Some crypto companies are fully compliant, fully regulated, and still can't keep their bank accounts. Learn why the financial system is quietly freezing them out.
Keep reading
Why can't a fully compliant, regulated crypto business secure a bank account in 2025?
If you're operating in this space, you already know the answer. You've lived through it. You've submitted the documentation, walked through your AML procedures, and demonstrated your regulatory compliance… only to be rejected. Or worse still, waking up to find your existing account frozen, with no real explanation and no path forward.
This isn't about isolated cases or bad actors being weeded out. It's a pattern of systematic risk aversion that's creating real barriers to growth across the entire sector, and it's throttling one of the most significant financial innovations of our generation.
We're Tap, and we're building the infrastructure that traditional banks refuse to provide.
The Economics Behind the Blockade
Let's examine what's actually driving this exclusion, because it's rarely about the reasons banks cite publicly.
The European Banking Authority has explicitly warned against unwarranted de-risking, noting it causes "severe consequences" and financial exclusion of legitimate customers. Yet the practice continues, driven by two fundamental economic pressures that have nothing to do with your business's actual risk profile.
The compliance cost calculation
Financial crime compliance across EMEA costs organizations approximately $85 billion annually. For traditional banks, the math is simple: serving crypto businesses requires specialized expertise, enhanced monitoring, and ongoing due diligence. As a result, it's cheaper to reject the entire sector than to build the infrastructure needed to serve it properly.
The regulatory capital burden
New EU regulations impose a 1,250% risk weight on unbacked crypto assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. This isn't a compliance requirement; it's a capital penalty that makes crypto exposure commercially unviable for traditional institutions, regardless of the actual risk individual clients present.
In the UK, approximately 90% of crypto firm registration applications have been rejected or withdrawn, often citing inadequate AML controls. Whether those assessments are accurate or not, they've created the perfect justification for blanket rejection policies.
The result? Compliant businesses are being treated the same as bad actors; not because of what they've done, but because of the sector they're in.
The Real Cost of Financial Exclusion
Financial exclusion isn’t just an hiccup; it creates tangible operational barriers that ripple through every part of running a crypto business.
Firms that have secured MiCA authorization, built robust compliance programs, and met regulatory requirements can find themselves locked out of basic banking services. Essential fiat on-ramps and off-ramps remain inaccessible, slowing payments, limiting growth, and complicating cash flow management.
Individual cases illustrate the problem vividly as well. Accounts are closed because a business receives a payment from a regulated exchange. Others are dropped with vague references to “commercial decisions,” offering no substantive justification. Founders frequently struggle to separate personal and business finances, as both are considered too risky to serve.
The irony is striking. By refusing service to compliant businesses, traditional banks aren’t mitigating risk; they’re amplifying it. Forced to operate through less regulated channels, these legitimate firms face higher operational and compliance risks, slower transactions, and reduced investor confidence. Over time, this slows innovation, and raises the cost of doing business for firms that are legally and technically sound.
Debanking Beyond Europe: U.S. Crypto Firms Face Their Own Challenges
Limited access to banking services isn’t exclusive to Europe. Leading firms in the U.S. crypto industry have faced numerous challenges regarding the banking blockade. Alex Konanykhin, CEO of Unicoin, described repeated account closures by major banks such as Citi, JPMorgan, and Wells Fargo, noting that access was cut off without explanation. Unicoin’s experience echoes a broader sentiment among crypto executives who argue that traditional financial institutions remain wary of digital asset businesses despite recent policy shifts toward a more pro-innovation stance.
Jesse Powell, co-founder of Kraken, has also spoken out about being dropped by long-time banking partners, calling the practice “financial censorship in disguise.” Caitlin Long, founder of Custodia Bank, recounted how her institution was repeatedly denied services. Gemini founders Tyler Winklevoss and Cameron Winklevoss shared similar frustrations.
These experiences reveal a pattern many in the industry interpret as systemic risk aversion. Even in a market as large and mature as the United States, crypto-focused businesses continue to encounter obstacles in maintaining basic financial infrastructure. The issue became especially acute after the collapse of crypto-friendly banks such as Silvergate, Signature, and Moonstone; institutions that once served as key bridges between fiat and digital assets. Their exit left a gap few traditional players have been willing to fill.
Why Tap Exists
The crypto industry has reached an inflection point. Regulatory frameworks like MiCA are providing clarity. Institutional adoption is accelerating. The technology is proven and tested. But the fundamental infrastructure gap remains: access to business banking that actually works for digital asset businesses.
This is precisely why we built Tap for Business.
We provide business accounts with dedicated EUR and GBP IBANs specifically designed for crypto companies and businesses that interact with digital assets. This isn't a side offering or an experiment, it's our core focus.
Our approach is straightforward
We built our infrastructure for this sector
Rather than retrofitting traditional banking systems to reluctantly accommodate crypto businesses, we designed our compliance, monitoring, and operational frameworks specifically for digital asset flows. This means we can properly assess and serve businesses that others automatically reject.
We price in the actual risk, not the sector
Blanket rejection policies exist because they're cheap and simple. We take a different approach: evaluating each business based on their actual controls, compliance posture, and operational reality. It costs more, but it's the only way to serve this market properly.
We're committed to sector normalization
Every time a legitimate crypto business is forced to operate without proper banking infrastructure, it reinforces outdated stigmas. By providing professional financial services to compliant businesses, we're helping demonstrate what should be obvious: crypto companies can and should be served by the financial system.
It isn't about taking on risks that others won't. It's about properly evaluating risks that others refuse to understand.
Moving Forward
The industry is maturing. Regulatory clarity is emerging. Institutional adoption is accelerating. But you can't put your business on hold while traditional banks slowly catch up to reality.
That's not sustainable in the long run.
As a firm, you shouldn't have to beg for a bank account. You shouldn't have to downplay your crypto operations just to access basic financial services. And you certainly shouldn't have to accept that systematic exclusion with little to no explanation other than “It’s just how things are."
The crypto sector is building the future of finance. Your banking partner should believe in that future too. If you're ready to work with financial infrastructure built for your business, not in spite of it, here we are.
Talk today with one of our experts to understand how we can help your business access the banking infrastructure you need.
NEWS AND UPDATES

After a brutal October sell-off, crypto just staged one of its most dramatic comebacks yet. Here's what the market's resilience signals for what comes next.
The crypto market just pulled off one of its boldest recoveries in recent memory. What began as a violent sell-off on October 10 has given way to a surprisingly strong rebound. In this piece, we’ll dig into “The Great Recovery” of the crypto market, how Bitcoin’s resilience particularly stands out in this comeback, and what to expect next…
The Crash That Shook It All
On October 10, markets were rattled across the board. Bitcoin fell from around $122,000 down to near $109,000 in a matter of hours. Ethereum dropped into the $3,600 to $3,700 range. The sudden collapse triggered massive liquidations, nearly $19 billion across assets, with $16.7B in long positions wiped out.

That kind of forced selling, often magnified by leverage and thin liquidity, created a sharp vacuum. Some call it a “flash crash”; an overreaction to geopolitical news, margin stress, and cascading liquidations.
What’s remarkable, however, is how quickly the market recovered.
The Great Recovery: Scope and Speed
Within days, many major cryptocurrencies recouped large parts of their losses. Bitcoin climbed back above $115,000, and Ethereum surged more than 8%, reclaiming the $4,100 level and beyond. Altcoins like Cardano and Dogecoin led some of the strongest rebounds.

One narrative gaining traction is that this crash was not a structural breakdown but a “relief rally”, a market reset after overleveraged participants were squeezed out of positions. Analysts highlight that sell pressure has eased, sentiment is stabilizing, and capital is re-entering the market, all signs that the broader uptrend may still be intact.
“What we just saw was a massive emotional reset,” Head of Partnerships at Arctic Digital Justin d’Anethan said.

“I would have another, more positive take: seeing 10B worth of liquidation happen in a flash and pushing BTC prices down 15%+ in less than 24hrs to then see BTC recoup 10% to 110K is a testament to how far we've come and how massive and important BTC has become,” he posted on 𝕏.
Moreover, an important datapoint stands out. Exchange inflows to BTC have shrunk, signaling that fewer holders are moving coins to exchanges for sale. This signals that fewer investors are transferring their Bitcoin from personal wallets to exchanges, which is a common precursor to selling. In layman terms, coins are being held rather than prepared for trade.

Bitcoin’s Backbone: Resilience Under Pressure
Bitcoin’s ability to rebound after extreme volatility has long been one of its defining traits. Friday’s drop admittedly sent shockwaves through the market, triggering billions in liquidations and exposing the fragility of leveraged trading.
Yet, as history has shown, such sharp pullbacks are far from new for the world’s largest cryptocurrency. In its short history, Bitcoin has endured dozens of drawdowns exceeding 10% in a single day (from the infamous “COVID crash” of 2020 to the FTX collapse in 2022) only to recover and set new highs months later.

This latest event, while painful, highlights a maturing market structure. Since the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in early 2024, institutional involvement has deepened, creating greater liquidity buffers and stronger institutional confidence. Even as billions in leveraged positions were wiped out, Bitcoin has held firm around the $110,000 zone, a level that has since acted as psychological support.
What to Watch Next
The key question now is whether this rebound marks a short-term relief rally or the start of a renewed uptrend. Analysts are closely watching derivatives funding rates, on-chain flows, and ETF inflows for clues. A sustained increase in ETF demand could provide a steady bid under the market, offsetting the effects of future liquidation cascades. Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s ability to hold above $110,000 (an area of heavy trading volume) may serve as confirmation that investor confidence remains intact.
As the market digests the events of October 10, one lesson stands out. Bitcoin’s recovery isn’t just a matter of luck, it’s a reflection of underlying market structure that can absorb shocks. It is built on a growing base of long-term holders, institutional adoption, and a financial system increasingly intertwined with digital assets. Corrections, however dramatic, are not signs of weakness; they are reminders of a maturing market that is striding towards equilibrium.
Bottom Line
The crash on October 10 was brutal, there’s no denying that. It was one of the deepest and fastest in recent memory. But the recovery has been equally sharp. Rather than exposing faults, the rebound has underscored the market’s adaptability and Bitcoin’s central role.
The market consensus is seemingly leaning towards a reset; not a reversal. The shakeout purged excess leverage, and the comeback underlined demand. If Bitcoin can maintain that strength, and the broader market keeps its footing in the coming days, this could mark a turning point rather than a cave-in.

What's driving the crypto market this week? Get fast, clear updates on the top coins, market trends, and regulation news.
Welcome to Tap’s weekly crypto market recap.
Here are the biggest stories from last week (8 - 14 July).
💥 Bitcoin breaks new ATH
Bitcoin officially hit above $122,000 marking its first record since May and pushing total 2025 gains to around +20% YTD. The rally was driven by heavy inflows into U.S. spot ETFs, over $218m into BTC and $211m into ETH in a single day, while nearly all top 100 coins turned green.
📌 Trump Media files for “Crypto Blue‑Chip ETF”
Trump Media & Technology Group has submitted an S‑1 to the SEC for a new “Crypto Blue Chip ETF” focused primarily on BTC (70%), ETH (15%), SOL (8%), XRP (5%), and CRO (2%), marking its third crypto ETF push this year.
A major political/media player launching a multi-asset crypto fund signals growing mainstream and institutional acceptance, and sparks fresh conflict-of-interest questions. We’ll keep you updated.
🌍 Pakistan launches CBDC pilot & virtual‑asset regulation
The State Bank of Pakistan has initiated a pilot for a central bank digital currency and is finalising virtual-asset laws, with Binance CEO CZ advising government efforts. With inflation at just 3.2% and rising foreign reserves (~$14.5b), Pakistan is embracing fintech ahead of emerging-market peers like India.
🛫 Emirates Airline to accept crypto payments
Dubai’s Emirates signed a preliminary partnership with Crypto.com to enable crypto payments starting in 2026, deepening the Gulf’s commitment to crypto-friendly infrastructure.
*Not to take away from the adoption excitement, but you can book Emirates flights with your Tap card, using whichever crypto you like.
🏛️ U.S. declares next week “Crypto Week”
House Republicans have designated 14-18 July as “Crypto Week,” aiming for votes on GENIUS (stablecoin oversight), CLARITY (jurisdiction clarity), and Anti‑CBDC bills. The idea is that these bills could reshape how U.S. defines crypto regulation and limit federal CBDC initiatives under Trump-aligned priorities.
Stay tuned for next week’s instalment, delivered on Monday mornings.

Explore key catalysts driving the modern money revolution. Learn about digital currencies, fintech innovation, and the future of finance.
The financial world is undergoing a significant transformation, largely driven by Millennials and Gen Z. These digital-native generations are embracing cryptocurrencies at an unprecedented rate, challenging traditional financial systems and catalysing a shift toward new forms of digital finance, redefining how we perceive and interact with money.
This movement is not just a fleeting trend but a fundamental change that is redefining how we perceive and interact with money.
Digital Natives Leading the Way
Growing up in the digital age, Millennials (born 1981-1996) and Gen Z (born 1997-2012) are inherently comfortable with technology. This familiarity extends to their financial behaviours, with a noticeable inclination toward adopting innovative solutions like cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology.
According to the Grayscale Investments and Harris Poll Report which studied Americans, 44% agree that “crypto and blockchain technology are the future of finance.” Looking more closely at the demographics, Millenials and Gen Z’s expressed the highest levels of enthusiasm, underscoring the pivotal role younger generations play in driving cryptocurrency adoption.
Desire for Financial Empowerment and Inclusion
Economic challenges such as the 2008 financial crisis and the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have shaped these generations' perspectives on traditional finance. There's a growing scepticism toward conventional financial institutions and a desire for greater control over personal finances.
The Grayscale-Harris Poll found that 23% of those surveyed believe that cryptocurrencies are a long-term investment, up from 19% the previous year. The report also found that 41% of participants are currently paying more attention to Bitcoin and other crypto assets because of geopolitical tensions, inflation, and a weakening US dollar (up from 34%).
This sentiment fuels engagement with cryptocurrencies as viable investment assets and tools for financial empowerment.
Influence on Market Dynamics
The collective financial influence of Millennials and Gen Z is significant. Their active participation in cryptocurrency markets contributes to increased liquidity and shapes market trends. Social media platforms like Reddit, Twitter, and TikTok have become pivotal in disseminating information and investment strategies among these generations.
The rise of cryptocurrencies like Dogecoin and Shiba Inu demonstrates how younger investors leverage online communities to impact financial markets2. This phenomenon shows their ability to mobilise and drive market movements, challenging traditional investment paradigms.
Embracing Innovation and Technological Advancement
Cryptocurrencies represent more than just investment opportunities; they embody technological innovation that resonates with Millennials and Gen Z. Blockchain technology and digital assets are areas where these generations are not only users but also contributors.
A 2021 survey by Pew Research Center indicated that 31% of Americans aged 18-29 have invested in, traded, or used cryptocurrency, compared to just 8% of those aged 50-64. This significant disparity highlights the generational embrace of digital assets and the technologies underpinning them.
Impact on Traditional Financial Institutions
The shift toward cryptocurrencies is prompting traditional financial institutions to adapt. Banks, investment firms, and payment platforms are increasingly integrating crypto services to meet the evolving demands of younger clients.
Companies like PayPal and Square have expanded their cryptocurrency offerings, allowing users to buy, hold, and sell cryptocurrencies directly from their platforms. These developments signify the financial industry's recognition of the growing importance of cryptocurrencies.
Challenges and Considerations
While enthusiasm is high, challenges such as regulatory uncertainties, security concerns, and market volatility remain. However, Millennials and Gen Z appear willing to navigate these risks, drawn by the potential rewards and alignment with their values of innovation and financial autonomy.
In summary
Millennials and Gen Z are redefining the financial landscape, with their embrace of cryptocurrencies serving as a catalyst for broader change. This isn't just about alternative investments; it's a shift in how younger generations view financial systems and their place within them. Their drive for autonomy, transparency, and technological integration is pushing traditional institutions to innovate rapidly.
This generational influence extends beyond personal finance, potentially reshaping global economic structures. For industry players, from established banks to fintech startups, adapting to these changing preferences isn't just advantageous—it's essential for long-term viability.
As cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology mature, we're likely to see further transformations in how society interacts with money. Those who can navigate this evolving landscape, balancing innovation with stability, will be well-positioned for the future of finance. It's a complex shift, but one that offers exciting possibilities for a more inclusive and technologically advanced financial ecosystem. The financial world is changing, and it's the young guns who are calling the shots.
Unveiling the future of money: Explore the game-changing Central Bank Digital Currencies and their potential impact on finance.
Since the debut of Bitcoin in 2009, central banks have been living in fear of the disruptive technology that is cryptocurrency. Distributed ledger technology has revolutionized the digital world and has continued to challenge the corruption of central bank morals.
Financial institutions can’t beat or control cryptocurrency, so they are joining them in creating digital currencies. Governments have now been embracing digital currencies in the form of CBDCs, otherwise known as central bank digital currencies.
Central bank digital currencies are digital tokens, similar to cryptocurrency, issued by a central bank. They are pegged to the value of that country's fiat currency, acting as a digital currency version of the national currency. CBDCs are created and regulated by a country's central bank and monetary authorities.
A central bank digital currency is generally created for a sense of financial inclusion and to improve the application of monetary and fiscal policy. Central banks adopting currency in digital form presents great benefits for the federal reserve system as well as citizens, but there are some cons lurking behind the central bank digital currency facade.
Types of central bank digital currencies
While the concept of a central bank digital currency is quite easy to understand, there are layers to central bank money in its digital form. Before we take a deep dive into the possibilities presented by the central banks and their digital money, we will break down the different types of central bank digital currencies.
Wholesale CBDCs
Wholesale central bank digital currencies are targeted at financial institutions, whereby reserve balances are held within a central bank. This integration assists the financial system and institutions in improving payment systems and security payment efficiency.
This is much simpler than rolling out a central bank digital currency to the whole country but provides support for large businesses when they want to transfer money. These digital payments would also act as a digital ledger and aid in the avoidance of money laundering.
Retail CBDCs
A retail central bank digital currency refers to government-backed digital assets used between businesses and customers. This type of central bank digital currency is aimed at traditional currency, acting as a digital version of physical currency. These digital assets would allow retail payment systems, direct P2P CBDC transactions, as well as international settlements among businesses. It would be similar to having a bank account, where you could digitally transfer money through commercial banks, except the currency would be in the form of a digital yuan or euro, rather than the federal reserve of currency held by central banks.
Pros and cons of a central bank digital currency (CBDC)
Central banks are looking for ways to keep their money in the country, as opposed to it being spent on buying cryptocurrencies, thus losing it to a global market. As digital currencies become more popular, each central bank must decide whether they want to fight it or profit from the potential. Regardless of adoption, central banks creating their own digital currencies comes with benefits and disadvantages to users that you need to know.
Pros of central bank digital currency (CBDC)
- Cross border payments
- Track money laundering activity
- Secure international monetary fund
- Reduces risk of commercial bank collapse
- Cheaper
- More secure
- Promotes financial inclusion
Cons of central bank digital currency (CDBC)
- Central banks have complete control
- No anonymity of digital currency transfers
- Cybersecurity issues
- Price reliant on fiat currency equivalent
- Physical money may be eliminated
- Ban of distributed ledger technology and cryptocurrency
Central bank digital currency conclusion
Central bank money in an electronic form has been a big debate in the blockchain technology space, with so many countries considering the possibility. The European Central Bank, as well as other central banks, have been considering the possibility of central bank digital currencies as a means of improving the financial system. The Chinese government is in the midst of testing out their e-CNY, which some are calling the digital yuan. They have seen great success so far, but only after completely banning Bitcoin trading.
There is a lot of good that can come from CBDCs, but the benefits are mostly for the federal reserve system and central banks. Bank-account holders and citizens may have their privacy compromised and their investment options limited if the world adopts CBDCs.
It's important to remember that central bank digital currencies are not cryptocurrencies. They do not compete with cryptocurrencies and the benefits of blockchain technology. Their limited use cases can only be applied when reinforced by a financial system authority. Only time will tell if CBDCs will succeed, but right now you can appreciate the advantages brought to you by crypto.

You might have heard of the "Travel Rule" before, but do you know what it actually mean? Let us dive into it for you.
What is the "Travel Rule"?
You might have heard of the "Travel Rule" before, but do you know what it actually mean? Well, let me break it down for you. The Travel Rule, also known as FATF Recommendation 16, is a set of measures aimed at combating money laundering and terrorism financing through financial transactions.
So, why is it called the Travel Rule? It's because the personal data of the transacting parties "travels" with the transfers, making it easier for authorities to monitor and regulate these transactions. See, now it all makes sense!
The Travel Rule applies to financial institutions engaged in virtual asset transfers and crypto companies, collectively referred to as virtual asset service providers (VASPs). These VASPs have to obtain and share "required and accurate originator information and required beneficiary information" with counterparty VASPs or financial institutions during or before the transaction.
To make things more practical, the FATF recommends that countries adopt a de minimis threshold of 1,000 USD/EUR for virtual asset transfers. This means that transactions below this threshold would have fewer requirements compared to those exceeding it.
For transfers of Virtual Assets falling below the de minimis threshold, Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) are required to gather:
- The identities of the sender (originator) and receiver (beneficiary).
- Either the wallet address associated with each transaction involving Virtual Assets (VAs) or a unique reference number assigned to the transaction.
- Verification of this gathered data is not obligatory, unless any suspicious circumstances concerning money laundering or terrorism financing arise. In such instances, it becomes essential to verify customer information.
Conversely, for transfers surpassing the de minimis threshold, VASPs are obligated to collect more extensive particulars, encompassing:
- Full name of the sender (originator).
- The account number employed by the sender (originator) for processing the transaction, such as a wallet address.
- The physical (geographical) address of the sender (originator), national identity number, a customer identification number that uniquely distinguishes the sender to the ordering institution, or details like date and place of birth.
- Name of the receiver (beneficiary).
- Account number of the receiver (beneficiary) utilized for transaction processing, similar to a wallet address.
By following these guidelines, virtual asset service providers can contribute to a safer and more transparent virtual asset ecosystem while complying with international regulations on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism. It's all about ensuring the integrity of financial transactions and safeguarding against illicit activities.
Implementation of the Travel Rule in the United Kingdom
A notable shift is anticipated in the United Kingdom's oversight of the virtual asset sector, commencing September 1, 2023.
This seminal development comes in the form of the Travel Rule, which falls under Part 7A of the Money Laundering Regulations 2017. Designed to combat money laundering and terrorist financing within the virtual asset industry, this new regulation expands the information-sharing requirements for wire transfers to encompass virtual asset transfers.
The HM Treasury of the UK has meticulously customized the provisions of the revised Wire Transfer Regulations to cater to the unique demands of the virtual asset sector. This underscores the government's unwavering commitment to fostering a secure and transparent financial ecosystem. Concurrently, it signals their resolve to enable the virtual asset industry to flourish.
The Travel Rule itself originates from the updated version of the Financial Action Task Force's recommendation on information-sharing requirements for wire transfers. By extending these recommendations to cover virtual asset transfers, the UK aspires to significantly mitigate the risk of illicit activities within the sector.
Undoubtedly, the Travel Rule heralds a landmark stride forward in regulating the virtual asset industry in the UK. By extending the ambit of information-sharing requirements and fortifying oversight over virtual asset firms
Implementation of the Travel Rule in the European Union
Prepare yourself, as a new regulation called the Travel Rule is set to be introduced in the world of virtual assets within the European Union. Effective from December 30, 2024, this rule will take effect precisely 18 months after the initial enforcement of the Transfer of Funds Regulation.
Let's delve into the details of the Travel Rule. When it comes to information requirements, there will be no distinction made between cross-border transfers and transfers within the EU. The revised Transfer of Funds regulation recognizes all virtual asset transfers as cross-border, acknowledging the borderless nature and global reach of such transactions and services.
Now, let's discuss compliance obligations. To ensure adherence to these regulations, European Crypto Asset Service Providers (CASPs) must comply with certain measures. For transactions exceeding 1,000 EUR with self-hosted wallets, CASPs are obligated to collect crucial originator and beneficiary information. Additionally, CASPs are required to fulfill additional wallet verification obligations.
The implementation of these measures within the European Union aims to enhance transparency and mitigate potential risks associated with virtual asset transfers. For individuals involved in this domain, it is of utmost importance to stay informed and adhere to these new guidelines in order to ensure compliance.
What does the travel rules means to me as user?
As a user in the virtual asset industry, the implementation of the Travel Rule brings some significant changes that are designed to enhance the security and transparency of financial transactions. This means that when you engage in virtual asset transfers, certain personal information will now be shared between the involved parties. While this might sound intrusive at first, it plays a crucial role in combating fraud, money laundering, and terrorist financing.
The Travel Rule aims to create a safer environment for individuals like you by reducing the risks associated with illicit activities. This means that you can have greater confidence in the legitimacy of the virtual asset transactions you engage in. The regulation aims to weed out illicit activities and promote a level playing field for legitimate users. This fosters trust and confidence among users, attracting more participants and further driving the growth and development of the industry.
However, it's important to note that complying with this rule may require you to provide additional information to virtual asset service providers. Your privacy and the protection of your personal data remain paramount, and service providers are bound by strict regulations to ensure the security of your information.
In summary, the Travel Rule is a positive development for digital asset users like yourself, as it contributes to a more secure and trustworthy virtual asset industry.
Unlocking Compliance and Seamless Experiences: Tap's Proactive Approach to Upcoming Regulations
Tap is fully committed to upholding regulatory compliance, while also prioritizing a seamless and enjoyable customer experience. In order to achieve this delicate balance, Tap has proactively sought out partnerships with trusted solution providers and is actively engaged in industry working groups. By collaborating with experts in the field, Tap ensures it remains on the cutting edge of best practices and innovative solutions.
These efforts not only demonstrate Tap's dedication to compliance, but also contribute to creating a secure and transparent environment for its users. By staying ahead of the curve, Tap can foster trust and confidence in the cryptocurrency ecosystem, reassuring customers that their financial transactions are safe and protected.
But Tap's commitment to compliance doesn't mean sacrificing user experience. On the contrary, Tap understands the importance of providing a seamless journey for its customers. This means that while regulatory requirements may be changing, Tap is working diligently to ensure that users can continue to enjoy a smooth and hassle-free experience.
By combining a proactive approach to compliance with a determination to maintain user satisfaction, Tap is setting itself apart as a trusted leader in the financial technology industry. So rest assured, as Tap evolves in response to new regulations, your experience as a customer will remain top-notch and worry-free.
LATEST ARTICLE

From Comedy Gold to Digital Ghost Town
Memecoins were once the beating heart of retail-driven speculation in cryptocurrency markets. From Dogecoin's Elon Musk-fueled rallies to the lightning-fast ascent of tokens like Shiba Inu and Pepe, these internet-born digital assets transformed online jokes into substantial market capitalizations, at least for those who managed to time the hype cycles correctly. But moving into late 2025, the atmosphere has shifted dramatically. Prices have experienced significant declines, trading liquidity has diminished considerably, and the frenzied enthusiasm that characterized previous market cycles appears to be a distant memory.
The question facing the cryptocurrency community now is whether memecoins represent a fading trend from the previous bull market, or whether they still retain potential for unexpected resurgence, like many internet phenomena before them.
When Chaos Became Currency: The Memecoin Genesis
The emergence of memecoins remains inseparable from broader internet culture and social media dynamics. Unlike Bitcoin or Ethereum, which originated from detailed technical documentation and comprehensive visions for decentralized finance, memecoins typically began as internet humor, sustained by community engagement, viral content, and grassroots enthusiasm.
Dogecoin, widely recognized as the original memecoin, launched in 2013 as a deliberate parody of cryptocurrency speculation. Despite its humorous origins, it eventually achieved a multi-billion-dollar market capitalization through sustained community support and high-profile endorsements by the likes of Elon Musk. This success established a template that numerous subsequent projects attempted to replicate, often promising rapid returns without substantial underlying fundamentals.
During the market cycles of 2021 and 2024, memecoins transcended their status as mere digital assets to become cultural phenomena. Social media platforms amplified hype cycles exponentially, and retail traders participated en masse, with some small initial positions growing into substantial returns. However, as with most speculative market movements, the inevitable correction followed the euphoric peaks.
The Great Memecoin Correction of 2025
Since the speculative peaks of late 2024, memecoin markets have experienced sustained downward pressure. Market capitalizations that previously reached tens of billions of dollars have retraced by 60-90% across the sector. Data from CoinMarketCap indicates that aggregate memecoin market capitalization has declined from over $120 billion in December 2024 to just under $70 billion as of the time of writing, with many individual tokens experiencing severe liquidity constraints.

This market correction has highlighted the fundamental challenge facing the memecoin sector: without strong technological foundations or clear utility cases, these assets depend almost entirely on viral attention and consistent liquidity inflows. When these supporting factors diminish, price performance typically follows suit.
Many retail participants who entered positions near market peaks now hold assets that may not recover their previous valuations, and the collective market enthusiasm that previously drove exponential price increases has largely dissipated.
It Was Funnier the First Time Around: Why Most Memes Don't Make It
One primary factor contributing to memecoin market instability is what market analysts describe as the flash flood phenomenon. Cryptocurrency hype cycles don't typically develop gradually. They tend to surge rapidly and intensively, overwhelming normal market dynamics. However, this attention often disappears just as quickly, leaving limited lasting impact.
This dynamic creates a predictable pattern that most memecoins follow:
- Viral launch accompanied by community-driven price appreciation
- Explosive price movement that attracts new buyers
- Rapid attention fatigue as focus shifts to newer projects
- Market collapse within weeks or months
Some Memes Never Get Old: What Separates Winners from Losers
What distinguishes long-term survivors like Dogecoin and Shiba Inu, which maintain ongoing recognition, from the thousands of forgotten tokens? Market analysts describe this as the authority gap: the difference between temporary viral attention and sustained market credibility.
Successful memecoins typically manage to establish cultural relevance or practical utility that extends beyond initial market mania. Dogecoin has maintained its position as an internet cultural staple with a dedicated holder base and continued mainstream references. Shiba Inu expanded its ecosystem to include staking mechanisms and decentralized applications, positioning itself closer to legitimate alternative cryptocurrencies.
Without these elements, even the most viral initial launches tend to fade into market obscurity. The underlying meme concept alone appears insufficient for long-term sustainability, projects must develop narratives that communities and market participants can support even after speculative excitement subsides.
Could Lightning Strike Twice?
Despite current market pessimism, not everyone believes memecoins have reached their final conclusion. Market observers like Darkfost suggest that memecoin dominance within the broader alternative cryptocurrency market is approaching levels historically associated with trend reversals.
The memecoin dominance ratio, which compares memecoin market capitalization to other alternative cryptocurrencies, has been trending near technical support levels that previously marked significant turning points. If speculative capital rotates back toward high-risk digital assets, which is a common occurrence during liquidity-driven bull markets, memecoins could potentially experience another explosive growth phase.
The underlying logic remains straightforward: speculative capital typically seeks volatility opportunities, and few digital asset categories provide volatility comparable to memecoins. For market participants willing to accept associated risks, the possibility of disproportionate returns continues to exist.
The Many Pitfalls of Memeland: The Risks Never Go Away
Even assuming a potential market rebound, memecoins remain among the highest-risk positions within cryptocurrency markets. Unlike Bitcoin, which has established scarcity characteristics, or Ethereum, which powers decentralized application ecosystems, most memecoins lack intrinsic utility propositions. Their market value remains almost entirely dependent on narrative and sentiment factors.
This dynamic means that timing becomes critically important. Market participants who enter positions early and exit strategically can potentially achieve remarkable returns. However, hesitation often converts profitable positions into losses, as exponential rallies frequently reverse with minimal advance warning.
For newcomers to this market segment, the implications are clear: memecoins may provide entertainment and occasional opportunities, but they should not constitute foundational portfolio elements. Effective risk management practices, and the willingness to accept complete capital loss, remain essential when stepping into Memeland.
Curtain Call or Just Intermission?
So has the meme coin era truly concluded? The answer isn’t simple. Examining the thousands of failed token projects, the sector certainly resembles a digital graveyard. Most projects were never designed for long-term sustainability, and their decline represents the natural consequence of speculative excess.
Yet historical patterns suggest caution in declaring memecoins permanently finished. Their cyclical nature, driven by internet culture and speculative market dynamics, indicates they often resurface when liquidity conditions and risk appetite shift favorably. Whether through traditional meme-based narratives or emerging AI-enhanced strategies, future market cycles could still produce unexpected developments.
For market participants, the key takeaway remains consistent: memecoins are not traditional financial assets. They represent speculative instruments capable of both extraordinary gains and losses. The underlying joke isn’t over… but anyone who’s still in on the joke should remain prepared for the punchline.

Managing payments across borders remains one of the biggest operational challenges for expanding businesses. While digital transformation has touched nearly every aspect of commerce, international banking is currently lagging behind with separate systems for crypto and traditional currency transactions, creating unnecessary complexity.
Tap solves this problem by offering each business a multi-currency account with a dedicated IBAN that functions as a bridge between these two financial worlds. For businesses handling both crypto and fiat currencies, this means one unified system rather than juggling multiple accounts and conversion processes. This isn't just convenient - it directly impacts your bottom line by reducing transaction fees, speeding up settlements, and simplifying reconciliation.
If you're handling international payments or considering crypto adoption, this could significantly streamline your financial operations. Here's what you need to know.
What is a business IBAN?
An IBAN (International Bank Account Number) serves as your business's financial passport - a standardised identifier recognised across 78+ countries. Unlike traditional account numbers, a Business IBAN follows a structured format that includes country codes, bank identifiers, and your unique account number.
What sets Tap's approach apart is the integration of this established banking standard with crypto functionality. Instead of operating in parallel financial universes, your transactions (whether in euros, dollars, or Bitcoin) flow through a single identifiable channel.
For finance teams, this means the end of reconciliation nightmares. For your customers and partners, it means one consistent payment destination regardless of their preferred currency.
How Business IBANs Work
The mechanics behind modern business transactions
A Business IBAN functions as the digital coordinates for your company's financial location in the global banking ecosystem. When properly implemented, it creates a frictionless path for money to flow into and out of your business regardless of currency type or originating country.
Sending and receiving payments
When receiving payments, your Business IBAN acts as a universal identifier that works across different payment systems. Clients simply enter your IBAN (and sometimes BIC code) into their banking platform, eliminating the confusion of different account number formats across countries.
For outgoing payments, the process works in reverse. You provide the recipient's IBAN, specify the amount, and Tap's platform handles the routing complexities behind the scenes. This standardisation prevents the common errors that lead to payment delays and rejection fees.
What separates Tap's system from conventional banking is the integration layer that works with both crypto and traditional currencies. When a client pays in Bitcoin, for example, you can choose to receive it as cryptocurrency or have it automatically converted to your preferred fiat currency before it reaches your account.
Banking networks demystified
Business IBANs interact with several key payment networks:
SEPA (Single Euro Payments Area): Covering 36 European countries, SEPA processes euro-denominated transfers typically within one business day at low fixed costs. Your Business IBAN automatically routes euro payments through this network without requiring a separate setup.
SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication): The backbone of international banking, SWIFT connects over 11,000 financial institutions worldwide.
Real-world transaction example
Consider a UK-based e-commerce business receiving payment from a German customer:
- The customer initiates a €5,000 payment to the merchant's business IBAN
- The transaction enters the SEPA network and arrives in the merchant's Tap account within hours
- The merchant can either keep the funds in euros or convert to GBP at their preferred timing
- If choosing to convert, Tap executes the exchange at market rates with minimal spread
- The funds become available for business operations, supplier payments, or withdrawal
This same process that once required multiple accounts, banking relationships, and days of processing now happens automatically through a single business IBAN. For businesses managing dozens or hundreds of such transactions monthly, the efficiency gains and cost savings compound significantly.
The ability to handle these complex financial pathways through one unified system represents the core value proposition of modern business IBANs - simplicity on the surface, sophisticated routing underneath.
Cross-border advantages that impact your bottom line
The practical benefits of a business IBAN become immediately apparent in cross-border transactions:
- Reduced rejection rates: correctly formatted IBANs virtually eliminate payment failures due to incorrect account details
- Faster settlement times: direct routing through the SEPA network for European transactions
- Lower transaction costs: fewer intermediaries means fewer fees eating into your margins
- Simplified compliance: clearer transaction trails for more straightforward reporting
Bridging crypto and traditional finance
The crypto market now represents a $2 trillion opportunity that many businesses struggle to tap into due to technical and operational barriers. A business account with Tap eliminates these obstacles by providing:
- Seamless conversion between crypto and fiat currencies
- Consolidated financial reporting across all currency types
- Regulatory compliance built into the platform
- Reduced exposure to crypto volatility through instant conversion options
For businesses cautiously exploring crypto acceptance, this hybrid approach offers a low-risk entry point without requiring major infrastructure changes.
Implementation without disruption
Setting up a business account through Tap requires minimal operational changes:
- Fill in the contact form to initiate a callback
- Complete the business account set-up and verification process
- Receive your unique account with IBAN
- Update payment details with clients and suppliers
- Integrate with your existing accounting systems
The entire process typically takes less than 48 hours, with Tap's team handling the technical heavy lifting.
Is a Tap business account right for your growth strategy?
It's worth considering a business account if your company:
- Operates in multiple countries or currencies
- Needs to reduce payment processing costs
- Wants to accept crypto payments without complexity
- Are looking to streamline financial operations
As payment landscapes continue evolving, businesses that implement flexible, future-proof solutions gain a significant competitive advantage in customer experience and operational efficiency.
Explore how a business IBAN could fit into your financial infrastructure by visiting Tap's business solutions page, from where a dedicated account manager can discuss potential savings based on your specific transaction patterns.
The business world won't wait for outdated payment systems to catch up. The question isn't whether you need more efficient payment solutions - it's how quickly you can implement them.
Let’s make your cross-border payments simple. Schedule a chat with our expert team and explore how Tap can work for your business.

October is off to a strong start. The total market capitalization has once again crossed the $4 trillion threshold, fueled by fresh highs in Bitcoin (BTC) and renewed optimism around altcoins. But beneath the surface, whale wallets (i.e. those holding tens or hundreds of millions in crypto) are making strategic moves that could define market direction this month.
On-chain data paints a picture of accumulation, profit-taking, and rebalancing across top assets. Let’s take a closer look at what these whales are doing, and why their moves matter.
1. Bitcoin (BTC): Holding Strong
Bitcoin remains the market anchor, and its rise above $125,000 has been both a catalyst and a cash-out moment for many whales.
One wallet (3NVeXm) transferred 1,550 BTC (~$193.75 million) to Binance shortly after BTC set a new all-time high, while an address linked to Alameda Research moved another 250 BTC ($30.1 million), likely for liquidation or reallocation.
Despite these outflows, institutional interest has remained exceptionally strong. According to BitcoinTreasuries, corporate holdings continue to climb:
- Metaplanet added 5,268 BTC,
- Marathon Digital accumulated 373 BTC,
- CleanSpark added 308 BTC, and
- MicroStrategy increased by 196 BTC.
In total, the top 100 public companies now collectively hold over 1 million BTC, reinforcing Bitcoin’s role as the primary institutional asset in the digital market.
Moreover, whale selling pressure appears to be easing since late September. This sharp decline follows weeks of heavy selling activity, signaling that major holders may be positioning for a reinvigorated accumulation phase.

2. Altcoins: Strategic Bets Across the Board
Beyond the majors, whales seem to be placing their bets across select altcoins, particularly ASTER, ONDO, and Chainlink (LINK).
A single wallet recently accumulated 1.69 million ASTER tokens (~$3.14 million at the time of writing), while a Gnosis Safe Proxy address moved 11.67 million ONDO (~$10.8 million) into exchanges. Of that, 3.89 million ONDO was sent to a Bybit address linked to Arthur Hayes, suggesting that whales could be anticipating volatility or looking to trade around liquidity spikes.

Meanwhile, Arkham Intelligence flagged a whale deposit of 700,000 LINK (~$15.5 million) to Binance. Together, these moves suggest whales are diversifying their positions, betting selectively on tokens with strong ecosystems.
3. Ethereum (ETH): Accumulation Meets Opportunity
Ethereum has been one of the standout performers so far this month, reclaiming the $4,500 level. This rebound has coincided with heightened whale activity.
Blockchain analytics firm OnChain Lens tracked a new wallet, 0x982, that received 26,029 ETH (around $116.8 million) from Kraken before transferring the tokens into Aave for lending. Another whale, 0xa312, took 8,695 ETH (about $39.5 million) from Binance, a classic sign of long-term accumulation.

At the same time, Trend Research, a known institutional wallet, has been taking profits, sending 77,491 ETH (~$354 million) to Binance. Since October began, the firm has reportedly offloaded over 143,000 ETH, showing that even smart money is locking in gains after the rally.
Interestingly, several dormant Ethereum wallets have reactivated. An old whale (0xf97) deposited 4,500 ETH (~$20.4 million) after two years of inactivity. Two others sent funds to exchanges after four years, suggesting older holders may be using recent price strength to exit.
The Bigger Picture: Whales Drive the Waves
Whale movements are often leading indicators of market trends. Their accumulation patterns tend to precede rallies, while large exchange inflows often signal local tops. This “Uptober”, on-chain behavior shows a split strategy, whales are booking profits on rallies while continuing to deploy capital. However, data seems to lean more in favor of accumulation.
Such behavior aligns with a maturing market. Rather than chasing hype, whales appear to be rotating strategically, reinforcing assets with clear narratives, like Ethereum’s staking yields, Bitcoin’s institutional legitimacy, and select altcoins with vibrant communities and strong real-world use cases.
Watching these whale flows can provide valuable context. When the biggest wallets start moving, it’s rarely random.. and it never goes unnoticed.

Bitcoin and Ethereum dominate headlines, but they represent just one approach to distributed ledger technology. While most projects iterate on blockchain's foundational concepts, Hedera Hashgraph (HBAR) takes a different approach, pursuing an entirely different architectural philosophy.
The result is a network engineered for enterprise-grade performance - processing thousands of transactions per second with deterministic fees and minimal energy consumption. Where many blockchain networks struggle with the scalability trilemma, Hedera's hashgraph consensus mechanism offers a compelling alternative that doesn't sacrifice security for speed.
What distinguishes Hedera in practice is its enterprise adoption trajectory. Major corporations across finance, healthcare, and supply chain management have moved beyond pilot programs to production deployments. This isn't theoretical adoption - it's measurable network activity from organizations with serious compliance and performance requirements.
Hedera has positioned itself as one of the most corporate-friendly distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) available today. But how exactly does it work, and why does it stand apart from the blockchain crowd?
The Basics: What Is Hedera Hashgraph?
Launched in 2018, Hedera Hashgraph is a distributed ledger technology that offers a genuine alternative to blockchain architecture. Instead of organizing transactions into sequential blocks like a digital filing cabinet, Hedera uses a directed acyclic graph (DAG) structure called the hashgraph. Think of it more like a web of interconnected transactions.
This design allows multiple transactions to be processed in parallel rather than waiting in a single-file line. The result? Hedera can handle over 10,000 transactions per second (TPS) with finality in just a few seconds, while Bitcoin manages about 6–8 TPS and Ethereum handles 12–15 TPS.
At its core, Hedera is engineered to tackle three persistent challenges that have plagued distributed ledger technology:
- Transactions settle in seconds, not the minutes or hours you might wait with other networks. This makes it possible to build applications where timing actually counts.
- Scalability without the usual trade-offs, The network can handle thousands of transactions simultaneously without slowing down or getting expensive when things get busy. Most blockchains struggle with this balancing act.
- Energy use that makes sense, unlike networks that consume as much electricity as small countries, Hedera runs efficiently enough that companies don't have to justify massive energy bills to their boards.
How Hedera Works: Gossip and Virtual Voting
Hedera's performance stems from its unique consensus mechanism, which combines two clever innovations that work together like a well-orchestrated dance.
Instead of broadcasting every transaction to the entire network simultaneously (imagine shouting news in a crowded room), nodes "gossip" by randomly sharing information with a few neighbors. Those nodes then pass it along to their neighbors, creating a ripple effect. Over time, the entire network organically learns about every transaction without the communication overhead. That is known as the “gossip-about-gossip protocol”.
Virtual voting is where things get interesting: once all nodes have the same historical record of gossip, they can independently calculate how the network would vote on each transaction. No actual vote messages need to be sent across the network. The outcome is mathematically deterministic based on the gossip history, saving significant time and bandwidth.
Together, these methods achieve asynchronous Byzantine fault tolerance (aBFT), which represents one of the highest levels of security available in distributed systems. This means the network can reach consensus and continue operating even if up to one-third of nodes act maliciously or fail completely.
Governance: The Hedera Council
Perhaps the most controversial, and arguably the most distinctive, aspect of Hedera is its governance model. Instead of leaving critical network decisions to anonymous miners or distributed token holders, Hedera operates under a Governing Council of up to 39 well-known global organizations.
Current members include companies like Google, IBM, Dell, Boeing, Standard Bank, Ubisoft, and other established corporations. Each council member holds an equal vote on network decisions, including software upgrades, fee structures, and treasury management.
The rationale is straightforward: provide stability, accountability, and long-term strategic planning. However, this structure has sparked ongoing debate within the crypto community. Critics argue it reduces decentralization compared to blockchain networks where theoretically anyone can participate in governance, while supporters contend it offers the predictability that many enterprises require for serious adoption.

Key Services of Hedera
Hedera functions as more than just a payment network. The platform offers three core services that developers and enterprises can leverage to build decentralized applications:
Hedera Consensus Service (HCS): Provides secure, immutable logs of events and data. This proves particularly valuable for supply chain tracking, regulatory audits, and maintaining data integrity in heavily regulated industries like healthcare and finance.
Hedera Token Service (HTS): Enables the creation and management of various token types, including stablecoins, NFTs, and tokenized assets. Built-in features like account-level controls and compliance tools make it especially appealing for enterprises that need to meet regulatory requirements.
Hedera Smart Contract Service (HSCS): Supports Ethereum-compatible smart contracts, allowing developers to build DeFi applications, games, and automation tools while benefiting from Hedera's superior speed and substantially lower transaction fees.

Real-World Applications
Hedera's enterprise-focused approach has translated into practical implementations across multiple sectors:
- Finance: Standard Bank leverages Hedera's infrastructure for faster, more transparent cross-border payment processing.
- Supply chain: Companies like Suku and Avery Dennison use Hedera for product traceability and logistics management, providing end-to-end visibility.
- Healthcare: Safe Health Systems employs the network to securely log medical and clinical trial data while maintaining strict patient privacy standards.
- Gaming: Animoca Brands integrates Hedera's technology to create fair and tamper-proof in-game economies and digital asset management.
- Sustainability: Environmental organizations use Hedera's consensus service to track carbon credits and monitor environmental impact data with immutable records.
These implementations highlight Hedera's positioning as an enterprise-focused platform, creating a distinct contrast to networks that primarily serve DeFi protocols or retail trading activities.
Understanding HBAR: The Native Token
Like most distributed ledger technologies, Hedera operates with its own native cryptocurrency: HBAR. The token serves two fundamental purposes within the ecosystem:
- Network fuel: HBAR is required to pay transaction fees and access network services, including consensus operations, tokenization features, and smart contract execution.
- Network security: Node operators stake HBAR tokens to participate in consensus and help secure the network infrastructure.
One of Hedera's most practical advantages lies in its cost structure. A typical transaction costs approximately $0.0001, it’s economical enough to enable microtransactions and machine-to-machine payment scenarios that would be prohibitively expensive on other networks.
The total supply of HBAR is capped at 50 billion tokens. The distribution follows a controlled release schedule designed to avoid sudden market flooding while ensuring adequate liquidity for network operations.
How Hedera Compares to Other Networks
To understand Hedera's market position, it's helpful to consider how it stacks up against established blockchain models:
Proof-of-Work (PoW), exemplified by Bitcoin, is highly secure and battle-tested, but notoriously slow and energy-intensive.
Proof-of-Stake (PoS), used by Ethereum 2.0, is more energy-efficient than PoW, but can lead to wealth concentration among large token holders.
Lastly, Hedera Hashgraph uses gossip protocols and virtual voting to achieve speed, security, and efficiency simultaneously, while operating under corporate governance rather than anonymous network participants.
The trade-off is crystal-clear. Hedera prioritizes corporate trust, performance, and regulatory clarity, while accepting criticism that it may sacrifice some degree of decentralization compared to traditional blockchain networks.
The Challenges Ahead
Despite its technical strengths and enterprise adoption, Hedera faces some hurdles that could impact its long-term trajectory. The Governing Council model continues to raise questions about whether Hedera represents genuine decentralization or simply distributed corporate control, a debate that matters deeply to the broader crypto community's acceptance. Meanwhile, established networks like Solana, Avalanche, and Ethereum maintain their dominance over ecosystem development, making it challenging for Hedera to attract the vibrant developer communities that drive innovation.
The platform also faces an adoption challenge. While it excels in enterprise use cases, Hedera could broaden its appeal beyond corporate applications to achieve the kind of recognition that sustains long-term growth. Moreover, like all cryptocurrency projects, Hedera must navigate evolving regulatory frameworks across multiple jurisdictions, each with their own compliance requirements and restrictions.
Nevertheless, Hedera's focus on performance, enterprise-grade reliability, and regulatory compliance could provide resilience in certain market conditions where other projects would struggle to maintain institutional confidence.
HBAR ETF on the Horizon
Over the past several months, talk of a potential HBAR ETF has gained traction. An ETF would offer institutional and retail investors exposure to HBAR without needing to manage wallets, private keys, or direct custody. That kind of access lowers the entry-level barrier. Moreover, SEC approval of a Hedera ETF would imply a level of oversight, due diligence, and compliance that can help reduce perceived risks among cautious or regulated investors. It puts HBAR closer to the realm of mainstream finance instruments.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently pushed back the decision on the Canary HBAR ETF to November 8. The ETF was proposed by Nasdaq back in February; the SEC has delayed the decision twice already. Despite the most recent delay, however, market analysts remain optimistic. Bloomberg’s analysts, for instance, maintain a 90% likelihood of ETF approval in the near term.
The Future of Hedera
Hedera stands out in a crowded field by taking a completely different approach than most blockchain projects. Instead of following the usual playbook, they built something that actually works for businesses: fast transactions, costs you can predict, and energy usage that won't make your CFO cringe.
The real test isn't whether Hedera can keep doing what it's doing well. It's whether they can stay relevant as the whole distributed ledger world keeps evolving at breakneck speed. But here's the thing: while everyone else was busy trying to be the next Bitcoin, Hedera quietly built something that Fortune 500 companies actually want to use.
Whether that bet pays off long-term is anyone's guess. What's not up for debate is that they've proven there's more than one way to build a distributed ledger, and sometimes the road less traveled leads somewhere pretty interesting.

Tease: October has often been unkind to XRP holders. But this year, shifting sentiment, institutional inflows, and a promising setup could finally change the story.
XRP is currently navigating a descending wedge pattern, a chart formation commonly seen as a bullish reversal setup. While past Octobers haven’t favored the token, shifting institutional behaviour and macro catalysts could make this October a turning point.
Demand Under the Surface
Even as price action remained mixed, institutional players kept showing up in September for XRP and other tokens. Total inflows surpassed $220 million, a strong sign that big money sees value despite volatility.

Exchange net positions support the holders’ case. Throughout much of the month, holders brought assets onto exchanges, suggesting short-term selling pressure. Yet in the last week, 439 million XRP were withdrawn from exchanges, a sign that confidence is returning, and fewer coins are available to be sold. This withdrawal trend by both retail and institutional holders indicates a shift from distribution to accumulation, potentially softening downside risk.

History Doesn’t Always Repeat
Historically, October has been a rough month for XRP. Over the past decade, it has averaged a –4.5% return, making it one of the weaker months for the token.

However, past patterns may not fully apply in 2025. It’s worth taking into account that past Octobers occurred during heavy regulatory uncertainty and before institutional infrastructure like ETFs existed. With those catalysts now in play, the usual October weakness may be less relevant this year.
The Price Game: Breakout or Breakdown?
XRP currently trades at around $2.90, trapped between the wedge’s resistance and support lines. A confirmed breakout above $3.02 could set the stage for a rally toward a new all-time high.

But those gains depend heavily on support levels holding firm and positive regulatory momentum. Should ETF approval chatter or institutional inflows accelerate, XRP could build enough momentum to push through resistance.
Still, risks are real. If the breakout fails, XRP could fall back to $2.75, or even lower, invalidating the bullish thesis and repeating October’s usual pattern of weakness.
What Traders and Holders Should Watch
- $2.75 level as key support, $3.02 as breakthrough resistance.
- ETF approvals or denials could act as volume catalysts.
- Fresh large withdrawals or cold-storage movements suggest longer-term conviction.
- Bitcoin’s strength or weakness often drag altcoins with it, XRP is no exception.
For beginners, this means October is a month to stay alert. For more seasoned traders, this wedge setup is looking like one of the cleaner setups in recent years. If it resolves upward, the upside could surprise some skeptics.
Turning Point
October has historically brought turbulence for XRP, but 2025 offers a different backdrop: institutional flows, ETF speculation, and stronger token infrastructure. The descending wedge pattern gives a clear roadmap. If resistance breaks, bulls may be rewarded; if not, the old October curse could strike again.
That said, XRP’s story is still being written. This month will test whether the narrative has shifted enough to rewrite past patterns. Either way, it’s absolutely shaping up to be an interesting ride.

Gold has got the Midas touch. The precious metal has been on a historic run, surging 45% this year to reach an all-time high of $3,789 per ounce. That kind of parabolic move has left commodities and even crypto markets looking sluggish by comparison. But in financial history, one pattern has repeated itself: when gold runs hot, Bitcoin isn’t far behind.
The question many traders are now asking is simple. Could Bitcoin be about to mirror gold’s rally, just as it has in past cycles?
Why Gold Is Surging
Gold’s meteoric rise began in February 2024 when it finally broke above the $2,100 resistance level after multiple failed attempts. Once through, momentum took over, sending the price soaring nearly 90% from that breakout point.
This rally hasn’t been slow and steady, it’s been almost parabolic. While bullish sentiment is undeniable, some caution flags are waving. The monthly Relative Strength Index (RSI), a common indicator of whether an asset is “overbought” or “oversold, is now at historically high levels. In layman terms, that means gold’s recent surge may be running too hot, increasing the odds of a short-term pullback.

For seasoned traders, that often signals a pullback is coming. Still, even with the possibility of retracement, gold’s rally has further cemented its role as a safe-haven asset during uncertain macro conditions.
The Bitcoin–Gold Correlation
Bitcoin is often referred to as “digital gold,” and not without reason. Both assets share scarcity, gold by nature, Bitcoin by its algorithmic cap of 21 million coins. Both also thrive when confidence in fiat currencies falters.
Historically, Bitcoin and gold have shown positive correlation during major risk-off periods. When fear enters the market, whether due to inflation, geopolitical tension, or financial instability, investors often turn to either or both.
But here’s a twist… During bull markets, their paths tend to diverge.

This pattern has played out at least twice before. For instance, at the end of 2016 and again in 2024, gold’s price surged first, paused, and then Bitcoin picked up the baton with explosive upside momentum. Gold effectively takes the lead, and Bitcoin follows.
With gold now parabolic and at risk of cooling off, history suggests that capital could rotate into Bitcoin next.
Is BTC Ready for Its “Catch-Up” Rally?
Gold’s surge may be nearing exhaustion, but that doesn’t necessarily mean its safe-haven narrative fades. Instead, both assets could share the spotlight: gold as the traditional store of value, Bitcoin as its modern counterpart.
Still, Bitcoin tends to move more aggressively. Where gold posts steady climbs, Bitcoin often reacts in sharper bursts, reflecting its smaller market cap and higher volatility. If capital rotation does occur, Bitcoin’s upside could outpace gold by multiples, as it has in prior cycles.
Some analysts argue that this setup makes Bitcoin uniquely positioned for the months ahead. Gold’s record highs demonstrate demand for hard assets in today’s uncertain world. Even if just a fraction of that demand flows into Bitcoin, the impact could be amplified by its relative size and liquidity profile.
As Good as Gold?
If gold begins to retrace after such a rapid climb, traders and institutions looking for a new vehicle may view Bitcoin as the natural beneficiary. Several factors strengthen this case:
- Market Cycles. Bitcoin has historically entered new uptrends when gold’s momentum stalls, benefiting from shifting capital flows.
- Scarcity Appeal. Bitcoin’s halving in April 2024 cut block rewards to 3.125 BTC, reinforcing its scarcity narrative just as gold’s surge reminded investors of the value of limited-supply assets.
- Institutional Pathways. With U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs now approved and seeing inflows, access for large investors has never been easier. The structure mirrors how gold ETFs opened floodgates for institutional adoption in the 2000s.
- Digital Hedge Narrative. For younger, more tech-native investors, Bitcoin increasingly plays the role that gold has for older generations; a hedge against inflation, currency debasement, and systemic shocks.
It’s important to remember that correlation does not guarantee causation. While Bitcoin has followed gold in previous cycles, macro conditions today are unique. Global central bank policy, shifting risk appetites, and regulatory landscapes all play a role in shaping Bitcoin’s trajectory.
Moreover, Bitcoin remains far more volatile than gold, which makes it less predictable as a safe-haven asset. Gold is measured in millennia; Bitcoin has just over 15 years of history. The comparison is instructive but not identical.
That said, the parallels are hard to ignore. When gold goes parabolic, Bitcoin often isn’t far behind. And if the pattern of divergence and catch-up repeats, BTC could be setting up for its own moment of glory.
A Golden Opportunity.
Gold’s explosive run to all-time highs has reminded investors (once again) why scarce assets matter during uncertain times. But recent historical data suggests the real story may still be unfolding. Bitcoin could be next in line.
With institutional rails now in place, a halving fresh in the rearview, and gold flashing signs of exhaustion, conditions appear ripe for Bitcoin to step out of gold’s shadow and capture renewed market attention.
The coming months may reveal whether Bitcoin once again mirrors gold’s path, or begins carving out its own.
Kickstart your financial journey
Ready to take the first step? Join forward-thinking traders and savvy money users. Unlock new possibilities and start your path to success today.
Get started