Harris Poll Report which studied Americans, 44% agree that “crypto and blockchain technology are the future of finance.” Looking more closely at the demographics, Millenials and Gen Z’s expressed the highest levels of enthusiasm, underscoring the pivotal role younger generations play in driving cryptocurrency adoption.
Desire for Financial Empowerment and Inclusion
Economic challenges such as the 2008 financial crisis and the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have shaped these generations' perspectives on traditional finance. There's a growing scepticism toward conventional financial institutions and a desire for greater control over personal finances.
The Grayscale-Harris Poll found that 23% of those surveyed believe that cryptocurrencies are a long-term investment, up from 19% the previous year. The report also found that 41% of participants are currently paying more attention to Bitcoin and other crypto assets because of geopolitical tensions, inflation, and a weakening US dollar (up from 34%).
This sentiment fuels engagement with cryptocurrencies as viable investment assets and tools for financial empowerment.
Influence on Market Dynamics
The collective financial influence of Millennials and Gen Z is significant. Their active participation in cryptocurrency markets contributes to increased liquidity and shapes market trends. Social media platforms like Reddit, Twitter, and TikTok have become pivotal in disseminating information and investment strategies among these generations.
The rise of cryptocurrencies like Dogecoin and Shiba Inu demonstrates how younger investors leverage online communities to impact financial markets2. This phenomenon shows their ability to mobilise and drive market movements, challenging traditional investment paradigms.
Embracing Innovation and Technological Advancement
Cryptocurrencies represent more than just investment opportunities; they embody technological innovation that resonates with Millennials and Gen Z. Blockchain technology and digital assets are areas where these generations are not only users but also contributors.
A 2021 survey by Pew Research Center indicated that 31% of Americans aged 18-29 have invested in, traded, or used cryptocurrency, compared to just 8% of those aged 50-64. This significant disparity highlights the generational embrace of digital assets and the technologies underpinning them.
Impact on Traditional Financial Institutions
The shift toward cryptocurrencies is prompting traditional financial institutions to adapt. Banks, investment firms, and payment platforms are increasingly integrating crypto services to meet the evolving demands of younger clients.
Companies like PayPal and Square have expanded their cryptocurrency offerings, allowing users to buy, hold, and sell cryptocurrencies directly from their platforms. These developments signify the financial industry's recognition of the growing importance of cryptocurrencies.
Challenges and Considerations
While enthusiasm is high, challenges such as regulatory uncertainties, security concerns, and market volatility remain. However, Millennials and Gen Z appear willing to navigate these risks, drawn by the potential rewards and alignment with their values of innovation and financial autonomy.
In summary
Millennials and Gen Z are redefining the financial landscape, with their embrace of cryptocurrencies serving as a catalyst for broader change. This isn't just about alternative investments; it's a shift in how younger generations view financial systems and their place within them. Their drive for autonomy, transparency, and technological integration is pushing traditional institutions to innovate rapidly.
This generational influence extends beyond personal finance, potentially reshaping global economic structures. For industry players, from established banks to fintech startups, adapting to these changing preferences isn't just advantageous—it's essential for long-term viability.
As cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology mature, we're likely to see further transformations in how society interacts with money. Those who can navigate this evolving landscape, balancing innovation with stability, will be well-positioned for the future of finance. It's a complex shift, but one that offers exciting possibilities for a more inclusive and technologically advanced financial ecosystem. The financial world is changing, and it's the young guns who are calling the shots.

You might have heard of the "Travel Rule" before, but do you know what it actually mean? Let us dive into it for you.
What is the "Travel Rule"?
You might have heard of the "Travel Rule" before, but do you know what it actually mean? Well, let me break it down for you. The Travel Rule, also known as FATF Recommendation 16, is a set of measures aimed at combating money laundering and terrorism financing through financial transactions.
So, why is it called the Travel Rule? It's because the personal data of the transacting parties "travels" with the transfers, making it easier for authorities to monitor and regulate these transactions. See, now it all makes sense!
The Travel Rule applies to financial institutions engaged in virtual asset transfers and crypto companies, collectively referred to as virtual asset service providers (VASPs). These VASPs have to obtain and share "required and accurate originator information and required beneficiary information" with counterparty VASPs or financial institutions during or before the transaction.
To make things more practical, the FATF recommends that countries adopt a de minimis threshold of 1,000 USD/EUR for virtual asset transfers. This means that transactions below this threshold would have fewer requirements compared to those exceeding it.
For transfers of Virtual Assets falling below the de minimis threshold, Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) are required to gather:
- The identities of the sender (originator) and receiver (beneficiary).
- Either the wallet address associated with each transaction involving Virtual Assets (VAs) or a unique reference number assigned to the transaction.
- Verification of this gathered data is not obligatory, unless any suspicious circumstances concerning money laundering or terrorism financing arise. In such instances, it becomes essential to verify customer information.
Conversely, for transfers surpassing the de minimis threshold, VASPs are obligated to collect more extensive particulars, encompassing:
- Full name of the sender (originator).
- The account number employed by the sender (originator) for processing the transaction, such as a wallet address.
- The physical (geographical) address of the sender (originator), national identity number, a customer identification number that uniquely distinguishes the sender to the ordering institution, or details like date and place of birth.
- Name of the receiver (beneficiary).
- Account number of the receiver (beneficiary) utilized for transaction processing, similar to a wallet address.
By following these guidelines, virtual asset service providers can contribute to a safer and more transparent virtual asset ecosystem while complying with international regulations on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism. It's all about ensuring the integrity of financial transactions and safeguarding against illicit activities.
Implementation of the Travel Rule in the United Kingdom
A notable shift is anticipated in the United Kingdom's oversight of the virtual asset sector, commencing September 1, 2023.
This seminal development comes in the form of the Travel Rule, which falls under Part 7A of the Money Laundering Regulations 2017. Designed to combat money laundering and terrorist financing within the virtual asset industry, this new regulation expands the information-sharing requirements for wire transfers to encompass virtual asset transfers.
The HM Treasury of the UK has meticulously customized the provisions of the revised Wire Transfer Regulations to cater to the unique demands of the virtual asset sector. This underscores the government's unwavering commitment to fostering a secure and transparent financial ecosystem. Concurrently, it signals their resolve to enable the virtual asset industry to flourish.
The Travel Rule itself originates from the updated version of the Financial Action Task Force's recommendation on information-sharing requirements for wire transfers. By extending these recommendations to cover virtual asset transfers, the UK aspires to significantly mitigate the risk of illicit activities within the sector.
Undoubtedly, the Travel Rule heralds a landmark stride forward in regulating the virtual asset industry in the UK. By extending the ambit of information-sharing requirements and fortifying oversight over virtual asset firms
Implementation of the Travel Rule in the European Union
Prepare yourself, as a new regulation called the Travel Rule is set to be introduced in the world of virtual assets within the European Union. Effective from December 30, 2024, this rule will take effect precisely 18 months after the initial enforcement of the Transfer of Funds Regulation.
Let's delve into the details of the Travel Rule. When it comes to information requirements, there will be no distinction made between cross-border transfers and transfers within the EU. The revised Transfer of Funds regulation recognizes all virtual asset transfers as cross-border, acknowledging the borderless nature and global reach of such transactions and services.
Now, let's discuss compliance obligations. To ensure adherence to these regulations, European Crypto Asset Service Providers (CASPs) must comply with certain measures. For transactions exceeding 1,000 EUR with self-hosted wallets, CASPs are obligated to collect crucial originator and beneficiary information. Additionally, CASPs are required to fulfill additional wallet verification obligations.
The implementation of these measures within the European Union aims to enhance transparency and mitigate potential risks associated with virtual asset transfers. For individuals involved in this domain, it is of utmost importance to stay informed and adhere to these new guidelines in order to ensure compliance.
What does the travel rules means to me as user?
As a user in the virtual asset industry, the implementation of the Travel Rule brings some significant changes that are designed to enhance the security and transparency of financial transactions. This means that when you engage in virtual asset transfers, certain personal information will now be shared between the involved parties. While this might sound intrusive at first, it plays a crucial role in combating fraud, money laundering, and terrorist financing.
The Travel Rule aims to create a safer environment for individuals like you by reducing the risks associated with illicit activities. This means that you can have greater confidence in the legitimacy of the virtual asset transactions you engage in. The regulation aims to weed out illicit activities and promote a level playing field for legitimate users. This fosters trust and confidence among users, attracting more participants and further driving the growth and development of the industry.
However, it's important to note that complying with this rule may require you to provide additional information to virtual asset service providers. Your privacy and the protection of your personal data remain paramount, and service providers are bound by strict regulations to ensure the security of your information.
In summary, the Travel Rule is a positive development for digital asset users like yourself, as it contributes to a more secure and trustworthy virtual asset industry.
Unlocking Compliance and Seamless Experiences: Tap's Proactive Approach to Upcoming Regulations
Tap is fully committed to upholding regulatory compliance, while also prioritizing a seamless and enjoyable customer experience. In order to achieve this delicate balance, Tap has proactively sought out partnerships with trusted solution providers and is actively engaged in industry working groups. By collaborating with experts in the field, Tap ensures it remains on the cutting edge of best practices and innovative solutions.
These efforts not only demonstrate Tap's dedication to compliance, but also contribute to creating a secure and transparent environment for its users. By staying ahead of the curve, Tap can foster trust and confidence in the cryptocurrency ecosystem, reassuring customers that their financial transactions are safe and protected.
But Tap's commitment to compliance doesn't mean sacrificing user experience. On the contrary, Tap understands the importance of providing a seamless journey for its customers. This means that while regulatory requirements may be changing, Tap is working diligently to ensure that users can continue to enjoy a smooth and hassle-free experience.
By combining a proactive approach to compliance with a determination to maintain user satisfaction, Tap is setting itself apart as a trusted leader in the financial technology industry. So rest assured, as Tap evolves in response to new regulations, your experience as a customer will remain top-notch and worry-free.
Unveiling the future of money: Explore the game-changing Central Bank Digital Currencies and their potential impact on finance.
Since the debut of Bitcoin in 2009, central banks have been living in fear of the disruptive technology that is cryptocurrency. Distributed ledger technology has revolutionized the digital world and has continued to challenge the corruption of central bank morals.
Financial institutions can’t beat or control cryptocurrency, so they are joining them in creating digital currencies. Governments have now been embracing digital currencies in the form of CBDCs, otherwise known as central bank digital currencies.
Central bank digital currencies are digital tokens, similar to cryptocurrency, issued by a central bank. They are pegged to the value of that country's fiat currency, acting as a digital currency version of the national currency. CBDCs are created and regulated by a country's central bank and monetary authorities.
A central bank digital currency is generally created for a sense of financial inclusion and to improve the application of monetary and fiscal policy. Central banks adopting currency in digital form presents great benefits for the federal reserve system as well as citizens, but there are some cons lurking behind the central bank digital currency facade.
Types of central bank digital currencies
While the concept of a central bank digital currency is quite easy to understand, there are layers to central bank money in its digital form. Before we take a deep dive into the possibilities presented by the central banks and their digital money, we will break down the different types of central bank digital currencies.
Wholesale CBDCs
Wholesale central bank digital currencies are targeted at financial institutions, whereby reserve balances are held within a central bank. This integration assists the financial system and institutions in improving payment systems and security payment efficiency.
This is much simpler than rolling out a central bank digital currency to the whole country but provides support for large businesses when they want to transfer money. These digital payments would also act as a digital ledger and aid in the avoidance of money laundering.
Retail CBDCs
A retail central bank digital currency refers to government-backed digital assets used between businesses and customers. This type of central bank digital currency is aimed at traditional currency, acting as a digital version of physical currency. These digital assets would allow retail payment systems, direct P2P CBDC transactions, as well as international settlements among businesses. It would be similar to having a bank account, where you could digitally transfer money through commercial banks, except the currency would be in the form of a digital yuan or euro, rather than the federal reserve of currency held by central banks.
Pros and cons of a central bank digital currency (CBDC)
Central banks are looking for ways to keep their money in the country, as opposed to it being spent on buying cryptocurrencies, thus losing it to a global market. As digital currencies become more popular, each central bank must decide whether they want to fight it or profit from the potential. Regardless of adoption, central banks creating their own digital currencies comes with benefits and disadvantages to users that you need to know.
Pros of central bank digital currency (CBDC)
- Cross border payments
- Track money laundering activity
- Secure international monetary fund
- Reduces risk of commercial bank collapse
- Cheaper
- More secure
- Promotes financial inclusion
Cons of central bank digital currency (CDBC)
- Central banks have complete control
- No anonymity of digital currency transfers
- Cybersecurity issues
- Price reliant on fiat currency equivalent
- Physical money may be eliminated
- Ban of distributed ledger technology and cryptocurrency
Central bank digital currency conclusion
Central bank money in an electronic form has been a big debate in the blockchain technology space, with so many countries considering the possibility. The European Central Bank, as well as other central banks, have been considering the possibility of central bank digital currencies as a means of improving the financial system. The Chinese government is in the midst of testing out their e-CNY, which some are calling the digital yuan. They have seen great success so far, but only after completely banning Bitcoin trading.
There is a lot of good that can come from CBDCs, but the benefits are mostly for the federal reserve system and central banks. Bank-account holders and citizens may have their privacy compromised and their investment options limited if the world adopts CBDCs.
It's important to remember that central bank digital currencies are not cryptocurrencies. They do not compete with cryptocurrencies and the benefits of blockchain technology. Their limited use cases can only be applied when reinforced by a financial system authority. Only time will tell if CBDCs will succeed, but right now you can appreciate the advantages brought to you by crypto.
Tap makes entering the Bitcoin world simple. Buy, sell, hold, and trade Bitcoin easily on our secure platform.
Welcome to this week's Crypto Update, your go-to destination for the latest news in the exciting world of cryptocurrencies. Let's dive right into the highlights of the past week in the dynamic crypto market.
Etherscan's AI Tool for Smart Contracts:
Etherscan has launched Code Reader, an advanced tool that utilizes AI to retrieve and interpret source code from specific Ethereum contract addresses. Code Reader leverages OpenAI's powerful language model to generate comprehensive insights into contract source code files. The tool allows users to gain a deeper understanding of contract code, access comprehensive lists of smart contract functions, and explore contract interactions with decentralized applications. To access and utilize Code Reader, users need a valid OpenAI API Key and sufficient OpenAI usage limits. However, researchers caution about the challenges posed by current AI models, including computing power limitations, data synchronization, network optimization, and privacy concerns.
SEC's increased scrutiny on cryptocurrencies sparks debate:
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) increased scrutiny has led to a prominent debate concerning the future of XRP and Ethereum. Max Keiser, a well-known Bitcoin advocate, predicts the downfall of XRP and Ethereum due to regulatory overreach. In contrast, John Deaton, representing XRP holders, opposes this view, arguing for a more balanced regulatory approach. The cryptocurrency community is now anxiously awaiting regulatory clarity, as the SEC's actions remain unpredictable.
It's important to note that the regulatory environment is constantly evolving and can have significant impacts on the cryptocurrency market, including Ethereum. Therefore, it is advisable to stay informed about the latest developments.
A Call for Clarity: Federal reserve governor advocates for clearer crypto regulations:
Michelle Bowman, a Federal Reserve Governor, has urged global regulators to establish clearer regulations for emerging banking activities, particularly banking as a service and digital assets. She emphasized the need for a well-defined regulatory framework to address the supervisory void and uncertainties that financial institutions currently face. Bowman's call aligns with the growing demand for enhanced regulation of digital assets. A robust and comprehensive regulatory framework is crucial for ensuring the stability and integrity of the banking sector, mitigating risks, protecting consumers, and fostering innovation.
Turkish lira hit a record low against the US dollar
The Turkish lira hit a historic low, trading at 25.74 per US dollar, following Turkey's central bank decision to raise interest rates by 650 basis points to 15%. While the hike was expected, it fell short of the anticipated 21%, and analysts believe a larger increase was needed to show the government's resolve to fight inflation. The lira's devaluation has been part of a larger trend, prompting citizens to invest in alternative assets like digital currencies and gold. The central bank, now under new leadership, has adopted a more gradual approach to rate adjustments, seeking to stabilize the economy. However, the uncertainty surrounding Turkey's economic future persists.
Biggest Movers on Tap - Last 7 days

LATEST ARTICLE

Remember when crypto was just about pizza?
In 2010, Laszlo Hanyecz paid 10,000 Bitcoin for two Papa John's pizzas, a transaction now worth over $1 billion. Gut punch aside, crypto enthusiasts celebrate this first real-world integration every 22 May as "Bitcoin Pizza Day."
Back then, the entire crypto ecosystem could fit into a few obscure forums where libertarian idealists and coding cowboys traded digital tokens like baseball cards, convinced they were building the future from their basements. In hindsight, they were.
Fast forward to today, and that scrappy subculture has evolved into something unrecognisable from its meme-driven origins. Nike is dropping NFT sneakers. Major banks hold crypto assets. Entire countries are experimenting with digital currencies. The rebellious energy that once fueled late-night Discord raids and "diamond hands" memes has crystallised into legitimate businesses, governance protocols, and entirely new economic models.
But here's what's fascinating: crypto didn't just grow up by abandoning its roots, it’s matured by doubling down on them. The community-first mentality that built Bitcoin is now reshaping how we think about ownership, identity, and value creation in the digital age.
This isn't a story about crypto going mainstream by becoming boring. It's about a culture that learned to channel its revolutionary spirit into building the infrastructure for tomorrow's economy, while somehow keeping its irreverent soul intact.

From meme coins to maturity: the evolution of crypto culture
Remember the early days of crypto culture, where things were gloriously chaotic? A community united by shared jokes about "HODLing" (born from a drunken misspelling of "hold"), treating every market crash as a buying opportunity, and genuinely believing that traditional finance was destined for the dustbin of history. The culture was equal parts utopian manifesto and internet meme factory.
And it wasn't just rebellious posturing, it was the emergence of genuinely new social norms.
Crypto communities developed their own language (think "WAGMI," "ape in," "moon"), their own heroes (Satoshi's mysterious disappearance became legendary), and their own values centred around decentralisation, permissionless innovation, and radical transparency. Forums like BitcoinTalk and subreddits became digital town squares where code was law and reputation was earned through contribution, not credentials.
But cultures mature through adversity, and crypto has weathered some brutal winters. The 2018 crash wiped out over 80% of the market's value. The 2022 collapse saw major players like FTX implode spectacularly.
Each crisis forced the community to evolve, weeding out pure speculation while strengthening the foundations of legitimate innovation. The survivors weren't just the hodlers; they were the builders who kept shipping code through bear markets.
What emerged from these trials and tribulations was a culture that kept its revolutionary energy but channelled it more strategically.
The meme coins didn't disappear, they just became one flavour in a much richer ecosystem. Fast forward to today, where crypto culture balances its anti-establishment DNA with the practical work of building alternatives to the systems it once merely criticised.
Why the crypto ecosystem is no longer just a subculture
Somewhere between the pizza transactions and the present day, crypto stopped being a niche hobby and became infrastructure. Real estate transactions are settling on blockchain networks. Identity verification happens through decentralised protocols. Entire financial systems run on code that anyone can audit, and no single entity controls.
The rise of Decentralised Autonomous Organisations (DAOs) exemplifies this maturation.
What started as an experimental governance model has evolved into a practical tool for coordinating everything from investment funds to open-source software development. DAOs like Uniswap and Compound manage billions in assets through community governance, hushing the haters and proving that decentralised decision-making can work at scale.
Meanwhile, DeFi has created a parallel financial infrastructure that operates 24/7, serves global users without permission, and offers yields that traditional banks can't match. Creator economies have exploded as artists, musicians, and content creators tokenise their work and build direct relationships with their audiences. These aren't experiments anymore, they're functioning businesses generating real revenue and solving real problems.
Perhaps most tellingly, regulatory frameworks are finally catching up. When governments start creating clear rules for an industry, that's usually a sign it's moved beyond the experimental phase.
The role of Web3 in shaping new digital identities
Let’s shine a light on Web3 - no longer just a “technical upgrade,” but now a fundamental shift in how people relate to their digital lives. For the first time in internet history, users can truly own their online identities, content, and social connections. While, admittedly, it’s still in its early stages, it's still creating new economic opportunities for millions of people.
Gamers are leading the charge in another direction, earning real income through play-to-earn games and trading in-game assets as NFTs. What seems like fun and games is actually a new form of digital labour, with some players in developing countries earning more from virtual economies than traditional jobs provide.
However you feel about Web3, you cannot deny that the cultural shift here is profound: digital activities that were once purely recreational are becoming legitimate career paths.
Investing beyond the hype: what smart money looks like now
Thankfully, the days of throwing money at anything with "coin" in the name are largely over. Today's sophisticated crypto investors approach the space with the same rigour they'd apply to any emerging technology sector, which is to say, a lot more rigour than the early "number go up" mentality.
Modern crypto investing focuses heavily on tokenomics: the economic design of how tokens are created, distributed, and used within their ecosystems. Smart investors analyse token supply schedules, utility functions, governance mechanisms, and community incentive structures. They're looking for projects that create genuine value, not just speculative buzz.
Due diligence now includes evaluating team credentials, technology innovation, product-market fit, and regulatory compliance. The most successful crypto investors today often have backgrounds in traditional venture capital or technology, bringing institutional-grade analysis to a previously amateur-dominated space.
They're backing teams building long-term infrastructure, not chasing the latest meme coin pump.
This maturation has also created new investment categories. There's now a clear distinction between speculative trading, strategic token investments, and equity stakes in crypto companies. Even institutional players like pension funds and endowments are entering the space through regulated products, bringing both capital and credibility.
The cultural shift is striking: crypto conferences now feature more suit-wearing fund managers than hoodie-wearing day traders. But the underlying belief in decentralised systems remains strong - it's just being expressed through more sophisticated financial instruments.
Community, governance, and cultural legitimacy
Consider this: crypto's greatest innovation might not be technical, it might be social.
The ecosystem has pioneered new models of community organisation that traditional institutions are now studying and adopting.
- Discord servers with hundreds of thousands of members coordinate global initiatives.
- GitHub repositories with contributors from every continent build open-source infrastructure.
- Governance tokens give stakeholders direct voting power on protocol decisions.
This community-first approach has proven remarkably resilient. When centralised exchanges fail or regulations threaten specific projects, the decentralised nature of crypto communities allows them to adapt and continue building. The culture's emphasis on transparency, open-source development, and collective ownership creates natural resistance to single points of failure.
Cultural legitimacy has arrived through an unexpected channel: brand adoption. When Nike launches NFT collections, Budweiser buys Ethereum domain names, and H&M experiments with blockchain supply chains, it signals that crypto has moved from counterculture to culture.
These aren't tech companies hedging their bets: they're traditional brands recognising that their customers expect digital ownership options.
So, what's next for crypto culture?
The next wave is already building. Real-world assets (from rental properties to intellectual property) will trade as tokens around the clock. Gen Z, raised on digital scarcity and creator economies, will make crypto-first living the norm.
Challenges remain: regulation, interoperability, and sustainability. But crypto culture thrives on adversity, turning every crisis into an upgrade opportunity.
The culture that started with a Papa John’s purchase has fundamentally rewired how we think about money, ownership, and coordination. This isn't just growing up, it's growing into the foundation of tomorrow's economy.
And somewhere, Laszlo Hanyecz is probably still enjoying pizza, though he's probably paying with dollars these days.

Euro Tether (EURT) is a euro-pegged stablecoin created by Tether Operations Limited, designed to maintain a 1:1 value with the euro. Think of it as the European cousin of the more famous USDT (Tether USD) - it's a digital token that aims to hold steady at one euro per token, making it useful for businesses, or just people who want to use crypto without worrying about wild price swings.
Built primarily on the Ethereum blockchain, EURT was developed to give European users and businesses a stable digital asset that mirrors the euro's value. However, there's an important twist to this story: Tether announced in November 2024 that EURT would be discontinued, with a redemption deadline of 27 November 2025, due to regulatory challenges in Europe and the implementation of the EU's MiCA regulations.
Who created EURT and why?
EURT comes from Tether Operations Limited, the same company behind USDT, which is currently the world's largest stablecoin by market cap, and a major player in the stablecoin space since 2014.
The reasoning behind creating EURT was straightforward: while USDT served dollar-based users well, there was a clear need for a euro-denominated stablecoin. European businesses, traders, and crypto users wanted a way to:
- Hold digital assets without exposure to crypto volatility
- Make fast, borderless payments in euros
- Access decentralised finance (DeFi) applications with euro-based assets
- Trade cryptocurrencies while maintaining euro exposure
Think of it like having a digital euro that could move as quickly as an email, without needing traditional banking infrastructure for every transaction.
How does EURT work?
EURT operates on a relatively simple principle that's common among centralised stablecoins. Here's how the process works:
Minting new EURT: When someone wants to create new EURT tokens, they deposit euros with Tether. In return, Tether mints (creates) an equivalent amount of EURT tokens. It's like exchanging physical euros for digital IOUs that can be used in the crypto world.
Burning EURT: When users want to redeem their EURT for actual euros, they send their tokens back to Tether. The company then "burns" (destroys) those tokens and returns the equivalent euros to the user's bank account.
Maintaining the Peg: Tether claims to hold euro reserves equal to the number of EURT tokens in circulation. This 1:1 backing is what's supposed to keep each EURT worth exactly one euro. If demand increases, more tokens are minted. If demand decreases, tokens are burned.
EURT primarily operates on Ethereum, but it has also been available on other blockchains like Solana and Binance Smart Chain, depending on user demand and technical considerations.
What was EURT used for?
Before its discontinuation announcement, EURT served several practical purposes in the crypto ecosystem:
Trading and avoiding volatility
Traders used EURT as a stable store of value when they wanted to exit volatile crypto positions without converting back to traditional banking systems. It’s like having a safe harbour during crypto storms.
Cross-border payments
EURT enabled fast, relatively cheap international transfers in euros. Instead of using traditional wire transfers, which can take days and incur significant fees, users can send EURT tokens across borders in minutes.
DeFi applications
EURT found a familiar home on DeFi platforms, used for lending, borrowing, and yield farming activities. Users could earn interest on their euro holdings or use EURT as collateral for loans.
Business operations
Some European businesses accepted EURT for payments or used it for treasury management, especially those already comfortable with crypto operations.
Why is EURT being discontinued?
This is where the story takes an interesting turn. On 27 November 2024, Tether announced that EURT would be phased out, with all tokens needing to be redeemed by 27 November 2025.
The primary reason? Europe's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, which came into effect in 2024. MiCA requires stablecoin issuers operating in the EU to meet strict compliance standards, including:
- Detailed regulatory reporting
- Specific reserve requirements
- Ongoing supervision by EU authorities
- Substantial compliance infrastructure
For Tether, the cost-benefit analysis didn't add up. EURT had a relatively small market capitalisation of around $27 million at the time of discontinuation, tiny compared to USDT's market cap of over $100 billion. The regulatory compliance costs and operational complexity of meeting MiCA requirements weren't justified by EURT's limited adoption.
It's essentially a business decision: the juice wasn't worth the squeeze for a product that hadn't gained significant market traction.
What's replacing EURT?
Tether isn't completely abandoning the European market. The company has partnered with Quantoz Payments to develop EURQ, a new euro-pegged stablecoin designed from the ground up to comply with MiCA regulations.
EURQ is being built with regulatory compliance as a core feature rather than an afterthought. This means it should be able to operate legally within the European Union's new regulatory framework without the compliance headaches that led to EURT's discontinuation.
However, EURQ is still in development, and there's no confirmed launch date yet. European users looking for euro-denominated stablecoins will need to explore other options in the meantime.
How does EURT compare to other stablecoins?
Understanding EURT's place in the stablecoin landscape helps explain both its purpose and its limitations:
EURT vs USDT (Tether USD)
USDT is EURT's dollar-denominated sibling and is massively more popular. While they work similarly, USDT benefits from the dollar's dominance in global trade and crypto markets. EURT never achieved anywhere near USDT's adoption levels.
EURT vs USDC (USD Coin)
USDC, issued by Circle, is generally considered more transparent and regulated than Tether's offerings. Circle regularly publishes detailed attestations of its reserves. EURT lacked this level of transparency and regulatory clarity.
EURT vs DAI
DAI is a decentralised stablecoin that's not controlled by a single company. While EURT required trusting Tether's reserves and management, DAI is backed by crypto collateral and governed by a decentralised community. However, DAI is primarily dollar-pegged.
EURT vs VNX VEUR
VNX VEUR is another euro-pegged stablecoin that's designed to be MiCA-compliant from the start. Unlike EURT, it was built with European regulations in mind and continues to operate in the EU market.
How to sell or convert EURT (if you still hold it)
If you currently hold EURT tokens, you have until 27 November 2025 to redeem them. A word of warning: try not to wait until the last minute as liquidity for EURT may decrease as the deadline approaches, potentially making it harder to convert at favourable rates.
You can sell or convert EURT on most major platforms.
The bottom line on EURT
Euro Tether represented an interesting experiment in euro-denominated stablecoins, but it ultimately couldn't overcome the challenges of regulatory compliance and limited adoption. However, not all is lost: its discontinuation highlights the growing importance of regulatory clarity in the crypto space, especially in Europe.
For users who relied on EURT, the transition period provides time to move to alternative solutions. The development of EURQ and other MiCA-compliant euro stablecoins suggests that demand for euro-denominated digital assets remains strong - it's just a matter of building products that can thrive in the new regulatory environment.

There has been an influx of conversation about Proof of Work (PoW) and Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus mechanisms recently. But what do these really mean? In this article, we're fleshing out what they are, how they work, and how they differ from each other.
The shift from traditional PoW systems to more modern PoS alternatives represents one of the most significant developments in crypto history. Understanding these mechanisms isn't just academic curiosity - it directly impacts energy consumption, transaction speeds, security models, and the future sustainability of blockchain networks.
Whether you're considering which cryptocurrencies to invest in or simply want to understand the technology behind your digital assets, grasping these fundamental concepts is fairly important.
What is a consensus mechanism in crypto?
Before we get started, let's first address what a consensus mechanism is.
Whether PoW or PoS, the consensus mechanism is the agreed-upon protocol that the entire network will use to maintain and operate the blockchain. It looks at how transactions are verified, the amount of energy they require and how new coins enter circulation. The consensus mechanism is effectively the protocol that keeps all the computers on the network in check.
Think of a consensus mechanism as the rulebook that all participants in a blockchain network must follow. Without it, there would be no way to prevent double-spending (the digital equivalent of spending the same dollar twice). These mechanisms ensure that all participants agree on the current state of the ledger, maintaining the integrity and security that make cryptocurrencies valuable.
While PoW and PoS are the most prominent consensus mechanisms, others exist, including Proof of Authority (PoA) and Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS). Each serves specific use cases and comes with unique trade-offs between security, speed, and decentralisation.
What is Proof of Work (PoW)?
Proof of Work might be the most well-known of the two as Bitcoin, the first cryptocurrency to come into existence, uses it. Despite what many think, this was not when the consensus mechanism was created. It dates back before crypto's integration into the financial sector, right back to the early 1990s when it was initially used as a means to mitigate email spam.
The system worked in such a way that sending an email required a small amount of work to send one email, and a large amount to send out mass spam emails. Alongside blockchain technology, Satoshi Nakamoto reworked these concepts to create the first digital currency. While the electricity and money implications remained the same, he eradicated the need for human intervention.
The blockchain is made up of blocks containing data pertaining to the network, stored in chronological order. The first block on the blockchain is known as the Genesis block and is hardcoded into its software. Each block after that references the previous block and contains an updated version of the blockchain. Still with me? Let’s dive deeper.
New blocks are added to the network by miners who compete with each other to solve a complex cryptographic puzzle. The first to complete the puzzle gets to execute the transactions and receive the miner's fee (a reward for their time and energy).
The process of miners racing to finish the puzzle is known as hashing, as miners are guessing a string of pseudorandom numbers, known as hashes. Once a miner establishes the winning hash, it is broadcast to the network for all the nodes (network of computers) to verify whether it is correct or not. If it is correct, the block is added to the blockchain, and the miner receives the reward.
The reward is new coins that are then minted and added to circulation. In the case of Bitcoin, freshly minted BTC will be distributed to the miners, with this number reducing each time the blockchain reaches a certain number of blocks. This is called a halving and takes place every 210,000 blocks (which takes place roughly every 4 years). Halvings keep the cryptocurrency deflationary and finite.
Examples of Proof of Work cryptocurrencies
Major PoW cryptocurrencies include Bitcoin, Litecoin, Dogecoin, and Ethereum Classic. These networks have demonstrated remarkable security over the years of operation, with Bitcoin alone processing over $19 trillion in transaction volume in 2024 without a successful attack on its consensus mechanism.
However, this security comes at the cost of significant energy consumption, with Bitcoin's network alone consuming more electricity than some countries.
What is Proof of Stake (PoS)?
Proof of Stake was first introduced to the world through Peercoin in 2012, gaining more traction when Ethereum began implementing PoS in 2020 with the launch of Beacon Chain, and fully transitioned via The Merge in 2022.
Considered a more "energy-efficient" means of operating crypto networks, instead of using energy to race to find the winning hash, PoS focuses on participation in the network by looking at ownership in terms of the coin's total supply. PoS was designed to solve the energy problems that PoW platforms created.
Unlike PoW, which requires specialised mining equipment (ASICs), PoS validation can be done on standard hardware, provided there is stable internet and enough ETH staked.
Instead of a number of miners racing at the same time to solve the same puzzle, the PoS algorithm pseudo-randomly selects a node that will be responsible for verifying the transactions.
This election is based on the number of coins that a particular node holds. Once selected, the node verifies and signs off on the validity of the transactions and proposes the block to the network. Once the network accepts, the block is added to the blockchain in the same chronological order as the PoW consensus.
Nodes are selected by engaging in a process called staking. They are required to stake (lock) their funds on the platform as collateral in order to be selected. In order not to favour the richest of the nodes, the algorithm will typically also favour how long the funds have been staked for and add an element of randomisation.
As there is no competition between the miners to race to solve the puzzle, this process is referred to as minting or forging on the PoS networks. The cost implications are specific to that of the platform.
PoS networks often implement additional mechanisms to ensure fairness and security. Slashing is a penalty system where validators can lose a portion of their staked tokens if they act maliciously or fail to properly validate transactions. This economic incentive structure replaces the computational cost of PoW with financial risk, creating a different but equally effective deterrent against bad actors.
Examples of Proof of Stake cryptocurrencies
Leading PoS cryptocurrencies include Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, Polkadot, and Avalanche. These networks can process thousands of transactions per second while consuming a fraction of the energy required by PoW systems, making them attractive for applications requiring high throughput and environmental sustainability.
Proof of Work vs. Proof of Stake: key differences
Aspect | Proof of Work | Proof of Stake |
---|---|---|
Energy Use | Extremely high - requires massive computational power | Low - minimal electricity needed for validation |
Security Model | Computational cost makes attacks expensive | Economic penalties (slashing) deter malicious behaviour |
Scalability | Limited - Bitcoin processes ~7 TPS | High - can handle thousands of TPS |
Decentralisation | High but concentrated in mining pools | Potentially high but wealth concentration is a concern |
Barrier to Entry | High - requires expensive mining equipment | Lower - requires holding tokens to stake |
Environmental Impact | Significant carbon footprint | Minimal environmental impact |
Economic Incentives | Mining rewards decrease over time (halvings) | Consistent staking rewards based on participation |
The differences extend beyond these technical aspects. PoW networks tend to have more predictable issuance schedules and have proven their resilience over longer periods.
PoS networks also offer more flexibility in governance and can implement upgrades more easily, but they're still relatively new compared to established PoW systems.
Industry experts have varying perspectives on these trade-offs. Fidelity Digital Assets noted that PoW's "proven track record" gives it advantages in terms of demonstrated security, while others argue that PoS represents the natural evolution of blockchain technology toward greater efficiency and sustainability.
Pros and cons of PoW and PoS
Proof of Work: advantages and disadvantages
Advantages:
- PoW systems offer unparalleled security through their requirement for massive computational investment, making 51% attacks on networks like Bitcoin practically impossible to execute due to the enormous costs involved.
- These systems have demonstrated remarkable stability over more than a decade of operation, processing trillions of dollars in value with zero successful attacks on their core consensus mechanisms.
- The decentralised nature of mining operations, while concentrated in pools, still maintains a high degree of censorship resistance and network independence.
- PoW has a proven track record that provides confidence to institutional investors and long-term holders seeking maximum security for their assets.
Disadvantages:
- The energy consumption of PoW networks has become their most criticised aspect, with Bitcoin alone consuming more electricity than countries like Argentina.
- Transaction throughput remains severely limited, creating bottlenecks during periods of high demand and resulting in dramatically increased fees for users.
- The environmental impact has led to regulatory scrutiny in various jurisdictions, with some countries banning or restricting PoW mining operations.
- The high barrier to entry for mining has created concerns about centralisation in regions with cheap electricity, potentially concentrating power in specific geographic areas.
Proof of Stake: advantages and disadvantages
Advantages:
- PoS systems consume dramatically less energy while maintaining strong security through economic incentives rather than computational waste, reducing environmental impact by over 99%.
- They can process transactions much faster and at lower costs, making them suitable for everyday use and complex applications like DeFi.
- The lower barrier to entry allows more participants to earn rewards through staking, potentially leading to better decentralisation and broader network participation.
- These systems offer more flexibility for implementing upgrades and governance changes, allowing networks to evolve more rapidly in response to user needs.
Disadvantages:
- PoS networks are relatively new and haven't been tested over the same timeframes as PoW systems, creating uncertainty about their long-term security properties under extreme conditions.
- The "rich get richer" dynamic, where larger stakes earn proportionally more rewards, could lead to centralisation over time as wealth concentrates among the largest validators.
- Some critics argue that PoS systems are less censorship-resistant because validators can be more easily identified and potentially coerced by authorities or malicious actors.
- The complexity of slashing mechanisms and validator requirements introduces new types of risks for participants, including the potential for technical errors to result in financial losses.
It’s worth noting that Ethereum's successful transition to PoS through "The Merge" in September 2022 provided significant validation for the PoS model, demonstrating that large, valuable networks can successfully implement this consensus mechanism while maintaining security and functionality.
Why did Ethereum move to Proof of Stake?
Ethereum's transition from PoW to PoS, known as "The Merge," arguably represented one of the most significant technical achievements in crypto history. The upgrade, completed in September 2022, was driven by several critical factors that had been limiting Ethereum's growth and adoption.
The primary motivation was scalability. Ethereum's PoW system could only process about 15 transactions per second, creating severe bottlenecks as the network grew. High gas fees during peak usage periods made the network unsuitable for many applications, particularly those requiring frequent, small-value transactions.
The PoS system laid the groundwork for future upgrades that would dramatically increase transaction throughput.
Environmental concerns were a key factor in the shift, with the move to PoS cutting energy use by over 99%, directly tackling one of crypto’s biggest criticisms.
The economic shift was significant. Under its proof‑of‑work system, Ethereum paid out roughly $5 billion annually to miners via block rewards. After the Merge, those rewards shrank by over 80%, now going to validators who stake ETH—an approach widely seen as more sustainable. At the same time, the protocol burns a major portion of transaction fees under EIP‑1559, making ETH potentially deflationary during high usage.
The successful completion of The Merge sent a powerful signal to the broader crypto industry about the viability of PoS systems. It demonstrated that even large, complex networks with billions of dollars in value could successfully transition to more efficient consensus mechanisms without compromising security or functionality.
Which is more secure: PoW or PoS?
The security debate between PoW and PoS systems involves fundamentally different approaches to protecting blockchain networks. Both have proven effective, but they operate on distinct principles that create unique strengths and vulnerabilities.
Security
PoW security relies on the economic cost of mounting an attack. To successfully attack a PoW network, an adversary would need to control more than 50% of the network's hash rate, requiring massive investments in specialised hardware and electricity.
For Bitcoin, this would cost billions of dollars and require more mining equipment than currently exists. The beauty of this system lies in its simplicity - the security assumptions are straightforward and have been tested over many years.
PoS security operates through economic penalties rather than computational costs. Validators must stake significant amounts of the network's native token as collateral. If they act maliciously or fail to properly validate transactions, they face slashing: the permanent loss of their staked tokens. This economic incentive structure ensures that honest behaviour is more profitable than attempting to attack the network.
Centralisation
Each system faces different types of centralisation risks. PoW networks can become centralised through mining pools and the concentration of mining operations in regions with cheap electricity. PoS networks face the risk of wealth concentration, where large stakeholders could potentially gain disproportionate control over the network.
The "nothing at stake" problem, often cited as a weakness of PoS, has been largely addressed through sophisticated slashing mechanisms and finality rules. Modern PoS implementations include penalties that make it economically irrational to validate conflicting blockchain histories.
Which is better?
Experts remain divided on which system offers superior long-term security. The reality is that both systems can be highly secure when properly implemented, with the choice often depending on other factors like energy efficiency, scalability, and governance requirements.
The future of blockchain consensus mechanisms
The evolution of consensus mechanisms continues beyond the PoW versus PoS debate. While these two models dominate current discussions, innovative alternatives are emerging that could reshape how blockchain networks operate in the future.
Hybrid consensus models are gaining attention, combining elements of different mechanisms to balance security, efficiency, and decentralisation. Some networks use PoW for initial block creation and PoS for finalisation, attempting to capture the benefits of both systems while mitigating their individual weaknesses.
Proof of Authority (PoA) systems have found success in enterprise and consortium blockchains where participants are known and trusted. These systems sacrifice some decentralisation for dramatically improved performance and energy efficiency.
Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) represents another variation, where token holders vote for delegates who validate transactions on their behalf.
Emerging mechanisms like Proof of Space, Proof of Burn, and various forms of Proof of Activity are being explored for specific use cases. These alternatives aim to address particular limitations of existing systems or serve specialised applications.
The trend toward environmental sustainability is likely to continue driving innovation in consensus mechanisms. As regulatory pressure increases and institutional adoption grows, networks that can demonstrate minimal environmental impact while maintaining security will have significant advantages.
However, it's unlikely that PoS will completely replace PoW in the near future. Bitcoin's position as digital gold seems secure, and its PoW consensus mechanism is integral to its value proposition. Instead, we're likely to see continued specialisation, with different consensus mechanisms serving different purposes within the broader crypto ecosystem.
Conclusion
The PoW versus PoS debate isn't about declaring a winner, it's about recognising that each serves different purposes in the evolving crypto landscape. Many in the industry consider Bitcoin’s PoW to be a benchmark for security and decentralisation, while PoS networks are becoming the preferred choice for apps requiring speed, efficiency, and environmental sustainability.
Ethereum's successful transition to PoS proved that established networks can evolve without sacrificing security, validating PoS as a mature alternative. As the space develops, expect to see continued specialisation rather than replacement, with different consensus mechanisms optimised for specific use cases.
For investors and enthusiasts, understanding these mechanisms is essential for evaluating projects and predicting where the technology is headed. The consensus mechanism innovation continues to be one of blockchain's most dynamic frontiers.

Security tokens are digital representations of real-world assets like stocks, bonds, and real estate that live on the blockchain. Think of them as the bridge between Wall Street's traditional assets and crypto's 24/7, borderless trading potential.
And the momentum surrounding them is undeniable. While cryptocurrencies grab headlines with wild price swings and meme coins, security tokens have been quietly building the infrastructure for something much bigger: the complete digitisation of asset ownership.
We're talking about trillion-dollar markets getting tokenised, institutional investors finally getting comfortable with blockchain, and everyday people gaining access to investment opportunities that were previously reserved for the ultra-wealthy.
But let's keep it real - this isn't just another crypto hype cycle. Security tokens come with serious regulatory frameworks, compliance requirements, and technical complexities that separate them from the wild west of early crypto. They represent the maturation of blockchain technology, where innovation meets regulation in ways that actually make sense.
Here's what you need to know: Whether you're a financial professional trying to understand the next evolution of asset management or someone just getting started in crypto, security tokens are reshaping how we think about ownership and investment.
Let's dive into the complete landscape - from how these tokens actually work to why they might just be the bridge that brings blockchain technology into the mainstream financial world.
What is a security token?
A security token is essentially a digital certificate of ownership that represents a stake in real-world assets. Think stocks, bonds, real estate, commodities, or even fine art - all living on the blockchain with smart contracts handling the heavy lifting.
Instead of paper certificates or digital entries in traditional databases, these tokens exist on distributed ledgers that anyone can verify. It's like having a tamper-proof receipt for your ownership that the entire world can validate.
The magic happens when you realise what this means for accessibility. That $50 million commercial building in downtown Manhattan? With security tokens, you could own a piece of it for a few hundred bucks. The barriers that kept regular investors out of premium asset classes are crumbling.
Side note: the cybersecurity context
Before we go deeper, let's clear up some confusion. "Security token" also refers to those little devices or apps that generate authentication codes for logging into secure systems. While that's not our main focus here, we just wanted to clarify.
How do security tokens work?
The tokenisation process
Say you've got a real-world asset - a luxury apartment building worth $10 million. Traditional finance would require massive capital, complex legal structures, and exclusive access to invest. Security tokens flip that script entirely.
The building gets legally structured into a digital framework where ownership rights are represented by blockchain tokens. Each token represents a fractional ownership stake, complete with rights to rental income, appreciation, and voting on major decisions.
The transformation isn't just technical, it's fundamental. Assets that were once illiquid and exclusive become tradeable, divisible, and globally accessible. At the risk of sounding dramatic, we're talking about democratising investment opportunities that have been locked away for centuries.
Blockchain mechanisms & smart contracts
Smart contracts are the secret sauce that makes this whole system tick. These aren't just digital agreements - they're self-executing programs that automatically handle compliance, distributions, and transfers based on predetermined rules.
This would look like dividend payments happening automatically when profits hit your smart contract, or voting rights that activate based on your token holdings. No intermediaries, no manual processing, no waiting for someone else to make decisions. The blockchain handles it all with mathematical precision.
The transparency factor is massive, too. Every transaction, every ownership change, every compliance check is recorded on an immutable ledger. A public audit trail that never lies and never disappears.
Security tokens vs. cryptocurrencies
Here's where things get spicy - not all digital assets are created equal.
Purpose and regulation differences
Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum started as digital currencies or platforms for decentralised applications. They're designed to function independently of traditional financial systems, often with minimal regulatory oversight.
Security tokens play by completely different rules. They're subject to the same securities regulations as traditional stocks and bonds, which means SEC oversight, investor protections, and compliance requirements. This isn't the wild west - it's Wall Street with blockchain superpowers.
The regulatory framework actually becomes a feature, not a bug. For instance, Institutional investors who stayed away from crypto's volatility and regulatory uncertainty are jumping into security tokens because they recognise the legal structure and protections.
Common misconceptions
The biggest myth? That security tokens are just "boring crypto." Wrong. They're the bridge that brings trillion-dollar asset classes into the 24/7, globally accessible blockchain ecosystem.
Another misconception is that regulation kills innovation. In reality, clear regulatory frameworks are accelerating institutional adoption and creating the infrastructure for massive capital flows into tokenised assets.
Types of security tokens
Asset-backed security tokens
Equity tokens represent ownership stakes in companies, complete with voting rights and profit distributions. Instead of traditional shares, you hold blockchain tokens that prove your ownership and automatically handle shareholder benefits.
Real estate tokens are fracturing the property market in the best possible way. Commercial buildings, residential complexes, and even individual properties are getting tokenised, allowing investors to build diversified real estate portfolios with minimal capital requirements.
Debt tokens represent bonds and loan instruments, offering fixed income opportunities with blockchain's transparency and efficiency. Corporate bonds, government securities, and alternative lending products are all getting the tokenisation treatment.
Commodity tokens bring physical assets like gold, oil, and agricultural products into the digital realm, often backed by actual reserves and offering exposure without the complexities of physical ownership.
Utility versus security tokens
The distinction comes down to the Howey Test - a legal framework that determines whether something qualifies as a security. If you're buying a token primarily for investment returns based on others' efforts, it's likely a security token requiring regulatory compliance.
Utility tokens, on the other hand, are designed to provide access to specific services or platforms. Think of them as digital arcade tokens that unlock functionality rather than investment opportunities.
The lines blur sometimes, but the key difference is intent and structure. Security tokens are explicitly designed as investment vehicles with regulatory protections.
Side note: Physical security tokens (2FA)
Physical security tokens generate one-time passwords or cryptographic keys for secure system access. These range from USB devices to smartphone apps that create time-based authentication codes.
Benefits of security tokens
Fractional ownership breaks down barriers that have existed for centuries. Premium assets that required millions in capital are now accessible to regular investors. You can own pieces of multiple commercial properties, startup equity, and rare collectables with the same ease as buying stocks.
Global market access eliminates geographical restrictions and time zone limitations. Traditional markets close, but blockchain doesn't sleep. Your tokenised assets can trade 24/7 across global markets without the friction of traditional cross-border transactions.
Automation of compliance through smart contracts reduces costs and eliminates human error. Regulatory requirements, tax reporting, and investor protections get built into the token's code, creating compliance that scales automatically.
Liquidity transformation is perhaps the most revolutionary benefit. Assets that traditionally took months or years to sell can now trade instantly on secondary markets. Real estate, private equity, and fine art gain stock-like liquidity.
Cost efficiency removes layers of intermediaries and reduces transaction costs. No more armies of lawyers, brokers, and administrators for every transaction. Smart contracts handle the heavy lifting at a fraction of traditional costs.
Platforms like Polymesh are pushing these benefits even further with features like on-chain compliance engines and programmable permissions that make institutional adoption smoother and more secure.
Regulatory considerations
SEC and the Howey Test
The Securities and Exchange Commission uses the Howey Test to determine what qualifies as a security. The criteria are straightforward: investment of money in a common enterprise with the expectation of profits derived from others' efforts.
Most tokenised assets that represent ownership stakes or investment opportunities will qualify as securities, triggering registration requirements, disclosure obligations, and investor protection measures. This isn't a loophole-filled grey area - it's regulated financial territory.
The regulatory clarity actually accelerates adoption. Institutional investors and traditional financial firms know how to operate within securities regulations. Clear rules create confidence and capital flows.
Jurisdictional differences
The United States takes a securities-first approach, with the SEC actively regulating token offerings and secondary trading. The framework is comprehensive but creates predictable operating conditions for compliant projects.
The European Union has implemented the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, creating harmonised rules across member states. The approach balances innovation with investor protection, often providing clearer guidance than U.S. regulations.
Asia-Pacific markets show varying approaches, with Singapore and Switzerland leading in regulatory clarity while maintaining innovation-friendly environments. Each jurisdiction creates unique opportunities and compliance requirements.
Security Token Offerings (STOs)
STOs are essentially the grown-up version of ICOs, with legal structure and regulatory compliance baked in.
What is an STO?
A Security Token Offering functions like an Initial Public Offering but uses blockchain technology and tokenised securities instead of traditional shares. Companies raise capital by selling security tokens that represent equity, debt, or asset-backed instruments.
The process includes regulatory compliance from day one - securities registration, investor accreditation verification, disclosure requirements, and ongoing reporting obligations. It's the legitimate path for blockchain-based capital raising.
STOs attract institutional capital because they operate within familiar regulatory frameworks while providing blockchain's efficiency and transparency benefits.
Investing in STOs usually requires accredited investor status in most jurisdictions, though some offerings allow broader participation. Due diligence processes mirror traditional securities investments, with added technical considerations around blockchain infrastructure.
Real-world examples of security tokens
tZERO has tokenised equity in its own platform, creating a regulated marketplace for security token trading. Their approach demonstrates how traditional brokerage functions can operate on blockchain infrastructure.
Real estate tokenisation is exploding across multiple platforms. Properties in major cities worldwide are getting fractionalised, allowing investors to build geographically diversified real estate portfolios with minimal capital requirements.
The Polymesh ecosystem showcases institutional-grade security token infrastructure with built-in compliance, governance features, and identity management. Their projects span multiple asset classes and demonstrate enterprise adoption.
Tokenised traditional securities like bNVDA (representing NVIDIA stock exposure) show how existing public company shares can gain blockchain benefits while maintaining regulatory compliance.
Risks and challenges
Every revolutionary shift comes with growing pains, and security tokens are no exception. Here's what you need to navigate:
- Regulatory uncertainty - Despite improving clarity, rule changes, enforcement actions, and jurisdictional differences create ongoing compliance challenges for issuers and investors
- Market maturity - Limited secondary market liquidity, fewer service providers, and evolving best practices mean early participants face pioneer-phase risks
- Technology risks - Smart contract vulnerabilities, blockchain network issues, and custody challenges create unique security considerations at the intersection of traditional finance and bleeding-edge technology
- Token theft and fraud - Threats exist in both digital and physical contexts, making proper custody, security practices, and due diligence critical for protecting tokenised assets
Closing thoughts
Security tokens represent the maturation of blockchain technology beyond speculative trading into legitimate financial infrastructure. They're solving real problems - illiquidity, high barriers to entry, geographic restrictions, and inefficient intermediary systems that have plagued traditional finance for decades.
At this stage, the momentum surrounding security tokens suggests that security tokens will become a standard part of the financial landscape rather than a niche blockchain experiment. We're witnessing the early stages of a fundamental shift in how ownership and investment work.

From Bitcoin’s meteoric rise to the nonstop influx of new blockchain projects, digital currencies have captured the imagination (and wallets) of millions of people around the world. Crypto isn't just disrupting finance - it's rewriting the rules of money.
Unlike stocks or bonds that sleep when markets close, crypto never does. It’s borderless, always on, and untethered to any one country or institution, making it a magnet for those chasing new ways to diversify and bet on the future.
But it’s not all moonshots and memes. Volatility is real. Prices can rocket, or crash, within hours. And with rules still catching up, the landscape remains wild and unpredictable.
Here’s a guide to entering the market in 2025 - everything you need to know (and why it’s important). It’s not all high risk, high reward, so if you’re jumping in, make sure you know what’s going on.
What is cryptocurrency and how does it work?
Think of cryptocurrency as digital money that exists only online. Unlike the dollars in your bank account, which are controlled by banks and governments, cryptocurrencies run on networks of computers around the world.
The blockchain foundation
At its core, digital currency relies on something called blockchain technology. Imagine a ledger book that's copied across thousands of computers worldwide. Every time someone makes a transaction, it gets recorded in this ledger, and all the computers have to agree it's valid.
This system creates trust without needing a central authority like a bank: it's essentially having thousands of witnesses verify every transaction.
Types of cryptocurrency
There are plenty of different types of crypto on the market, each serving different purposes - from payment-focused currencies to utility tokens to memecoins.
Bitcoin (BTC) is the original and most well-known crypto, designed primarily as a decentralised digital alternative to traditional money. It's often referred to as "digital gold" due to its limited supply and store-of-value appeal.
Ethereum (ETH) introduced smart contracts (self-executing agreements), which opened the door to decentralised applications (dapps). This innovation gave rise to other development-focused platforms, like Solana (SOL) or Avalanche (AVAX), which power other smart contract ecosystems.
Then there are stablecoins, such as Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC), which are pegged to fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar. These aim to reduce volatility and are often used for trading, lending, or cross-border transfers.
Utility tokens, like Chainlink (LINK) or Uniswap (UNI), serve specific functions within a platform, such as paying for services or governance participation.
Meanwhile, security tokens represent ownership in real-world assets, like shares in a company or real estate. Examples include tZERO (TZROP), which offers tokenised equity in the tZERO platform, or INX (INX), a regulated token representing equity in the INX digital trading platform. These tokens are typically issued under securities regulations and grant holders rights like dividends or profit-sharing.
Lastly, memecoins (e.g., Dogecoin (DOGE) or Pepe (PEPE)) often start as jokes or community experiments but can gain traction through viral attention.
This is by no means a complete list, but it offers a sizable overview and a great place to start.
Crypto vs stocks
When you buy a stock, you’re purchasing a share of ownership in a company. That ownership may entitle you to dividends (a portion of the company’s profits), voting rights, and access to company reports. These stocks are regulated by financial authorities, like the SEC in the U.S., and the value of a stock typically reflects the company’s performance, market conditions, and investor sentiment.
By contrast, when you buy crypto, you’re acquiring a digital asset - not a stake in a company. Most cryptocurrencies don’t grant ownership rights, dividends, or governance over a legal entity (unless structured as security tokens). Their value is driven by a combination of factors, including:
- Supply and demand: Many coins have a limited supply (like Bitcoin), which can affect price.
- Utility: Tokens may serve a specific function within a blockchain ecosystem, such as paying for network fees, accessing services, or participating in governance.
- Market sentiment and adoption: Speculation, media attention, and global events often play a large role in price fluctuations.
Crypto markets are also 24/7 and borderless, unlike stock markets, which operate during fixed hours and are tied to specific jurisdictions.
Is cryptocurrency a good investment?
This question doesn't have a simple answer: the answer depends on your individual financial situation and risk tolerance. Let’s take a look at some of the potential benefits and risks.
Potential benefits
- Growth potential: Some cryptocurrencies have delivered extraordinary returns over the years
- Decentralisation: Not controlled by any single government or institution
- Accessibility: Markets operate 24/7, and you can start with small amounts
- Portfolio diversification: May behave differently from traditional assets
Significant risks
- Extreme volatility: Prices can dramatically drop in hours/days
- Regulatory uncertainty: Government actions can dramatically impact prices
- Security risks: Hacking, scams, and lost passwords can result in total loss
- Complexity: The technology can be difficult to understand
- Limited track record: Most cryptocurrencies haven't been around long enough to establish long-term patterns
If you're considering crypto as part of your broader financial strategy, it's worth consulting with a qualified advisor who understands digital assets.
Different ways to invest in cryptocurrency
The good news is that you don't have to buy a full Bitcoin to get exposure to the crypto market. Here are several approaches, each with different risk levels and complexity.
Buy crypto directly
This is the most straightforward approach - purchasing actual crypto through a regulated platform. Note that you can buy a fraction of a cryptocurrency, spending what you want instead of committing to buying a whole coin at market value (i.e. you can buy $100 worth of BTC as opposed to $100,000 for a full one).
What you need to buy crypto through Tap:
- Download the app
- Create and verify your account
- Load funds (bank transfer, debit cards accepted)
- Buy your chosen cryptocurrency
You can safely store your crypto in unique wallets created for you within the app. Utilising top security measures and fully regulated, Tap offers peace of mind alongside crypto endeavours.
Crypto ETFs and ETPs
Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) let you invest in crypto through your regular brokerage account, just like buying stocks.
Examples include:
- Bitcoin ETFs (like IBIT, FBTC)
- Ethereum ETFs
- Broad crypto market ETFs
Benefits:
- No need to manage wallets or private keys
- Familiar investment process
- Potential tax advantages
- Professional management
Drawbacks:
- Management fees
- No direct ownership of crypto
- May not perfectly track crypto prices
Crypto-related stocks
You can gain indirect exposure through companies heavily involved in the crypto space.
Examples include:
- Strategy (MSTR): Company that holds significant Bitcoin reserves
- Riot Platforms (RIOT): Bitcoin mining company
These stocks often move with crypto prices but aren't direct replacements for owning crypto.
Blockchain investment funds
Some mutual funds and ETFs focus on companies developing blockchain technology, providing broader exposure to the ecosystem beyond just cryptocurrencies.
Advanced options (futures and options)
Experienced investors might consider crypto futures or options, but these are complex instruments with significant risks and aren't suitable for beginners.
How to choose the right investment strategy
Your approach to crypto should align with your overall financial goals and risk tolerance.
Consider your goals
- Growth seeking: Looking for potentially high returns over time
- Speculation: Short-term trading (highest risk)
- Diversification: Adding a small crypto allocation to a traditional portfolio
- Learning: Starting small to understand the technology
Time horizon matters
Crypto markets can be extremely volatile in the short term. If you might need the money within a few years, the high volatility could be problematic. As with any investment, never risk more than you’re willing to lose.
Risk tolerance check
Some financial commentators say that because crypto can be so volatile, it's often kept as a small part of a larger investment portfolio, usually less than 10%. The right amount for you depends on your goals and how much risk you're comfortable taking.
Diversification within crypto
If you decide to invest in crypto, consider spreading your investment across different types rather than putting everything into one coin.
How to start investing in cryptocurrency: step-by-step
If you've decided to explore crypto investing, here's a systematic approach:
Step 1: Choose your platform
Research different exchanges and brokers. Look for:
- Strong security track record
- Good customer support
- Reasonable fees
- User-friendly interface
- Proper regulatory compliance
For the sake of this guide, we will continue by using Tap as an example.
Step 2: Set up security
- Create and verify your account
- Enable two-factor authentication (2FA)
- Use a strong, unique password
- Consider using a dedicated email for crypto accounts
Step 3: Do your research
Before buying any crypto, understand:
- What problem it aims to solve
- How it works
- Who's behind the project
- Its track record and community
Step 4: Make your first purchase
Some people start by purchasing small amounts as a way to learn about the ecosystem without overcommitting financially. On the note of beginners, well-established cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum tend to receive more attention because of their track record and broader adoption.
Step 5: Monitor and learn
Track your investment's performance, but avoid making decisions based on daily price movements. Use this time to continue learning about the technology and market.
Top mistakes to avoid when investing in crypto
FOMO investing
Fear of missing out can lead to buying at peak prices. Avoid making investment decisions based on hype or social media buzz.
Skipping research
Each crypto is different. Don't assume they're all the same or that past performance predicts future results.
Ignoring security
Using weak passwords, falling for phishing scams, or keeping large amounts on unsecured exchanges can lead to total loss. Be vigilant, check that the platform is regulated.
Misunderstanding costs
Crypto transactions often involve multiple fees - trading fees, network fees, and spread costs. These can add up quickly. Be sure to check the final transaction costs before confirming the trade so that you never get blindsided by hidden fees.
Tax neglect
Cryptocurrency is taxable in most jurisdictions. Be sure to know what the current rules are in your area, or consult a tax advisor who is clued up on cryptocurrencies. Keeping good records from the start is much easier than trying to reconstruct them later.
Is it safe to invest in cryptocurrency?
Safety in cryptocurrency investing involves multiple layers of consideration.
Platform security
Choose exchanges and brokers with strong security track records. Look for:
- Insurance on customer deposits
- Cold storage of customer funds
- Regular security audits
- Transparent communication about security practices
Personal security practices
- Never share your private keys or seed phrases
- Be wary of phishing attempts
- Use reputable wallets and software
- Keep software updated
Regulatory environment
The crypto regulatory landscape is still developing. Changes in government policy can significantly impact prices and accessibility. Stay informed and be aware.
Scam awareness
Be wary of anything that sounds too good to be true. Common cryptocurrency scams include:
- Fake exchanges or wallets
- Ponzi schemes promising guaranteed returns
- Social media manipulation
- Fake celebrity endorsements
Should I invest in crypto for retirement?
Some retirement account providers now offer crypto options, but this comes with additional considerations.
- Higher fees are common for crypto retirement accounts
- Limited cryptocurrency options compared to direct investing
- The extreme volatility may be inappropriate for retirement funds
- Regulatory changes could affect availability
So, should I invest in crypto?
Crypto markets can be volatile and unpredictable. While some early adopters have seen significant gains, many others have faced substantial losses. This isn’t a guaranteed path to wealth - it’s a volatile, evolving market that demands clarity and caution.
Before you dive in, make sure you:
- Understand the tech and the risks behind it
- Know your own limits (financially and emotionally)
- Start small - only with what you can afford to lose
- Diversify, don’t go all-in on any one asset
- Stay current: regulations shift fast, and ignorance isn’t bliss
This isn’t for everyone. Crypto’s wild swings and legal grey zones mean it’s best approached like any high-risk bet: informed, cautious, and never with more than you’re willing to lose.

Built on the idea that movement has value, SWEAT turns your daily steps into digital currency. Whether you’re heading to the coffee shop or chasing your dog around the park, this app quietly rewards you for staying active, a novel approach to merging fitness and crypto.
This revolutionary approach to fitness motivation is being called "Move-to-Earn" (M2E) technology. Built on the foundation of the popular Sweatcoin app, which has attracted over 120 million users worldwide, SWEAT transforms your daily steps into actual crypto that holds real-world value.
The concept is beautifully simple: the more you move, the more SWEAT tokens you can earn. But unlike traditional fitness apps that offer points or badges, SWEAT tokens can be traded, staked for additional rewards, or used to purchase real goods and services. It's part of the broader Sweat Economy – an ecosystem designed to make healthy living financially rewarding.
For the realists wondering how this is made possible, let’s get into it.
How does Sweat Token work?
The intriguing concept behind SWEAT lies in its seamless integration between physical activity and blockchain technology. Here's how the system operates:
Step Tracking and Verification
The Sweatcoin app uses your smartphone's built-in sensors or connected wearable devices to track your steps. Using sophisticated algorithms to verify that your movement is genuine, it distinguishes between actual walking and artificial movement like shaking your phone.
Minting SWEAT Tokens
Once your steps are verified, the app converts them into SWEAT tokens through a process called "minting." Initially, users could mint 1 SWEAT token for every 1,000 verified steps. However, this rate gradually decreases over time as part of the tokenomics design to maintain scarcity and value.
Blockchain Integration
SWEAT operates on the NEAR Protocol blockchain, known for its speed and low transaction fees. When you mint SWEAT tokens, they're automatically transferred to your Sweat Wallet – a built-in crypto wallet that makes managing your tokens straightforward, even for crypto beginners.
Unlike other Move-to-Earn platforms that demand expensive NFT purchases to get started, SWEAT is free to begin earning.
Sweat Token tokenomics explained
Let’s take a look at SWEAT’s launch and distribution, total supply structure, minting decay schedule and burning mechanisms. Understanding SWEAT's economic model helps evaluate its long-term potential:
SWEAT launched in September 2022 with no initial coin offering (ICO) or pre-sale. Instead, SWEAT were distributed 1:1 to pre-existing Sweatcoin users via a token generation event, with a total supply capped and a minting schedule that decays over time to ensure scarcity.
Initially, 1,000 steps yielded 1 SWEAT, but this rate has reduced (e.g. ~0.33 SWEAT after one year, with plans for further reductions).
And lastly, the ecosystem includes staking rewards that encourage holding tokens rather than immediate selling. Additionally, certain activities may burn tokens, removing them from circulation permanently.
Sweatcoin vs SWEAT
This distinction often confuses newcomers, so let's break it down clearly:
Sweatcoins are the original in-app currency that Sweatcoin users have been earning since 2016. These points exist only within the Sweatcoin app and can be spent in the app's marketplace on various products and experiences.
SWEAT tokens, launched in September 2022, are actual cryptocurrency that exists on the blockchain. They have real market value and can be traded on trading platforms, staked for rewards, or used across the broader Sweat Economy ecosystem.
Think of Sweatcoins as arcade tokens that only work in one specific arcade, while SWEAT tokens are like actual money that you can use anywhere that accepts them. Both currencies coexist - you can continue earning Sweatcoins for in-app purchases while simultaneously earning SWEAT tokens for broader crypto utility.
Real-world uses of SWEAT Tokens
Let’s explore SWEAT tokens use cases outside of the Sweat Economy ecosystem:
- Marketplace Purchases: The Sweat Economy marketplace offers real products and services that you can purchase directly with SWEAT tokens. From fitness equipment to wellness products, the marketplace continues expanding its offerings.
- Staking for Passive Income: You can stake your SWEAT tokens to earn additional rewards over time. This process involves locking up your tokens for a specified period in exchange for earning more SWEAT tokens as interest.
- Charitable Donations: The platform enables users to donate their SWEAT tokens to various charitable causes, adding a philanthropic dimension to one’s daily fitness routine.
- Gaming and NFTs: The Sweat Economy includes gaming elements and NFT collections that can be purchased or earned using SWEAT tokens, adding a gamefying element.
- Brand Partnerships: SWEAT tokens can be used with various fitness and wellness brands that have partnered with the Sweat Economy, expanding the utility beyond the core app.
How to earn SWEAT Tokens
Getting started with earning SWEAT is refreshingly simple:
- Download the Sweatcoin app from your device's app store and create an account. The app will guide you through connecting your step tracking permissions.
- Go about your daily activities - walking to work, taking the stairs, going for a jog, or any other movement that generates steps. The app runs in the background, automatically tracking your activity.
- Each day, you can mint SWEAT tokens based on your verified steps. The current rate varies due to the decay mechanism, but historically started at 1 SWEAT per 1,000 steps.
There are also several other ways to increase your SWEAT earning potential:
- Complete daily challenges and achievements
- Refer friends to join the platform
- Participate in special events and promotions
- Maintain consistent daily activity streaks
The platform implements daily minting limits to prevent abuse, but these limits can be increased through various engagement activities within the app.
Storing and managing your SWEAT Tokens
The easiest way to manage your SWEAT tokens is through the Sweat Wallet, automatically created when you start earning (no setup or technical know-how required). For those who prefer more control, SWEAT can also be stored in any NEAR-compatible wallet, like NEAR Wallet.
Whichever option you choose, security is key. Always enable two-factor authentication and never share your private keys or recovery phrases. While the Sweat Wallet includes built-in protections, staying vigilant is essential.
Where and How to Buy SWEAT Tokens
While earning through movement is the primary method, you can also purchase SWEAT tokens directly through centralised exchanges (CEX) and, for those comfortable with DeFi, on decentralised exchanges (DEX) within the NEAR ecosystem.
Always research exchanges thoroughly and start with small amounts if you're new to crypto trading.
To stay on the safe side, keep an eye on Tap - an announcement is coming that could put SWEAT firmly on your radar.
Is Sweat Token safe? Looking at security and privacy
Data privacy
Sweatcoin has built its reputation on user privacy. The app collects step data and location information necessary for verification, but has implemented strong privacy protections. Users maintain control over their data sharing preferences.
Fraud prevention
Be warned: the platform uses sophisticated anti-fraud mechanisms to prevent fake step generation. Machine learning algorithms analyse movement patterns to identify and prevent cheating attempts.
What data is collected vs shared
The app collects step counts, basic movement patterns, and location data for verification purposes. However, personal health data isn't shared with third parties without explicit consent, and users can opt out of data sharing for marketing purposes.
Blockchain security
Operating on the NEAR Protocol provides inherent security benefits through blockchain technology, including transparent transactions and decentralised validation.
M2E Movement: Sweat Token vs STEPN
Comparing SWEAT to STEPN, another popular Move-to-Earn platform, reveals important distinctions:
Entry Barriers
STEPN requires purchasing expensive NFT sneakers (often $500-2000) to begin earning, while SWEAT is completely free to start.
Token Utility
STEPN focuses heavily on NFT trading and upgrading, while SWEAT emphasises real-world utility through marketplace purchases and staking.
Monetisation Approach
STEPN operates more like a game with complex mechanics, while SWEAT maintains simplicity and accessibility for mainstream users.
The choice between platforms often comes down to whether you prefer high-barrier, high-reward gaming (STEPN) or low-barrier, steady-reward fitness motivation (SWEAT).
Pros and Cons of Sweat Token
Advantages
- Zero Entry Cost: No upfront investment required to start earning
- Health Benefits: Encourages genuine physical activity and wellness
- User-Friendly: Simple interface accessible to crypto newcomers
- Real Utility: Tokens have actual use cases beyond speculation
- Large User Base: Built on proven Sweatcoin platform with millions of users
- Established Partnerships: Growing ecosystem of brand partnerships
Potential Drawbacks
- Token Inflation: Continuous minting may pressure token value
- Earning Limits: Daily minting caps limit earning potential
- Market Volatility: Like all cryptocurrencies, SWEAT price can fluctuate significantly
- Sustainability Questions: Long-term viability depends on user retention and ecosystem growth
Conclusion
Sweat Token combines fitness and crypto by rewarding daily movement with digital currency, making it an accessible entry point into Web3. With no upfront cost and real-world utility through staking and marketplace rewards, it appeals to both fitness enthusiasts and crypto newcomers. Its long-term success will depend on user engagement and expanding utility, but its low barrier to entry and alignment with everyday habits give it strong growth potential.
Kickstart your financial journey
Ready to take the first step? Join forward-thinking traders and savvy money users. Unlock new possibilities and start your path to success today.
Get started